Started By
Message
re: Is Locker > Snead or Mallett
Posted on 9/8/09 at 11:13 pm to inelishaitrust
Posted on 9/8/09 at 11:13 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
He's a beautiful athlete.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 11:46 pm to Duke
you pigs are getting as bad as WRT. AS OF RIGHT NOW yes I think JL is better than Mallet and Snead. he throws the ball very well and has the ability to make you pay if you do not hold your lanes on the rush. He made some very heads up plays while under pressure and hurt LSU for being to aggressive early in the game. Which btw is why I think we got very vanilla on D until halftime.
Snead and Mallet both are great pocket passers but lack the mobility JL has and have shown that pressure can effect them. Memphis had Snead confused for most of the game.
JL won me over this weekend because of his ability to make plays with his arm and legs and not forcing the issue when it was not there. To many times a coach will put an athlete at QB and hope is ability to run will out perform his lack of passing threat, it is not that way with JL. He reminds me of Steve Young. I know that is high praise but I think it is deserving.
Snead and Mallet both are great pocket passers but lack the mobility JL has and have shown that pressure can effect them. Memphis had Snead confused for most of the game.
JL won me over this weekend because of his ability to make plays with his arm and legs and not forcing the issue when it was not there. To many times a coach will put an athlete at QB and hope is ability to run will out perform his lack of passing threat, it is not that way with JL. He reminds me of Steve Young. I know that is high praise but I think it is deserving.
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:30 am to cardee2003
Chavis will make you famous...You will be singing the same tune about the Vandy quarterback.. 
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:34 am to arwicklu
Ok, if how they played against LSU is the measuring stick, then somebody owes Casey Dick a damn Heisman. 
This post was edited on 9/9/09 at 4:25 am
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:51 am to ljhog
Casey Dick was 2-2 vs. LSU
I don't really fear LSU's Defense anymore. We are averaging like 36 points PPG against them the past 3 seasons.
I don't really fear LSU's Defense anymore. We are averaging like 36 points PPG against them the past 3 seasons.
This post was edited on 9/9/09 at 12:54 am
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:54 am to inelishaitrust
I saw plenty of Mallett while he was at Michigan, can't see why anyone would deny he is talented.
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:55 am to pitbull20
quote:
AS OF RIGHT NOW yes I think JL is better than Mallet and Snead.
Someone was sniffing paste
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:58 am to LSU Slacker
quote:
LSU Slacker
I guess you don't post on the rant that often?
Posted on 9/9/09 at 8:22 am to pioneerbasketball
ala BILL CLINTON (IT DEPENDS ON WHAT IS, IS)
Posted on 9/9/09 at 9:50 am to FootballHog
quote:
quote:
LSU Slacker
I guess you don't post on the rant that often?
Ever been to Hogville? They still believe they would be NC in '06 if they had not lost to LSU and Florida. Of course they forget about being humiliated by USC.
Locker was Pac 12 Freshman of the year. He was drafted by the Angels.
Locker,Snead,and Mallett are very good pro prospects. Time will tell who will be the best.
Posted on 9/9/09 at 9:54 am to Bert Lyons 716
quote:
They still believe they would be NC in '06 if they had not lost to LSU and Florida.
You don't think a 12-1 SEC team would be in the title game? If not for a blown assignment on a kickoff return and "the fish flop", we would have been in the NC game that year. No doubt.
This post was edited on 9/9/09 at 9:55 am
Posted on 9/9/09 at 9:57 am to LSU Slacker
quote:
Someone was sniffing paste
Posted on 9/9/09 at 10:05 am to FootballHog
quote:
They still believe they would be NC in '06 if they had not lost to LSU and Florida.
You don't think a 12-1 SEC team would be in the title game? If not for a blown assignment on a kickoff return and "the fish flop", we would have been in the NC game that year. No doubt.
No,USC was clearly a better team. If LSU had not lost 5 games last yr,Tigers would have played for NC. Public outrage would never allow Arky to be crowned NC.
Ya'll were not even a top 10 team. Ask Wisconsin!
Posted on 9/9/09 at 10:10 am to Bert Lyons 716
quote:
No,USC was clearly a better team. If LSU had not lost 5 games last yr,Tigers would have played for NC.
I would have loved to play USC when we were rolling. We may not have won, but it would have been closer.
And there's a big difference between losing 5 games and blowing 2 routine plays. Our players gave up after Fish flopped.
This post was edited on 9/9/09 at 10:11 am
Posted on 9/9/09 at 11:22 am to Bert Lyons 716
quote:
They still believe they would be NC in '06 if they had not lost to LSU and Florida.
I believe we would have won 12 straight games that year. The longest Streak anybody else had.
quote:
Ever been to Hogville?
I'm sure I can find some great threads posted on the rant.
Posted on 9/9/09 at 11:24 am to FootballHog
quote:
You don't think a 12-1 SEC team would be in the title game? If not for a blown assignment on a kickoff return and "the fish flop", we would have been in the NC game that year. No doubt.
Michigan still would have gone over you guys, as bullshite as that is
This post was edited on 9/9/09 at 11:25 am
Posted on 9/9/09 at 12:53 pm to Bert Lyons 716
quote:
Bert Lyons 716
Snead and Mallett are light years ahead of Locker when it comes to throwing the ball, reading a defense, and being accurate. What you saw from Locker Saturday came because well even if you take a medicore QB and you give him all day in pocket, then you let the DB's play off the receivers you will turn that medicore QB into a great one.
Posted on 9/9/09 at 1:39 pm to LSU Slacker
quote:
Snead and Mallett are light years ahead of Locker when it comes to throwing the ball, reading a defense, and being accurate. What you saw from Locker Saturday came because well even if you take a medicore QB and you give him all day in pocket, then you let the DB's play off the receivers you will turn that medicore QB into a great one.
Locker was able to scramble out of pocket and make very accurate throws while on the move.He is an excellent athlete with all the tools to play in NFL. I haven't seen any of them play enough to know if one is a lot better than the other.
If you watch the replay,you will see Locker rarely had time to set his feet and throw down field. Talk to me after this season is over. We will know more then.
Posted on 9/24/09 at 9:58 pm to sugatowng
Can we put this debate to bed now?
Locker > Snead or Mallet.
Locker > Snead or Mallet.
Popular
Back to top


1





