Started By
Message
re: Has Auburn closed the gap with BAMA?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to SanFranTiger
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to SanFranTiger
He is counting '04 auburn and '05 texas. Which is dumb because he wasn't the HC
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to SanFranTiger
quote:
Chizik has been undefeated 3 of the last 7 years
What? Wasn't he 5-19 at Iowa State and like 8-5 last year at Auburn?
2010- 12-0
2005- 14-0
2004- 13-0
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to SanFranTiger
04, 05, 10 (so far but this one isn't over)
In terms of regular seasons, he has three unbeaten years in which he was either DC or HC....
In terms of regular seasons, he has three unbeaten years in which he was either DC or HC....
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:59 pm to MattP598
Now Chizik's time as an assistant counts is this argument? Can we use Saban's time as an assistant at Michigan State and Ohio State as arguments?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:59 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
He is counting '04 auburn and '05 texas. Which is dumb because he wasn't the HC
Okay then, 50% of all seasons that Chizik has been the AU HC, he has had an undefeated regular season.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:59 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
He is counting '04 auburn and '05 texas. Which is dumb because he wasn't the HC
Yea, that is dumb. He probably did more actual coaching in 2004 and 2005 than this year. By the way you are welcome to pull up saban's career stats when he was an assistant or coordinator as well. I think the total is still 1.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:00 pm to MattP598
texas went 13-0 in 2005. Not 14-0. Only teams to go 14-0 are OSU in '02, Boise '09, and Bama '09
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:00 pm to nativetiger
Same for Saban at Alabama.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:06 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Um, yeah, sorry, I'm not counting coordinator records.
Plus, Chizik is undefeated at this point in the season, he still has to win two more games. Season ain't over.
Anyway, I still think Saban has the Bama program in better shape and is a better coach for the long term.
Of course, not really sure if the words "long term" and Saban should ever be used...
Plus, Chizik is undefeated at this point in the season, he still has to win two more games. Season ain't over.
Anyway, I still think Saban has the Bama program in better shape and is a better coach for the long term.
Of course, not really sure if the words "long term" and Saban should ever be used...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:28 pm to SanFranTiger
Of course I knew this would be turned into a pissing match by the likes of nievetiger and co. (a few BAMA fans took his bait). Two years ago the Iron Bowl was 36 - 0. I thought that that was enough of an indicatinon that one team was ahead of the other but some had to go the last 5,10,15 year series record route. Sorry about that. I wasnt asking who was the better school historically. This thread was not intended to be a pissing match/flame type thing. BAMA fans are sore and rationalizing the loss, Auburn fans are sky high and getting way ahead of themselves so I was really interested in how others saw the two schools for the immediate future. Thanks for those who gave honest unbiased opinions, even those that came from fans of one of the two schools.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:31 pm to 4nmylifetime
Due to the ever changing nature of the SEC due to parity (f*ck that word, FWIW), I wouldn't say either program is ever as far ahead, or behind, of the other as the fans of that program would like to think.
A player here or there can turn a 7-5 or 8-4 one year team into a conference champ the next.
The days of one team totally dominating may be gone.
A player here or there can turn a 7-5 or 8-4 one year team into a conference champ the next.
The days of one team totally dominating may be gone.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:48 pm to smelvis
quote:
The days of one team totally dominating may be gone.
agree 100% - the nature of our rivalry is liek a pedelum. it swings one way for a time, but always swings back the other way. i don't think their is a "Dominant Team" in the rivalry anymore. nor do I agree with one team closing a gap.
there is no Gap - if the history of the IB has shown anything at all - everything is out the window for that game - records, stats - all of it.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:50 pm to TiggerWoods
quote:
Yea they are good now, but in this millenium we have owned that shite.
past 30 years we have owned them. take bahr out of the record book (since they like saying what if auburn didnt have cam) and we OWN them.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:55 pm to toomersdrugs
quote:
past 30 years we have owned them. take bahr out of the record book (since they like saying what if auburn didnt have cam) and we OWN them.
How does one equate a player, who has played 12 games for one program, and a coach that coached 25 years at the other program, when making this argument?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:57 pm to toomersdrugs
12-9 before bear
6-19 during bear
17-12 since bear
only time yall have been better than us is with bear.
3-2 last 5 years
7-3 last 10 years
9-6 last 15 years
11-9 last 20 years
15-10 last 25 years
17-13 last 30 years
6-19 during bear
17-12 since bear
only time yall have been better than us is with bear.
3-2 last 5 years
7-3 last 10 years
9-6 last 15 years
11-9 last 20 years
15-10 last 25 years
17-13 last 30 years
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:58 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
How does one equate a player, who has played 12 games for one program, and a coach that coached 25 years at the other program, when making this argument?
both cheated to get where they got
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:03 pm to toomersdrugs
While Auburn has had the upper hand since 1999, Alabama was crippled to some extent from 2002-2006. Let's have this argument again in 10 years. Both programs will have been on equal footing, at least in what they're afforded in terms of program building.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:09 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Let's have this argument again in 10 years. Both programs will have been on equal footing, at least in what they're afforded in terms of program building.
these programs will never be on equal football. both will keep cheating, and both will keep being caught
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:23 pm to toomersdrugs
quote:
Has Auburn closed the gap with BAMA?
12-9 before bear
6-19 during bear
17-12 since bear
only time yall have been better than us is with bear.
3-2 last 5 years
7-3 last 10 years
9-6 last 15 years
11-9 last 20 years
15-10 last 25 years
17-13 last 30 years
Damn, I hate to fall into this so I'll make one post in regards to this type of argument from an Auburn fan. It's like how they always want to point out their record against Saban but fail to equate that he won 2 National and 3 SEC Titles in three of his wins against them. Last 30 years BAMA has 2 National and 4 SEC Titles. Yeah Auburn has 4 more wins against BAMA in that time frame but wouldnt you gladely trade 4 wins for the titles? It basicaly screams to me that head to head the teams have been fairly even but that when BAMA is good they have a great year. When Auburn is good they beat BAMA. The only thing Auburn has to show for their efforts since the title in the fifties is "Punt BAMA Punt".
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:25 pm to 4nmylifetime
Uhm......as a matter of note, Auburn has 5 SECC's during that time, are about to play for their 6th, and may win the NC this year.
That'd pretty much be even as an impartial bystander.
That'd pretty much be even as an impartial bystander.
Popular
Back to top


2


