Started By
Message

re: For all of the derelicts on this site, let me clear some things up for you

Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:24 am to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Deep analysis. A player who signs a contract with, practices with, plays games with, and represents an NFL team, is not an NFL player.


Apparently not seeing as players who sign a contract with, practice with, play games with, and represents an NBA team, is not an NBA player.

Allowing G-League players back is one of the reasons the SEC is getting dick slapped for trying to prevent NFL preseason players from returning.

Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:

You don't even remotely know or understand what the lawsuit is about.


I understand much better than you. You can’t even properly identify the plaintiffs in the hearing from yesterday.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:26 am
Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
9014 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:28 am to
Prove me wrong. You can't. Brent Austin, a former cb from Cal was cut from the Broncos after the last preseason game. Is he now a former NFL player ? No, LOL.
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1194 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:


I understand much better than you. You can’t even properly identify the plaintiffs in the hearing from yesterday.


You just demonstrated that you don't understand the case.

It's not an eligibility case at a higher level.

This is a case to determine if conferences are allowed to have their own rules.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:30 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:31 am to
quote:

You just demonstrated that you don't understand the case.

It's not an eligibility case at a higher level.

This is a case to determine if conferences are allowed to have their own rules.


You can’t even figure out which case I’m referring to.

Hint: it’s not the one filed by the SEC
Posted by Boom33
Member since Jul 2026
1194 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:43 am to
quote:


You can’t even figure out which case I’m referring to.

Hint: it’s not the one filed by the SEC



Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6874 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:58 am to
Add to this that if the Amateurism Blanket rule was actively in effect and fully binding, the players could not have legally entered the portal, and teams couldn't touch them. But the NCAA allowed them into the portal.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter