Started By
Message
re: I didn't see Bama look dominant over Texas!
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:26 pm to bamascott2
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:26 pm to bamascott2
quote:
Clearly, you have no clue.
And you have a clue with your insightful commentary that contains an "F" bomb or similar common Bama dialect used every other word?
You exude your level of intelligence with every post you make.
Keep em' comin.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:27 pm to picollo
quote:
picollo
so should we claim a moral loss because we didn't dominate?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:30 pm to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:
OK - in your feeble, subjective mind.
Maybe next year, gump, you can hoist that second BCS Crystal - maybe next year.
Again, I ask, will LSU's title mean less in ten years, if there's another system being used to crown national champions? Whether it was Alabama's 1992 national title, under the Bowl Alliance, or the 2009 national title under the BCS, both those crystal footballs are meaningful.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:31 pm to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:That's odd, you spelled it correctly in your other posts.
You really had to ask? It's "Bama Speak" for Gump. Had to spell it out in a way you could understand.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:32 pm to nothingbutawinner00
GO LSU
BAMA SUCKS
TEXAS SUCKS
GEAUX TIGERS

BAMA SUCKS
TEXAS SUCKS
GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:32 pm to picollo
injury is part of the game, defense dominated for bama just like every other game, mccoy didn't want none of that d anyway
Posted on 1/14/10 at 7:33 pm to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:
And you have a clue with your insightful commentary that contains an "F" bomb or similar common Bama dialect used every other word?
You exude your level of intelligence with every post you make.
Keep em' comin.
Why, thank you very much.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 8:02 pm to picollo
quote:
Hahaha........
You mean the same Bama pass rush that hadn't been able to get to a freshman QB all night, and ended the night with one sack? That Bama pass rush?
That sack only happened because the freshman QB didn't call the right line protection causing a rushing LB to come free. That was their fault more than it was YOUR doing. Quit acting like you set that up.
Texas was ripped apart because they fumbled the ball on their own goal line, due to a mistake by their O-line? Hahahaha!! You Bama guys sure are delusional!
Pay attention to the game. Gilbert was hit several times. A lot of the times he released the ball just before he got clocked, and others he managed to make it back to the LOS so it statistically wasn't a "sack." But despite not getting sacked 5 times, he didn't complete many passes so those sacks were basically QB hurries anyways.
Funny how once Bama dropped a shite-ton of coverage back there though, Gilbert gets splattered.
quote:
You need to watch more football son! Seriously!
Other way around kid.
quote:
Bama did the same thing offensively that they had done all game, it just stopped working.
Bama was up by 18. No reason to continue pressing at that point because Texas was getting choked to death.
quote:
Look at the play in question, where the Texas QB fumbled. Had he not been a freshman, and looked at his slot receiver was not only wide open, by lined up on a LB. A more experienced QB would have known that, and got him the ball soon as the ball was snapped.
Speculation isn't worth a shite. Gilbert never saw the DE coming. He could've been a seasoned vet, and his peripherals still wouldn't have seen that DE coming. Doesn't matter who your QB is during that play...he's getting splattered. shite happens. Nothing to be ashamed about. Was a great play by a great player. It's not the first time he's done that.
quote:
You Texas guys want to believe you weren't that much worse that you have actually gone and convinced yourself of stuff that didn't actually happen. Other message boards seem to be of the feeling that you got arse raped, we will leave it at that.
Fixed that for you picollo
Posted on 1/14/10 at 8:03 pm to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:
OK - in your feeble, subjective mind.
Maybe next year, gump, you can hoist that second BCS Crystal - maybe next year.
It would be our coach's third...since one of yours belongs to him anyways you silly corndog.
This post was edited on 1/15/10 at 11:37 am
Posted on 1/14/10 at 9:44 pm to picollo
quote:
Uh, 75 total yards in the second half when Texas finally got the freshman comfortable shows what the game was really about.
Anyone can roll up good yardage when the other offense is floundering, and can't get a first down with an 18 year old quarterback. They were getting shut down in the second half when the defense actually got a blow. That's what I saw. I will excuse any defense that has an offense that has 3 first downs out of 15 or so possessions. Once they got going, they were locking down Bama's running game. 22-66 yards in the second half.
Thank God that somebody without Crimson colored glasses on posted the truth. I have screaming this same shite for a week now. The Bammers keep talking about domination when there was absolutely none. Had a Freshman QB not left the TX. D on the field for most of the game there would have been no 2 Gump RB's with 100yd performances and definitely no Bama victory. Like you said, the kid was only down by 3 with 3 mins left in the game. Thank you for some rationality. There is very little of that around here lately.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 9:46 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Who gives a rats arse, we won another championship, but who is counting. We might have to get a new trophy case. 
Posted on 1/14/10 at 9:50 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
Had a Freshman QB not left the TX. D on the field for most of the game
I'm not here for the slap fight but the TOP was
33:39 to 26:21.
Bama ran 51 running plays and Texas ran 28. The TOP difference was because Texas doesn't run the ball. 28 rushes at 2.9 yards per carry doesn't help you win the TOP game.
Obviously only the final score matters but Texas can't run the ball and Bama didn't need to pass it. That was pretty much the game.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:39 pm to picollo
quote:
They looked like a team that got lucky that the catalyst of the Texas offense was a true freshman. IMO, anyone else under center with any experience, and Bama probably loses
Lots of problems with this statement. If you are as reliant as UT was on one player to just have a shot at the BCSNC, then they required a lot of luck to not have lost him at some earlier point in the season. Being that reliant also doesn't speak very highly of UT as a team.
Their wasn't one player Bammer could of lost and then be completely out of contention. That was the biggest difference in Bammer and Tejas, Bama was/is a complete team, with better coaching(Bammer didn't throw a damn pass with 15 seconds left down 11 points right before the half), who actually overcame their mistakes. (See the first 6 minutes of the game when they completely self destructed but held the vaunted Tejas offesne to only six points).
Why didn't Tejas protect their only prayer at winning in Colt McCoy instead of calling a running play for him on the 5th play of the game? If Tejas was clearly the better team with McCoy and would of shredded Bammer, why not protect your QB? Saban coached circles around Mack Brown IMO.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:49 pm to picollo
quote:
LSU-OSU 07=dominant
LSU was dominant, but OSU still outgained us, so that goes against your earlier point about UT having more yards than Bama and therefore Bama not being dominant.
quote:
Anytime you are biting your nails with 3 mins left to play. It is not a dominant performance by either team.
OU was within 30 yards or so of tying the 2003 game against us even though we had twice the amount of yards that they had. We dominated that game and still only won by a TD.
Bottom line there are various ways of being dominant...stats are not always an indicator and neither are scores. Bama didn't need any offensive yards for one of their TDs and only three more for another. Their defense essentially scored 14 pts right there.
As others have said, Saban shut it down in the 2nd half and for good reason. At 24-6 and up until 3 min to go in the 3rd, there was no reason to think UT could move the ball with Gilbert, so why take a chance, especially with their D?
This post was edited on 1/14/10 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 1/15/10 at 1:50 am to secftw
quote:
It would be our coache's third...since one of yours belongs to him anyways you silly corndog
Can you tell me where said trophy (one of LSU's) that belongs to your coach currently resides?
I'll make one guess: NOT in bama.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 1:57 am to bamascott2
quote:
Why, thank you very much.
You are welcome. You should write a book "Making Dumbass Posts for Dumbass People". It would sell easily like your sister or cousin at the Taco Bell on a Friday night.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 2:01 am to CapstoneGrad06
I'm going to go out on a limb and say the system we have now will see us through our generation. Just not enought 'shite bombs' entering the BCS for them to make changes. If they were it would have happened in 2007 or pick one of two or three other years in the 2000's.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 2:05 am to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
Why are we still talking about the Bama title? Didn't Urban, Kiffin, and SC do a great job of stilling the spotlight? 
Posted on 1/15/10 at 6:01 am to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:
You are welcome. You should write a book "Making Dumbass Posts for Dumbass People". It would sell easily like your sister or cousin at the Taco Bell on a Friday night.
Post incomprehensible and not worthy of a response.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 11:38 am to DatNotJuiceDatsGravy
quote:
Can you tell me where said trophy (one of LSU's) that belongs to your coach currently resides?
I'll make one guess: NOT in bama.
The coach's trophy belongs with the coach.
Saban left it in LSU for you guys since it marked the birth of your program.
Popular
Back to top

1





