Started By
Message
re: For all the criticism of the CFP, I think we can call the winner the conclusive Champ.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:20 am to 49 to nada
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:20 am to 49 to nada
quote:meh...2019 went 15-0 with a killer schedule...
but this season's champion will be tested like none before.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:34 am to SemperFiDawg
quote:Definitive how? Outside of the four conference champions, you have a committee deciding who is allowed to play in the tournament.
Statistically, during the CFP, even the 4th ranked team had no shot.
You may be correct or incorrect, but without the CFP model it's another untested assumption. With the model, you will have a more definitive answer.
How is that different from a committee deciding, after a 12-game season and a bowl game, which team is the champion?
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:49 am to jangalang
quote:
Indiana, SMU, Boise, Notre Dame, Arizona State, Penn State
Teams that have the talent:
Bama (discrepancies at QB)
Georgia (holes at QB/WR)
Texas (holes at RB)
Ohio State (hole at HC, QB)
I guess Oregon sits there with no immediate holes but no big wins since they needed to bushleague the rule book to beat OhioState.
So they are all mediocre?

My point is that there is no way to determine which team is best, so we might as well cast with a bigger net since there are over a hundred teams and give people a chance. I think it is just as important that some of the teams from "lesser" conferences get a playoff berth, rather than keep them out because they might upset a true title contender. These teams deserve to have the playoff experience. The bowls are antiquated the way they are. They can host all the playoff games now and there will be much more interest and probably close to zero opt outs.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 12:12 pm to bigDgator
I have said several times the past couple months there is no real alpha team right now. Couldve been Texas but then they lost to Georgia. Could've been Georgia if they had a legit passing game like last year. Couldve been Bama if they had better decision making.
Regardless adding bunch of teams to the CFP that proved less in the season doesn't make it any better. A field of 4 or 6 would've been fine.
Regardless adding bunch of teams to the CFP that proved less in the season doesn't make it any better. A field of 4 or 6 would've been fine.
This post was edited on 12/16/24 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:09 pm to bigDgator
quote:Oregon is the only undefeated team. A win in their bowl game (under the old pre-BCS system) and they are the undisputed champion.
My point is that there is no way to determine which team is best
The BCS and the playoffs are unnecessary and even a detriment to college football.
The old 12-game entire season "playoff" is what made college football king.
All the playoffs do is water down the product and make it just like the NFL.
The 12-game season and bowl games are what separated college football from the NFL and the main reason why it was so much better.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:13 pm to MtVernon
quote:
quote:
For all the criticism of the CFP, I think we can call the winner the conclusive Champ.
unless its Texas.
That is correct. No team that loses twice to the same team in a season can be a legit champ
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:22 pm to SemperFiDawg
quote:Yeah! Now let’s replicate at the high school level. We must know who the National champion is! There are too many competing claims ever year
exactly what I have wanted ever since I was a child: a true playoff format where an undisputed winner could be crowned. That's a good thing.

Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:31 pm to SemperFiDawg
The cfp basically made it where games during the season didn't count. Add more teams and it will mean even less.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:55 pm to BFANLC
quote:Here's a scenario for ya...
The cfp basically made it where games during the season didn't count. Add more teams and it will mean even less.
SEC Team rests its first and second string players during non-conference games - loses all four of them - then goes 7-1 in conference play and wins the SECCG.
SEC Team not only goes to the playoffs with a 7-5 regular season record, but also earns a first-round bye as the conference champ.
Yay, progress.
This post was edited on 12/16/24 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 12/16/24 at 4:29 pm to BFANLC
fairly certain that the Vandy and Oklahoma games counted
Posted on 12/16/24 at 4:44 pm to labamafan
quote:
4 was perfect
I loved the BCS but was ok with the 4 teams as well.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 5:14 pm to jangalang
quote:
Indiana, SMU, Boise, Notre Dame, Arizona State, Penn State
These teams getting no respect. Duly noted. I’m gonna lmfao if one of them wins it.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 5:25 pm to BFANLC
quote:
The cfp basically made it where games during the season didn't count. Add more teams and it will mean even less.
As an Ole Miss fan, that UK game meant a lot. The UF game mattered.
That Bama loss to OU mattered.
Regular season games matter more, for more programs, under the new structure.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 5:55 pm to SemperFiDawg
Every team had their chance. That’s what we were looking for.
Also, 12 teams is too many
Also, 12 teams is too many
Posted on 12/16/24 at 6:02 pm to 49 to nada
quote:
The last one standing will be the most legit national champion ever imo.
It will be particularly true if UGA wins it.
UGA would end up 7-0 against teams in the playoff including the regular season, the SECCG and the playoff.
And while UGA would have two losses to non-playoff teams, both of those losses would be on the road and to teams ranked 11th and 14th in the final playoff rankings.
14-2, 7-0 vs playoff teams, 9 games against ranked opponents.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 6:40 pm to SemperFiDawg
quote:
For all the criticism of the CFP, I think we can call the winner the conclusive Champ.
In one sense, it has ALWAYS been conclusive since the BCS ended the poll era. The winning team won on the field by the rules in place. Same will happen now.
However, the "playoff winner vs best team" or "playoff winner vs team with best overall season" debates will often increase instead of decrease.
There will be years where a 3 loss team beats a 15-0 team in an OT final (maybe even the team they've already lost to twice that year).
The 12-3 team will be conclusive champion instead of the 15-1 team just like in the NFL or NCAA basketball tourney.
But, it really won't be much different than it's been since the 1990s.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 6:44 pm to SemperFiDawg
Dude, you just set of a bomb inside that guys head…
Great synopsis!
Great synopsis!
Posted on 12/16/24 at 6:48 pm to SemperFiDawg
Bama fans losing it… bwahaha
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:25 pm to theRealJesseD
quote:
fairly certain that the Vandy and Oklahoma games counted
The Bama game didn't count for you, or the ole miss game. If Bama had lost just ok and vandy those wouldn't have counted either.
So at what point do games matter/don't matter? Is it 3 losses? 4?
Let's add more teams and make it an even half dozen losses.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:55 pm to SemperFiDawg
It ain’t perfect and they still need to make some tweaks, but I’m glad it’s no longer a beauty contest.
And yeah you can probably figure out who’s the best from the top 4 but it was criminal that undefeated FSU got left out last year. It’d be like Georgia getting left out because Beck got hurt.
The more you can move the decision from the idiots with opinions and settle things on the field the better.
And though I think college football should be split into two divisions, until it is then I’m glad the smaller schools get a shot to play for something. Anyway remember when Marshall was the hot program with Leftwich, Pennington, Randy Moss, etc? Would’ve been fun to see what they could do in a playoff.
And yeah you can probably figure out who’s the best from the top 4 but it was criminal that undefeated FSU got left out last year. It’d be like Georgia getting left out because Beck got hurt.
The more you can move the decision from the idiots with opinions and settle things on the field the better.
And though I think college football should be split into two divisions, until it is then I’m glad the smaller schools get a shot to play for something. Anyway remember when Marshall was the hot program with Leftwich, Pennington, Randy Moss, etc? Would’ve been fun to see what they could do in a playoff.
Popular
Back to top
