Started By
Message
re: Georgia’s pathetic record- SEC protecting these wussies needs to end…
Posted on 6/9/22 at 7:38 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 6/9/22 at 7:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Losing a single game proves the flaws of your logic. Losing more than one destroys your logic.
Nonsensical.
quote:
Yep. 5 weeks is a lot of time for prep. Solid adjustments and better prepared backups improves outcomes.
Didn't adjust to Bama players in previous games but happened to adjust when the best players were out.
Not having your best players means you aren't the same team.
2
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:11 am to mbogo
quote:
Nonsensical
Are you admitting the most talented team doesn’t always win?
quote:
Didn't adjust to Bama players in previous games
We went from 1 week prep for game #1 to 5 for game #2.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 1:03 pm to DawgCountry
And our “midget” is at least 1/2 an inch taller than Bamas midget. Our midget didn’t choke like theirs did either. Georgia was the best team in the country the entire year. They easily beat teams like AU and UF that Bama struggled mightily with. They had a perfect regular season record while Bama let a weirdo cult in CS take them down. And they humbled Bama in the biggest game - the one that mattered- the national championship.
This post was edited on 6/11/22 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 5:49 am to djsdawg
quote:
Are you admitting the most talented team doesn’t always win?
Duh. You are saying that Bama would win more often against Georgia than they would lose.
quote:
We went from 1 week prep for game #1 to 5 for game #2.
I guess the Georgia coaches knew how talented Baam was, so they ignored Mich and put all of their effort into Bama.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:03 am to truth22
Baton Rouge?
The refs, always the refs with the pups.
The refs, always the refs with the pups.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:08 am to mbogo
quote:
Duh. You are saying that Bama would win more often against Georgia than they would lose.
Should with equal coaching, bounces, and reffing.
Bama got the bounces, but uga had the coaching.
quote:
guess the Georgia coaches knew how talented Baam was, so they ignored Mich and put all of their effort into Bama.
Playoff teams prep for all opponents. Plenty of time to do that, and much less needed for a team you just played.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:15 am to truth22
We had UGA two year's in a row during major rebuilding years after a long time of being on life support. SEC is conscience when making these decisions and it's 100% on purpose. There are no coincidences.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:21 am
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:31 am to CauleyHog
quote:
We had UGA two year's in a row during major rebuilding years after a long time of being on life support
So you played UGA during the two years where your team was considerably better than it had been in some time?
quote:
SEC is conscience when making these decisions and it's 100% on purpose. There are no coincidences.
What was the SEC trying to accomplish with this decision?
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:42 am to Dawgfanman
We were picked last Baw. Thank goodness for SP we improved tremendously and quickly.
Their goal was to give UGA an easier schedule therefore an easier path to Atlanta. Of course they wouldn't give you Bama, or at A&M who was picked to be 2nd in the west and who the SEC also desperately wants to succeed.
Two years in a row. You know it's bullshite.
Their goal was to give UGA an easier schedule therefore an easier path to Atlanta. Of course they wouldn't give you Bama, or at A&M who was picked to be 2nd in the west and who the SEC also desperately wants to succeed.
Two years in a row. You know it's bullshite.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:44 am
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:47 am to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Texas a&m hasn't even played in this game, nor come remotely close to playing in it.
Preach on my brother!!!
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:48 am to mbogo
A “healthy” Bama team didn’t beat A&M and struggled to beat UF, AU, LSU, & AR. They weren’t a great team and it’s not surprising that they lost to a great team in the game that mattered. What is surprising was UGA losing the SECC. Because of their body of work UGA could afford a bye. In the same since NFL teams that have locked up the #1 seed in the playoff lose to inferior teams in the final weeks because it doesn’t matter. If you’re going to say that A&M won “that day” and it means no more than that then you can’t be logically consistent and say that the SECC is any different.
If you’re not prepared to say that A&M should beat AL every time they played then you can’t assume AL would beat UGA
Every team every year can by supposition and conjecture, attempt to describe away every loss on their schedule.
Thinking AL beats UGA in the NC because of the the SECC is a coping mechanism.
If you’re not prepared to say that A&M should beat AL every time they played then you can’t assume AL would beat UGA
Every team every year can by supposition and conjecture, attempt to describe away every loss on their schedule.
Thinking AL beats UGA in the NC because of the the SECC is a coping mechanism.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:56 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
We face the best the west has to offer each year, that’s never TAMU. Meet us in the dome if you want some.
Boom
Posted on 6/12/22 at 8:07 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
Thinking AL beats UGA in the NC because of the the SECC is a coping mechanism.
agogo had his world demolished by the UGA backups beating Bama.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 8:19 am to BSherrill
There is no denying that GA has NOT been playing the best teams in the SEC for many years now due to scheduling. Dawgs are the one team I have been dying to go see and see on Kyle, too. If GA had the West schedule, no doubts the outcomes would be different.
Regardless, GA was absolutely the best team last year. Lets hope with realignment the scheduling is a bit more even weighted for GA moving forward. But until then, they can hide in the East along side Missouri, Tennessee and Vandy.
Regardless, GA was absolutely the best team last year. Lets hope with realignment the scheduling is a bit more even weighted for GA moving forward. But until then, they can hide in the East along side Missouri, Tennessee and Vandy.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 8:28 am to truth22
What's a fan of a middle of the pack SEC team doing whining about UGA's schedule? You think a trip to A&M would've stopped their championship last year? 
Posted on 6/12/22 at 9:55 am to FootsFanatic
quote:
There is no denying that GA has NOT been playing the best teams in the SEC for many years now due to scheduling.
So the complaint is basically that UGA doesn’t play Bama each year..
Posted on 6/13/22 at 2:14 am to djsdawg
quote:
Should with equal coaching, bounces, and reffing.
Bama got the bounces, but uga had the coaching.
Bama won with more equal players out.
Georgia's coaching depends on Bama losing players and your QB had a ball bounce right back into his hands after hitting the ground.
quote:
Playoff teams prep for all opponents. Plenty of time to do that, and much less needed for a team you just played.
They had 5 weeks in 2017. Seems like there is a correlation between their coaching superiority and Bama's injury situation.
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 2:29 am
Posted on 6/13/22 at 2:26 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
A “healthy” Bama team didn’t beat A&M and struggled to beat UF, AU, LSU, & AR.
True, and also irrelevant to the Bama/Georgia games.
quote:
If you’re not prepared to say that A&M should beat AL every time they played then you can’t assume AL would beat UGA
Bama and Georgia played twice, one a blowout win and the other a narrow loss with a number of starters out.
Bama outgained A&M 522 to 379
Posted on 6/13/22 at 2:35 am to mbogo
quote:
Bama and Georgia played twice, one a blowout win and the other a narrow loss
Bama win by 17 is a blowout.
Bama loss by 15 is a "narrow loss."
How do you miss the stupidity of this argument????
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:31 pm to mbogo
quote:
Bama won with more equal players out.
Bama only had more out using your demented homer criteria that argued that all of the uga players out weren’t really out.
quote:
They had 5 weeks in 2017. Seems like there is a correlation between their coaching superiority and Bama's injury situation.
Bama should have won that game by more than they did. It was close because of our coaching / extra prep time.
Page 24 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News