Started By
Message

re: How has Ole Miss not been attacked yet?

Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3013 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

The admin at Ole Miss turned into rational human beings



FIFY jackass
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64471 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

The song Dixie is not the issue.

It would be now. Anything with any link to the antebellum south is being censored and destroyed now. Liberal snowflakes are going to riot to remove Rebels before long, just watch
This post was edited on 6/6/20 at 4:40 pm
Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3013 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

The only thing left is their name, but I doubt people call that out with so much other stuff going on - like police brutality and institutionalized racism.


That's because a name change isn't necessary. Police brutality and systemic racism is the problem, a name change wont fix that.
Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3013 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

antebellum south is being censored and destroyed now



Antebellum south was a disgrace. Germany doesn't celebrate the swastika as part of their tradition or history because they know it was a shameful disgrace.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64471 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Police brutality and systemic racism is the problem, a name change wont fix that.

Tell that to Southern cities tearing down statues. Won’t fix anything. It’s “symbolic”
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64471 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Antebellum south was a disgrace. Germany doesn't celebrate the swastika as part of their tradition or history because they know it was a shameful disgrace.

GTFO
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Antebellum south was a disgrace. Germany doesn't celebrate the swastika as part of their tradition or history because they know it was a shameful disgrace.

At least we had good architecture. Nazi art and architecture was kitsch and garish for the most part
Posted by turnpiketiger
Southeast Texas
Member since May 2020
9420 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 8:47 pm to
Definitely not. Just common sense here. Mississippi state is a redneck farm school that has 1 tradition. Which is extremely annoying to the rest of the world.
Posted by InGAButLoveBama
Member since Jan 2018
924 posts
Posted on 6/6/20 at 11:12 pm to


quote:

re: How has Ole Miss not been attacked yet?Posted on 6/5/20 at 8:05 pm to turnpiketiger
quote:
Btw, I’m all for keeping Colonel Reb & the band playing Dixie. It’s TRADITION.

F*ck tradition

People in this Country to swear to defend the US against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC

col reb and that song dixie are associated with a domestic enemy to our Country from years gone by


1)The South seceded. It was not trying to overthrow the duly elected govt of the US. Thus it was not traitorous. The South was an independent nation. The founding fathers were clear in their writings that states had the right to secede because the states had formed the Union and not the other way around.

2) The South never intended to attack the remaining states of the US.
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19102 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 12:54 am to
When I was a toddler, I remember asking my dad if "Ole Miss" had anything to do with some lady. I did not know what it meant. He just laughed and said, "no". Said something to the effect that it was a name which showed love and respect for his school. He graduated from Ole Miss back in the 30's.
This post was edited on 6/7/20 at 7:48 pm
Posted by PokeyTiger
New Iberia
Member since Apr 2020
1968 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 1:07 am to
Little Arch is coming!
Posted by bandwagon bill
Hammond, LA
Member since Dec 2019
39 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 1:27 am to
I’m all for changing the mascot. That’s a positive thing for the university. A simple gesture that will go a long way.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Southeast Texas
Member since May 2020
9420 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

1)The South seceded. It was not trying to overthrow the duly elected govt of the US. Thus it was not traitorous. The South was an independent nation. The founding fathers were clear in their writings that states had the right to secede because the states had formed the Union and not the other way around. 2) The South never intended to attack the remaining states of the US.


This is the truth. Doesn’t fit their narrative though.
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21146 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 1:53 pm to
It didn't matter who fired first, Lincoln's intentions were to invade the south and put an end to the opposition for good. He wasn't playing nice. The best way to silence the opposition was having federal troops march down south and aim at anyone one had other ideas.

Lincoln at all costs had to keep the Union in tact. If that meant thousands died for nothing to preserve the Union then he would do it. He was a pragmatic president that would go above the law if necessary to keep the Union together.

Of course succession is illegal because no country is going to allow anyone to leave. Laws are shredded in that scenario. It is only legal if you win your independence.
Posted by PlateJohnsonIII
Member since Feb 2020
6159 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 2:37 pm to
It’s not the truth. The south knew full well they were going to war when they seceded and formed the confederacy.

The “they attacked first” angle is old confederate propaganda that closeted sympathizers like you still eat up.

Go actually read history books on the subject (not daughters of the confederacy websites).

The U.S. had no choice but to wage war to reign in the villainous confederacy. Without doing so, it would end up like a Korea situation with the confederacy being an isolated, hated country where its own citizens suffered and starved. The U.S. would eventually have to go to war to liberate the confederate states regardless if it they “let them secede” initially. Better to rip the bandaid off.

TLDR: Confederate leaders knew full well they were starting a war. The north striking first was just strategic on their part.
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
826 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

2) The South never intended to attack the remaining states of the US.


Am I missing something? Or are you saying they didn't expect war?

Fort Sumter
Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
5789 posts
Posted on 6/7/20 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

The song Dixie is not the issue.


The first song that President Lincoln asked the band to play after Lee”s surrender was Dixie. If its OK with Lincoln its OK with me.

LINK to Lincoln asks to hear DIXIE
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter