Started By
Message

re: If LSU and Bama aren’t permanent opponents, it is with 100% certainty…

Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:06 pm to
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86984 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:06 pm to
Alabama is gonna have their hands full with 7x NC Tennessee and 9x NC Auburn for the foreseeable future. So I can’t blame them
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Alabama is gonna have their hands full with 7x NC Tennessee and 9x NC Auburn for the foreseeable future. So I can’t blame them
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
2807 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

They definitely bitched. Nick Saban was crying about it two years ago.
Was that before the first time LSU gave up four rushing touchdowns to Jalen Milroe in a blowout loss, or before the second time LSU gave up four rushing touchdowns to Jalen Milroe in a blowout loss?

No wonder the LSU fanbase is telling the administration to throw in the towel.
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
82521 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

And what's your record against msst? When is the last time msst beat you guys, because LSU just did it in 2023. We all know you children want a easy schedule. You'd probably be happier in the ACC.


So what 3 permanent opponents are you advocating for as a LSU fan?

Alabama and who else?
Posted by Themicah86
Member since Jun 2023
2468 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:15 pm to
Why do you think bama is scared to play you?
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36208 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:17 pm to
quote:



As they should.

Who else in the conference would have 3 of the Big 6 as permanent rivals?

Easy for LSU fans to bitch about when they’ll almost certainly draw at least one permanent opponent who is a historical doormat.



Meh I think LSU fans know that OM is basically a guarantee and likely TAMU and so are overcompensating trying to force Bama.


I think most are just so attached to Bama because we WANT at least one big 6 permanent and its makes monetary sense for networks etc

Everyone knows that we are AT best number 3 on everyone’s list outside of OM and TAMU and even for those we are 2

I think everyone is secretly worried that we get stuck with majority newbies with TAMU, Ark/OU and OM.


I think most fans would love a OM, Bama/Auburn, Fla or even Bama AU Fla

My prediction is OM TAMU Fla. My preference is OM Bama/Aub Fla
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 5:19 pm
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
18270 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:18 pm to
42-13 seems like lsu is the soft one
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
82521 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Meh I think LSU fans know that OM is basically a guarantee and likely TAMU and so are overcompensating trying to force Bama.


How did the LSU-Arkansas Battle for the Boot become obsolete so fast?

Such a travesty.
Posted by Hilonghorn9
Member since Oct 2024
586 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:35 pm to
Alabama is a dominant football team throughout time. You’re not going to find teams with 80+ games played against Alabama that are close to a 60/40 split.
Posted by Sleepy_Tiger
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Aug 2021
10186 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

We're not your rival. There's no historical significance tied to these games. There's not even a nickname tied to the series. Go piss your pants over another game.


for a team that’s not your rival. There’s been enough Bama posters starting LSU threads pissing and moaning and crying about LSU all off-season. I think depending on the day of the week LSU may or may not be arrival or it depends how your season is going.

But tell us again how many national championships Alabama claims lol
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36208 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

How did the LSU-Arkansas Battle for the Boot become obsolete so fast?




LSU vs Arkansas was the epitome of forced and manufactured.


For comparison.


LSU and Arkansas have only played 7 more times than LSU vs TAMU despite Arkansas being in the conference for 20 more years.

Prior to Arkansas joining in 92 the last time LSU played Arkansas was 1966 cotton bowl and before that was 1956. Almost 40 years without playing each other.

LSU vs TAMU on the other hand was played 50x prior to TAMU joining the SEC. I believe the longest break was from 95-2011. And there’s no stretch of only playing once like there was with arky from 56-92. Hell we’ve played TAMU more than Auburn

On top of that there is substantially more shared footprint in the SETX south Louisiana oil community.

Additionally Aggy has all the potential of a big 6 program.



Despite the rants protests LSU TAMU makes sense and works. In fact I’d wager Aggies probably consider us their number 2, certainly their number 2 in the SEC.


Arky on the other hand was a forced thing because at the time we shared an border and didn’t have an intrastate rival.
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 5:44 pm
Posted by RelentlessTide
Member since Feb 2020
3959 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:42 pm to
You make a good argument. But don’t get carried away with TV ratings. Anytime teams are contending for an NC, viewership is high. I’ll bet, in Saban’s early years at Bama, Bama-Fla games were the highest rated.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
2807 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

 pissing, moaning and crying about LSU all off-season
More like "mocking, belittling, and ridiculing."
Posted by G&P
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2013
2338 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:20 pm to
You’re totally correct.

Bama cries, ESPN laughs… You took the $ you fools.
Posted by G&P
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2013
2338 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:21 pm to
You’re totally correct.

Bama cries, ESPN laughs… You took the $ you fools.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
70860 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Just because CBS decided the game was worthy of the primetime slot doesn’t make it real.LSU has as many loses by 29 as they have wins in the last ten years. And in those primetime games, LSU only won twice. Including multiples loses by 28+ and back to back shutouts at home. Honestly LSU/Auburn is more of a rivalry than Alabama/LSU.

Ok, tell me all about how competitive the Tennessee game has been in the last 20 years.

And if you want to tell me “it’s about history, not just the last 20 years.” Then your comment about LSU and Auburn makes no sense. LSU has played Auburn less than anyone else in the former Western division and less than A&M/Florida. You think that because LSU/Auburn was one of the bigger SEC games every year for 10-15 years. That sounds familiar doesn’t it?
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 6:38 pm
Posted by PurpleSingularity
Member since Dec 2017
2431 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Why do you think bama is scared to play you?


quote:

I've always been an advocate for playing more [conference] games. But if you play more games, I think you have to get the three fixed [opponents] right. They're giving us Tennessee, Auburn and LSU. I don't know how they come to that [decision]
- Nick Saban
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36208 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:34 pm to
quote:



Ok, tell me all about how competitive the Tennessee game has been in the last 20 years.

And if you want to tell me “it’s about history, not just the last 20 years.” Then your comment about LSU and Auburn makes no sense. LSU has played Auburn less than anyone else in the former Western division and less than A&M. You think that because LSU/Auburn was one of the bigger SEC games every year for 10-15 years. That sounds familiar doesn’t it?


As stated before I just want a big 6 matchup but yeah their reasoning is beyond laughable.



It only matters because the last 20 years Saban was here………yeah…that’s how rivalries happen. You either are in the same state or there is a prolonged period of significant bad blood.



Also the Bama state game is some indispensable piece of history despite it being played 10 less times than MSST LSU


This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 6:35 pm
Posted by Saunson69
Stephen the Pirate
Member since May 2023
8230 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

I don't think bama fans are sad if LSU stays a permanent game.


Huge, huge variable you're leaving out of this. Saban is no longer there. Alabama will never be the same again. So you really just have 1 game which Deboer won but LSU would much rather have an annual matchup vs Deboer than Saban. As much as Bama fans want to convince themselves it will go back to the way it was. It never will. Bama will probably become another LSU. 9-3, then an occasional season they go off. Nothing wrong with that. If you can win a Nati once every 8 or so years, then you're doing very well as a program.
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 6:36 pm
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
24652 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 6:50 pm to
Why would they want to change? I love LSU but they owned our asses.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter