Started By
Message
re: I Have a Question About the Mississippi State Sanctions
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:01 pm to TimeOutdoors
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:01 pm to TimeOutdoors
that would be great if it also applied to Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio State, North Carolina, etc. and it was applied somewhat evenly.
1
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:06 pm to MIZ_COU
It would be great, but I’m not going to waste time considering the Jones. I’m more concerned about keeping my house in order. Many State fans disagree with me, but I honestly have 0.0 percent respect for anyone that cheats or is lazy. None.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:08 pm to scrooster
quote:and they have gotten so blatant about it
I hate the NCAA for their lack of consistency and their obvious biases and favoritisms.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:10 pm to BoarEd
Dont care. frick Miss State, they deserve it.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:22 pm to BoarEd
Yes. Boycott. You go first.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 1:24 pm to makersmark1
quote:
They tried to buy Cam, but he would not do it.
Anyone who thinks Auburn is squeaky clean well
This post was edited on 8/24/19 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 8/24/19 at 2:13 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Gtfo with this shite
Hook was very shiny, but you bit
Posted on 8/24/19 at 2:14 pm to TeddyKJB
quote:
Anyone who thinks Auburn is squeaky clean well
I thought the hook was very bright, but this was like shooting fish in a barrel.
This post was edited on 8/24/19 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 8/24/19 at 2:40 pm to Reservoir dawg
quote:
If we had tried to buy Cam and Auburn didn't, he would have played at State.
my god this is just delicious.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 2:51 pm to makersmark1
quote:
Hook was very shiny, but you bit
I don't see how you take that as me "biting." I just told the poster to get the frick outta here with that shite.
I was hoping for a serious discussion. I'm learning that's not possible around here though. So my next question would be what's up with all the bleeding vaginas around here that get pissed off when people come here to troll? In the last two days it has been firmly established that people around here are simply incapable of having a real discussion about anything.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 3:21 pm to BoarEd
Here’s the question I have everybody keeps saying that the players are suspended for eight games and it does not say that... it says they will be ineligible for 70% of the year which is actually 8.4 games so either they are going to miss 8 1/2 games or will they have to miss nine games actually?
Posted on 8/24/19 at 3:25 pm to 18mph
It'll be interesting to see how they play it. Do you sit them out completely for the non-con games and one half of each of the following 8, or do you sit them the first 8 games leaving them all available for the last 4?
My guess is it's a fluid situation. Coach has a lot to think about.
My guess is it's a fluid situation. Coach has a lot to think about.
Posted on 8/24/19 at 3:33 pm to BoarEd
Nope! You will be glad to get to face them when they have those 10 players that are suspended for 8 games and one of those games will be against your team this year. Your team might have a chance to win that one!
Posted on 8/24/19 at 3:33 pm to BoarEd
quote:
all the bleeding vaginas around here
It’s really hard not to laugh at this
Posted on 8/24/19 at 4:05 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Nope! You will be glad to get to face them when they have those 10 players that are suspended for 8 games and one of those games will be against your team this year. Your team might have a chance to win that one!
You clearly don't understand Arkansas fans. When we played Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl a few years back our fans were demanding that Ohio State play with their full roster. And they did. And we narrowly lost. If those 5 inelligible players had actually sat out we surely would have won the game.
But we are the type of people that would rather square up to a fair fight rather than puss out.
I'm not surprised such a pussified post comes from a Mizzou fan though.
This post was edited on 8/24/19 at 4:07 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News