1
Started By
Message
re: Federal Judge rules NCAA is not subject to Title IX
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:26 pm to winkchance
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:26 pm to winkchance
quote:
SO all the men's sports that were killed was what?
??
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:32 pm to jonnyanony
I think he’s asking if you can now have more men’s sports than women. I would enjoy men’s soccer and wrestling. Title IX was always an excuse to not have those teams.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:34 pm to stitchop
quote:
the dismissals were based on a state law, the matter of Title 9 was not adressed
Yes. The state law makes the application of title IX moot. A GA school must designate the sport by biological sex and once designated can’t roster a person of the opposite sex. The plaintiffs have full relief; there is no title IX issue to decide against UGa or Ga Tech. The plaintiffs have a statutory home run
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:37 pm to TROJANFORCEONE
quote:
I think he’s asking if you can now have more men’s sports than women.
Always could. There's just a trade-off.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:39 pm to jonnyanony
Again, I went to AU. Can you elaborate?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:45 pm to TROJANFORCEONE
The only institutions bound by Title IX are those that receive federal funding (not just schools).
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:47 pm to TROJANFORCEONE
quote:
think he’s asking if you can now have more men’s sports than women. I would enjoy men’s soccer and wrestling. Title IX was always an excuse to not have those teams
This case makes no changes to Grove City or the legislative clarification Civil Rights restoration Act. Thus indirect funding through student assistance still makes the entire university subject to Title IX.
The test for substantial proportionality established by Cohen is still the major way most schools comply with Title IX. ( Three Part Test) The House settlement reads on that situation but this case does not in any way read on it.
I think the misunderstanding may be because the Ga schools were dismissed, people are erroneously coming to the conclusion that title IX doesn’t apply to schools.
What happened was very specific relief was plead against those schools and you didn’t have to get your title IX interpretation. The statute gave them everything they asked for in relation to GA and GaTech.
To analogize, if a play is blown dead for a false start and the lineman purportedly holds a defender after the whistle, the holding is moot because the play is dead
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:03 pm to TROJANFORCEONE
quote:
Again, I went to AU. Can you elaborate?
There are three ways OCR can determine if you are complying with Title IX
1) The number of male and female athletes is substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments; or
(2) The institution has a history and continuing practice of expanding participation opportunities responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex; or
(3) The institution is fully and effectively accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.
The first one is the most accounting based one but the House settlement changes to roster size, revenue sharing and back pay present Title IX issues. These are getting sorted out with cases like Schroeder
Indeed, House could end up with newer male sports cuts and more female sport opportunities to make the accounting under Test 1 to work. Of course, if the athletes become employees Title IX may not apply and Title VII would be the governing statute
This case has nothing to do with that though. It’s about men playing women’s sports which is now unlawful in GA
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:17 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
he idea of suing the school, in that they have to abide by Title IX has already been shut down
When? Private right of action has been and still is an option for redress.
i meant in relevance to this case
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:19 pm to stitchop
the NCAA is asinine and redundant. useless. don't want to break a thesaurus out for more adjectives. it serves no purpose. the schools themselves are still subject to title 9, and it's the schools themselves that have the power now
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:20 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
So silly imo
Everyone that is part of the NCAA is profiting, including the players now … but it’s a “non-profit organization” lol. Make it make sense.
Revenue != Profit.
Players are a cost.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:21 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Thus case has nothing to do with that though. It’s about men playing women’s sports which is now unlawful in GA
this is the truth, however this judge is trying to cut off avenues of these women to seek redress.
Also, the idea that a person is ok with a school counting men as women to satisfy equality is insanity
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:22 pm to RockyRococco
quote:
the NCAA is asinine and redundant. useless. don't want to break a thesaurus out for more adjectives. it serves no purpose. the schools themselves are still subject to title 9, and it's the schools themselves that have the power now
The NCAA is a voluntary organization that represents the schools.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:27 pm to stitchop
The NCAA isn’t subject to Title IX, but its member institutions are (if they receive federal education funds).
Hillsdale College does not accept federal funds.
Hillsdale College does not accept federal funds.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:34 pm to stitchop
quote:
this is the truth, however this judge is trying to cut off avenues of these women to seek redress.
If they are in any of the other 49 states then they still have a private right of action. The private right of action was established in Cannon and extended to sexual harassment in Jackson
Of course it would potentially become moot everywhere if the federal version of the Riley Gaines Act is passed
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:52 pm to stitchop
quote:
Judge Tiffany R. Johnson
Joe was unquestionably senile at the time of this appointment.
quote:
On July 31, 2024, President Joe Biden nominated Johnson to serve as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
They will go narrow or broad with interpretations to fit political agenda. If this had been a lawsuit pushing gender identity protection to allow men in women’s sports under Title IX it likely would have been a different ruling even though gender identity is not in the actual law.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 1:55 pm to dallastigers
imagine the perversity and misogyny towards young girls and women involved in saying that you can count boys as girls.
Misogyny is fundamentally defined as hatred, contempt, or ingrained prejudice against women. This aligns directly with the concept of disdain, as the term encompasses not only active hatred but also deep-seated disrespect, belittlement, and discrimination based on gender.
Misogyny is fundamentally defined as hatred, contempt, or ingrained prejudice against women. This aligns directly with the concept of disdain, as the term encompasses not only active hatred but also deep-seated disrespect, belittlement, and discrimination based on gender.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:28 pm to stitchop
quote:
To the extent a court determines that an NCAA policy imposed by a college or university violates Title IX, a college or university enforcing that policy could be found in violation of Title IX
So you're saying an entity that is legally bound by Title IX could be found in violation of Title IX if they explicitly violate Title IX?
This changes everything.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:34 pm to stitchop
We do not live in a judicial dictatorship.
Dumbass judges have gone insane the past 5-6 years. "No Kings" indeed...but that should be directed towards the unelected judicial bureaucracy littered with robed morons.
Dumbass judges have gone insane the past 5-6 years. "No Kings" indeed...but that should be directed towards the unelected judicial bureaucracy littered with robed morons.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:01 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
So you're saying an entity that is legally bound by Title IX could be found in violation of Title IX if they explicitly violate Title IX? This changes everything
What I am saying is that judges are finding ways to prevent women from suing.
The state universities are going get suits dismissed for immunity, they will have to sue individuals.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News