Started By
Message
re: Georgia fans: what's the in-state 'rivalry' with GT like for the fans?
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:08 am to gpburdell
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:08 am to gpburdell
quote:
Most people in the state don't realize that GT has a bigger economic impact than UGA does.
Also, more people apply to GT.
2023 GT received 52,354 applications and admitted more students than the previous year. 2024 UGA received 43,700.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:23 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
So the person who made a good living in the AD of Georgia Tech, played football at Tech and kept Tech student athletes academically eligible is a Dawg fan? Riiiiigghhhhhtttttt...
Only speaking about you…
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:30 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
The little bees are annoying, and if we lose to them it's fricking horrible. Thankfully that doesn't happen very often.
The North Avenue Trade school version of Yellow Jackets are just like the flying type of yellow jackets...in late August they will start to be a nuisance but come Thanksgiving weekend you only find them active in Georgia about once every 8 years...
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:32 am to Skeeter210
I've lived in ATL for almost 40 years within 4 or so miles from the Tech campus. It is without a doubt the #1 asset of the State of Georgia and it's not even close. Just ask Gov. Kemp and any CEO of a Georgia based fortune 500 company.
I was so happy for Tech, and their fans, this past Saturday.
That said, the Dawgs are currently the best college football program in the nation.
Bottom line is that it is a "unique" rivalry that is almost beside the point.
I was so happy for Tech, and their fans, this past Saturday.
That said, the Dawgs are currently the best college football program in the nation.
Bottom line is that it is a "unique" rivalry that is almost beside the point.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:38 am to Gunga Din
quote:
Again, this is what is fascinating about this rivalry historically. Georgia was both the "snob" school and the "cow college"... and Tech just appealed to nerds. I'm going to assume that any sidewalk fans that Tech developed came from "working class" people who didn't like the UGA "snob" contingent.
It’s kind of important to understand GA’s state history and dynamics, too: Tech was a post-Civil War answer to the problem of the Reconstruction South needing to modernize and keep up with the northeast. With Atlanta becoming the postwar capital of the state and the larger region of the country, Nathaniel Harris (a UGA grad and later governor) and John Hanson championed the idea from their homes in Macon. Tech was eventually signed into existence by Governor Henry McDaniel (a Mercer and UGA Law grad).
Tech was essentially a UGA invention in a time when the primary focus of UGA was to create lawmakers and businessmen and to manage ag interests in the state.That same dynamic has kind of persisted over time: UGA still almost quite literally runs the state via its extensive alumni network in law, business, ag, and journalism while Tech supplies the labor force necessary to continue being more than just a Birmingham or worse.
Too, UGA and Tech are a part of the same University system that governs 20+ schools (kind of a strange arrangement compared to a lot of other rival institutions that may accept state funds but otherwise operate independent of one another). There has long been some natural resentment of non-UGA institutions toward Athens because, effectively, we can kind of do what we want when we want if we so choose because the Governor is typically a UGA grad and most of the state Congress are UGA grads, as are many of the appointees to the University System Board of Regents. Understandably, if Tech feels slighted over non-football decision making they can usually argue a fair point of favoritism and that has kind of given their whole fanbase a permanent chip in their shoulder as it concerns UGA.
TLDR: Tech has never had an even playing field with UGA politically and never will
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:53 am to Gunga Din
quote:
You also have to throw in the the fact that Ga Tech, despite being the "little brother"... is located in the states' dominant and capital city and UGA was located in what was once the "backwater" college town.
But Atlanta hasn't always been the dominant and capital city. Until after the Civil War, Atlanta was really just a railroad junction town. Yes there was a population, but most of it was either concentrated around the center of the city or was well outside the city on the plantations. Atlanta didn't become the state capital until 1868, and Tech wasn't chartered until 1885 and didn't open until 1888.
While not a bustling metropolis until much more recently, Athens and UGA (chartered 1785) were not that distant from the state capital once it left Savannah for Augusta, and then Louisville, and finally Milledgeville as the interior of the state opened to settlement.
quote:
There is no way that Ga Tech gets the typical rural support that is usually associated with a "little brother" Ag school.
It doesn't. The rural areas of the state are definitely Dawg country either as ag school alums or sidewalk fans. Those who aren't either typically are ag school alums of the land grand schools in the surrounding states (Auburn, Clemson, etc.).
More recently a good portion of Tech's student body are Asians or other foreign nationals who get their degrees and leave not only the state but many times the country after graduation. I do think that as time goes on, the GT alumni base, especially within the state, will get smaller and the percentage that care about football maybe even smaller than that.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:54 am to Gunga Din
quote:
Georgia had the Ag/small town people... and picked up the standard sidewalk fans because of their success. All Tech had going for it was its Atlanta location... bit Athens isn't far away so it wasn't a huge advantage like it might have been if UGA had been located in say Valdosta
UGA also has longevity in its favor. It was chartered in 1785 from Savannah and started classes when Athens was settled after the Oconee Wars with the Creek Indians in 1801.
Atlanta didn’t become the capital of the state until 1868 and Tech didn’t start classes until 1888. That’s almost a centuries difference in the formation of UGA as a concept in the public mind. There are still a lot of people in the state who are third and fourth generation UGA grads and a TON of towns around the state that identify as UGA towns because of Ag extension programs that have been running for 200+ years or because town leadership (mayors, reverends, local lawyers) all returned home from Athens to open practice. Tech just never had that same cultural cache with the people of the state despite being kind of integral to its function in the twentieth century onward.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 11:54 am to AwgustaDawg
There is no “dark reason” that athletes at Tech have trouble or any other type of sinister motive. The issue is limited degree offerings. A top 30 business undergrad degree is “ridiculed” as the athlete degree. We don’t have an underwater basket weaving degree like many flagship schools where we can hide athletes. IIWII.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 12:47 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
It doesn't. The rural areas of the state are definitely Dawg country either as ag school alums or sidewalk fans. Those who aren't either typically are ag school alums of the land grand schools in the surrounding states (Auburn, Clemson, etc.).
I grew up in northwest GA just outside of Dalton. You're right that GT fans were basically non-existent when I was growing up. The only GT fan I can remember was my high school biology teacher as she was an alum. I didn't become a GT fan till I decided that was where I was going to school. I remember there being a fair number of Tenn fans being that close to the border.
quote:
More recently a good portion of Tech's student body are Asians or other foreign nationals who get their degrees and leave not only the state but many times the country after graduation. I do think that as time goes on, the GT alumni base, especially within the state, will get smaller and the percentage that care about football maybe even smaller than that.
While true we have alot of international/asian students that doesn't mean they can't be football fans. I'm asian btw (born in the US) and I've been a season ticket holder since I graduated for almost 25 years now. At least since the mid 90s, GT has always had a significant number of international/asian students.
Back when I graduated, GT had less than 10k undergrads. We're at 20k undergrads now and 65% are from in state. As GT's reputation has grown, more students than ever in state want to attend.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 2:02 pm to gpburdell
Georgia Institute of Technology - Main Campus reports having a total of 9,837 international students on campus, 1,520 of whom are undergraduates. This is out of a total of 39,771 students, 16,561 of whom are undergraduates.
I’m not sure how that compares to other schools?
I’m not sure how that compares to other schools?
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:01 am to GTnerd
quote:
We8ve been just as competitive as the rest of the SEC vs. yall in the Kirby era (minus Bama)
That’s not true at all.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:33 am to tylerdurden24
I'd like to thank the last few contributors to this thread for the background info on UGA and Tech.
I have always been fascinated by the dynamics of in state college football rivalries and this one is rather unique in the entire country.
I did want to address the comment about Atlanta not being "the big city" in Georgia originally. While I learned something...
My question would be more related to wondering as to whether Tech ever had an advantage in terms of garnering fans due to their location once Atlanta became the dominant city.
Today, I can't see that Tech's location in Atlanta makes any difference in who roots for who. I was just curious if it did say back when Tech was an SEC team and schools were basically developing generational fan bases.
I have always been fascinated by the dynamics of in state college football rivalries and this one is rather unique in the entire country.
I did want to address the comment about Atlanta not being "the big city" in Georgia originally. While I learned something...
My question would be more related to wondering as to whether Tech ever had an advantage in terms of garnering fans due to their location once Atlanta became the dominant city.
Today, I can't see that Tech's location in Atlanta makes any difference in who roots for who. I was just curious if it did say back when Tech was an SEC team and schools were basically developing generational fan bases.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 12:24 pm to RunningJacket
Hey you, Tech idiot!
Why don’t you visit a Barnes and Noble? Georgias Malcom Mitchell is now a published author and his books can be found there. He learned to love reading after he received the help he needed to achieve the academic potential that he had all along.
He is now an advocate for advancing children’s education and provides programs and seminars to young people as well as writing books to inspire them. He is helping struggling children receive the help that he was denied before coming to UGA. He is a great man who is doing good work.
GT has been slandering him for years. Guess that’s what having a huge inferiority complex will do to fans of a losing program like the North Atlanta Trade School. You must know that schools are probably still allowed to have a certain number of signees who don’t have the best academic record. Tech can strut and puff out their chest all they want, but they take these players too. And if any High 4 or 5 star even gave GT a hopeful sign of committing, as unbelievable as that would be, they would declare him a rocket scientist and move heaven and earth to get him enrolled. It’s true and you know it.
But carry in with your little fantasy, you small little jealous insect. We Dawgs are very proud of our Malcom. He is a true success story
Why don’t you visit a Barnes and Noble? Georgias Malcom Mitchell is now a published author and his books can be found there. He learned to love reading after he received the help he needed to achieve the academic potential that he had all along.
He is now an advocate for advancing children’s education and provides programs and seminars to young people as well as writing books to inspire them. He is helping struggling children receive the help that he was denied before coming to UGA. He is a great man who is doing good work.
GT has been slandering him for years. Guess that’s what having a huge inferiority complex will do to fans of a losing program like the North Atlanta Trade School. You must know that schools are probably still allowed to have a certain number of signees who don’t have the best academic record. Tech can strut and puff out their chest all they want, but they take these players too. And if any High 4 or 5 star even gave GT a hopeful sign of committing, as unbelievable as that would be, they would declare him a rocket scientist and move heaven and earth to get him enrolled. It’s true and you know it.
But carry in with your little fantasy, you small little jealous insect. We Dawgs are very proud of our Malcom. He is a true success story
Posted on 8/30/24 at 12:39 pm to Gunga Din
Atlanta is a city dominated by UGA fans. GT can’t fill their tiny stadium unless UGA or Clemson is visiting and even then the place is a sea of red or orange. If they draw 20,000 any other time it’s a great day. Georgia takes over their place when we have to visit that rusty old hulk and the few GT fans who actually show up are usually gone long before the 3rd quarter is over. Wonder why? lol
Athens is the #1 college town in the nation and Atlanta is our second home.
Bobby Dodd is often referred to at Athens West ~ like UGA would actually want to own that dreary old place - and Mercedes Benz should be renamed since UGA plays there in championship games so often.
Athens is the #1 college town in the nation and Atlanta is our second home.
Bobby Dodd is often referred to at Athens West ~ like UGA would actually want to own that dreary old place - and Mercedes Benz should be renamed since UGA plays there in championship games so often.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 12:38 pm to Gunga Din
quote:
My question would be more related to wondering as to whether Tech ever had an advantage in terms of garnering fans due to their location once Atlanta became the dominant city. Today, I can't see that Tech's location in Atlanta makes any difference in who roots for who. I was just curious if it did say back when Tech was an SEC team and schools were basically developing generational fan bases
Atlanta quickly turned into the poster child for white flight in the mid 20th century; most Tech grads lived in the suburbs with the UGA grads and only commuted into Atlanta for work/games. Atlanta is the black Nashville for a reason - when white people vacated to the perimeter and beyond, black culture was able to fill the void and HBCUs like Morehouse, Clark-Atlanta, and Morris Brown became the football focus of those who lived in the city proper. Keep in mind, the Falcons didn’t arrive to Atlanta until the mid 60s so college football allegiances were kind of what you had. Braves didn’t even arrive until the mid 60s. I’ll mention, too, that Georgia State didn’t start up until 1913 and was a commuter college and night school for most of its existence until the last 15 years when they started football so Tech may hve had some alumni representation in Decatur and Avondale Estates and Druid Hills and Grant Park neighborhoods but it paled in comparison to its suburban base and definitely wasn’t as strong as the HBCU representation of the average Atlanta resident.
This post was edited on 9/2/24 at 12:44 pm
Popular
Back to top
