Started By
Message
re: How many games did Newton make the difference in for AU last year?
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:29 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:29 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
He made a difference in all the games IMO. But the game that stands out to me is the LSU game. Don't think we could have pulled it off without him.
I'm sure you've seen it, but it never gets old
I'm sure you've seen it, but it never gets old
0
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:30 pm to TheJones
quote:
Auburn fricked around that entire game and still dominated. They were knocking idiots out left and right.
If they played hard in that game it would have been a blow out. I felt like Auburn was very classy by not going balls out and allowing UGA to keep the score kinda close
right, they were just fricking around in their last home game, the one that would clinch the west, and the one they were so emotional to have cam back after the investigation heated up. UGA came out firing on all cylinders. had we not laid off toward the end and gotten conservative the game would have been even closer, and its already a close game. just because the final reads 49-31 doesn't mean it wasn't a good game.
you can rant and rave about "not trying" but thats a piss poor argument. no cam = no win
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:31 pm to Damn Good Dawg
I agree. I think UGA wins that game if not for Cam.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:31 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
no cam = no win
But we had Cam and he just fricked around the whole game and wrecked your idiots.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:31 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
every game except that the two powder puff games against arkansas state and USC.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:32 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Who would of ever thought great players helps teams win. Amazing concept there. I think I'm going to become a college coach now that I'm in on the secret.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:33 pm to McKeezy
quote:
But we had Cam and he just fricked around the whole game and wrecked your idiots.
did you watch the same game? the 4th quarter was the only time you were wrecking anyone. because i mean for 3 quarters we made your secondary look like a fricking JV squad. so yea, the game was close. the OP asks what games cam was huge in AU winning and UGA is one of them.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:33 pm to Damn Good Dawg
It's always a good laugh when a fan of the losing team says "we fired on all cylinders" when they lost by 18 points.
Funny and pathetic really. Auburn dominated all around and wrecked idiots. Probably could have put up a 60-20 box score if they had some motivatiion and weren't playing a pretty shitty Georgia team.
Funny and pathetic really. Auburn dominated all around and wrecked idiots. Probably could have put up a 60-20 box score if they had some motivatiion and weren't playing a pretty shitty Georgia team.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:37 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
did you watch the same game?
obviously
quote:
because i mean for 3 quarters we made your secondary look like a fricking JV squad.
because we were just fricking around
quote:
the 4th quarter was the only time you were wrecking anyone.
thats when fricking around got boring
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:37 pm to TheJones
21-7, yea i'd say they were playing pretty damn good football. and you're an idiot if you base the game off that score. i guarantee you will find some sane auburn fans who said that game was close. they put those last 2 tds up in the last 6 min or so. that game was back and forth. no one was wrecking anyone. idk what is so god damn difficult for you to understand.
any dumb arse can say score board. UGA was hardly dominated until the end of the 4th when they finally wore down.
any dumb arse can say score board. UGA was hardly dominated until the end of the 4th when they finally wore down.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:38 pm to McKeezy
quote:
because we were just fricking around
horrible counter arguement quote:
thats when fricking around got boring
ok i admit thats funny
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:39 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Mississippi State as well.
This without a doubt. 17-14. If it weren't for cam leaning forward on every third down, Auburn might not have scored a point.
This post was edited on 4/25/11 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:41 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Auburn had no motivation. That game might as well have been a scrimmage. Think Auburn is going to get pumped up for a team that would go on to lose to Central Florida?
Get real chief. Auburn straight up wrecked idiots all around. When they got tired of fricking around they put the game away and won by 18 points.
It was easy
Get real chief. Auburn straight up wrecked idiots all around. When they got tired of fricking around they put the game away and won by 18 points.
It was easy
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:42 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
UGA was hardly dominated until the end of the 4th when Auburn quit fricking around and started wrecking idiots
Agreed.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:42 pm to TheJones
quote:
Auburn had no motivation. That game might as well have been a scrimmage. Think Auburn is going to get pumped up for a team that would go on to lose to Central Florida?
Get real chief. Auburn straight up wrecked idiots all around. When they got tired of fricking around they put the game away and won by 18 points.
It was easy
this is just an absolutely atrocious argument but if you chose to delude yourself then by all means go for it
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:43 pm to McKeezy
So Chizik reinforces "fricking around"? I would love to hear Chizik's response to someone asking him if his team was doing this.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:44 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
Damn Good Dawg
Yes. I think we beat Clemson, Kentucky, and UGA without Cam. What our offense would have done is tough to measure because we would be running literally a completely different O - it's not a matter of Caudle/Trotter not being able to do what Cam did - it is a matter of Cam doing different things than they would have. As awesome as Cam was, I think at times our offense became unbalanced because it was so reliant on him and that gummed up the gears sometimes.
And I would say that say that our production in our first 3 games would have been higher with Caudle or someone else at QB because we weren't using Cam in an effective way and were trying to call the traditional Malzahn plays with Cam. At that point, Cam's passing was still very shaky and we weren't exploiting him as a dual threat. From USC on we adapted the offense to let Cam light it up.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:44 pm to Damn Good Dawg
I'd be pretty irate too if my team got stomped out by Auburn and then a few weeks later got stomped out by the Central Florida frickheads or whatever they are.
Classic Georgia bullshite football
Classic Georgia bullshite football
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:46 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
So Chizik reinforces "fricking around"? I would love to hear Chizik's response to someone asking him if his team was doing this.
When you have a team that's as ripe for a fricking like Georgia, then it's absolutely appropriate to frick around a bit and have some fun. At the end of the game Auburn wrecked idiots and put the game away.
I don't see any issues with that
Posted on 4/25/11 at 1:47 pm to Tds & Beer
Without Cam at QB the game plan would have been totally different. After going 8-5, most felt Auburn would be improved. Cams coming out party was LSU. No way to predict, but I would say 10-2. The 2010 team had a lot of seniors and would be better than the 2011 team even without Cam. Sometimes when you have a great player, the other players watch and wait for them to make the play.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News