Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/19/22 at 12:57 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
So, if South Carolina were to win the SEC in 2023, would the big 6 become the big 7 or does someone get booted from the big 6?
Your op states that you forgot who is in it. Yet you want to boot someone out of it.
Now you are bumping your own thread where you get beaten down pretty badly.
And regardless of how anyone answers your question, you’ll melt down for another four pages.
It’s fun to watch you not even be able to troll Florida correctly.
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:00 pm to dstone12
I'm not trolling Florida. They took care of that themselves. Are you not capable of answering a simple question?
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:03 pm to Faurot fodder
says the guy that cannot answer simple questions.
I mean, you’ll have to answer questions seriously if you want yours answered, my son.
“ I’m not trolling Florida. “
I get it. You failed horribly in your OP.
I mean, you’ll have to answer questions seriously if you want yours answered, my son.
“ I’m not trolling Florida. “
quote:
Is Florida in the "big 6"?
I get it. You failed horribly in your OP.
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:09 pm to dstone12
It could be that I'm trolling the idea of a big 6, and not Florida. So, dickstain, what happens if South Carolina wins the SEC next year?
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:11 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
Big 4, Big 6, Big Lebowski... it's all the same.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:11 pm to dstone12
quote:
I guess this his why I am confused. I may have not worded it correctly, but i don’t think I said that Alabama and UT were paired up against vandy and Arky. So I am confused there.
Alabama was paired against Vandy from 1992-2002
Tennessee was paired against Arkansas 1992-2002
quote:
you'd also know that you need to have one good cross Div rival for views and then keep your big six in the national conversation as well.
This is where I was going w/ Florida/Aub swap, they were each paired up against two good teams when there was an easy fix to give them each a softy(State and UK), blowing a hole in that theory.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:14 pm to Faurot fodder
technically yes...but at this point they sitting at the end of the table and no one really speaks to them
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:20 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:for which you are not a part of. Sour grapes
It could be that I'm trolling the idea of a big 6
quote:
So, dickstain
quote:
what happens if South Carolina wins the SEC next year?
Your team, whoever it is, won’t be in this group that “ you don’t -wink- want “ to be in.
It wouldn’t matter if you were a vandy/Mizz/aggy fan. You ain’t it.
Sorry, kid.
EtaBtw. You going to answer my question?
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:40 pm to dstone12
Did you have a question? The only thing I saw from you was the typical "if you ain't in it you know" and "sour grapes" nonsense. Just typical, unoriginal redneck drivel.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:41 pm to Faurot fodder
2009? Yeah. Right now? Hell no. We're swinging a 10+ win season every 3 or so but that ain't it.
Right now the conference is UGA and Bama, still.
Right now the conference is UGA and Bama, still.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 1:43 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
Did you have a question? The only thing I saw from you was the typical "if you ain't in it you know" and "sour grapes" nonsense. Just typical, unoriginal redneck drivel.
Funny. Because lost in your angry melts, is a question. I even linked you to it.
I don’t expect you to answer it any more
And by the way………..your team ain’t in it
Please continue the melt. Can’t wait for next non sequitur answer.
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 2:00 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Put some respeck on 1977 Kentucky, Barner
Why does 1977 Kentucky deserve "respeck" dumbass?
Was Kentucky named champions or co-champions of the SEC in 1977? I don't believe they were.
If you want to cry about uat playing an extra game in 1977 to be declared champs, then Auburn should be declared 1972 champs since both Auburn and uat had one loss and Auburn won the Iron Bowl (Punt Bama Punt). However, 1972 uat was declared champion because they also played one extra game (AU was 5-1, uat was 6-1).
1993 Auburn was undefeated and beat both participants in the SECCG. However, uat was declared champion because they won the SECCG, which Auburn couldn't compete in because of probation.
The SEC Champions in 1972, 1977 and 1993 were all legitimately awarded (no matter how much many of us...me included...hate it).
Posted on 12/19/22 at 2:07 pm to GusAU
quote:
1993 Auburn was undefeated and beat both participants in the SECCG. However, uat was declared champion because they won the SECCG, which Auburn couldn't compete in because of probation.
Thats weird bc everything I pull up shows Florida winning the SECCG in 1993z
Posted on 12/19/22 at 2:18 pm to Faurot fodder
Since 2012, here's the average in-conference records:
Alabama : 7-1
Georgia : 6-2
Florida : 5-3
LSU : 5-3
Auburn : 4-4
Ole Miss : 4-4
Miss St : 4-4
Missouri : 4-4
South Carolina : 4-4
A&M : 4-4
Kentucky : 3-5
Tenn : 3-5
Arkansas : 2-6
Vandy : 2-6
Alabama : 7-1
Georgia : 6-2
Florida : 5-3
LSU : 5-3
Auburn : 4-4
Ole Miss : 4-4
Miss St : 4-4
Missouri : 4-4
South Carolina : 4-4
A&M : 4-4
Kentucky : 3-5
Tenn : 3-5
Arkansas : 2-6
Vandy : 2-6
Posted on 12/19/22 at 2:57 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Alabama : 7-1
Georgia : 6-2
I see a big 2. After that...eh.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:00 pm to Faurot fodder
Not anymore. Lol
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:08 pm to Faurot fodder
What a waste of time and bandwidth. The title of Big 6 is totally arbitrary. Last 5 years? 10 years? 20 years? Totally subjective. If you want the SEC Big 6, the only valid measure is all-time history, because all other periods go in cycles. Yes, even your team - no matter what team that is, including Georgia.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:12 pm to BigScoreboard
quote:
What a waste of time and bandwidth. The title of Big 6 is totally arbitrary.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:15 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
By that criteria, Ole Miss would have been in the big whatever number you choose in the 1960s, at what point would you have kicked Ole Miss out?
For starters, when competition was inclusive of all races.
Also it's not just automatic that if you win an SEC championship you are full standing member. You are in a probationary period. The Big Six schools have tradition and backing that ensure they be back again and again. See contrast with Tenn. / Texas AM this year. That's just the way it is.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News