dukkbill
| Favorite team: | Auburn  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1127 |
| Registered on: | 8/16/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
One day after Microsoft outage. Hmmm.
Did Flight Simulator go down?
0
quote:
What is a covered building?
Housing authority maintains a list and a property owner can appeal being on the list.
First it must have 4 or more units. Then it has to be in one of four categories
- already part of an alternative enforcement program
- have active class b or class c violations of an amount equal to 1 per unit
- have a public tax lien or active foreclosure
- have expiring affordability agreements with housing
There are some owner occupied exclusions as well
In other words, what we use to call a slum
re: Most shocking wins in Auburn history
Posted by dukkbill on 10/21/26 at 4:01 pm to AUTiger789
For me it was 1990 Fla State. We were ranked higher but Fla State had our number during my undergrad years. They choked some games but late 80s Fla State was deep and talented. I thought we were jinxed against them.
It was very satisfying to pull out a win
It was very satisfying to pull out a win
Saw the Rolling Stones there
re: Teams that feel they should play UF every year
Posted by dukkbill on 10/19/26 at 8:47 am to Go Go Gata
I’d like
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Every year
Rotate in one of the SWC or big 8 schools and play a ten game schedule
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Every year
Rotate in one of the SWC or big 8 schools and play a ten game schedule
quote:
guess it could be like a just curious type of question, but is it common for press secretaries to be licensed attorneys?
Most went to journalism school. Jake Siewert went to Boalt but didn’t graduate
quote:
What kind of Trump supporter is Matt? He's the type of Trump supporter who bitches and complains about everything Trump does for days on end and says that Trump has to pay his wife money to spend holidays with him. THAT is the type of Trump supporter Matt is.
I don't get in the personality stuff too much, but similar to you, I find Matt to be a good poster. Threads started by either of you tend to mature into very good discussions, until and unless, someone jumps in to try to change things to make it about themselves.
I always take Matt's points as someone who heavily policies his own house. That is, if we were on a project or matter together, I expect he'd be on my arse more than Jiminy Cricket, but he'd defend me in every ethical way possible.
re: That was fast: California Bar Complaint Already Filed Against New Press Secretary
Posted by dukkbill on 10/15/26 at 8:29 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
How can the bar do anything to her if she isn’t licensed?
The state bar can send cease and desist letters and pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 6126.3 obtain specific relief for affected clients
As noted previously, the latter appears to be in cases where there are practices with active client matters
quote:.
wouldn't have mattered at all in relation to this stuff either way.
Agree. Its a good find and discussion, but probably doesn’t impact the complaint
I also agree that right now this appears benign. It doesn’t look like she was deceiving or providing bad service to anyone
Charities need help and many may give titles to attract pro bono or limited cost services. It doesn’t sound like they think they were bamboozled based on the record this far
re: That was fast: California Bar Complaint Already Filed Against New Press Secretary
Posted by dukkbill on 10/14/26 at 9:22 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
California (like Louisiana) licenses you as an “attorney and counselor.”
California gives you a wall plaque with those words on it, but its license is to practice law. Indeed, California”s on rules of Professional conduct use the term “lawyer”. See Rule 5.5
It seems the state is only pursuing serious actions against those with a bit more though. Recent cases are when people had signage with Law offices and were soliciting clients (eg landlord tenant, immigration, etc). anything more than censure will probably require more context
quote:
has had the LOSP program "forever." Is there a program where someone doesn't have to take the bar?
Yes. Wisconsin has a diploma priviledge. Utah, Oregon and Washington allow with supervised practice. South Dakota has a public service program. Those five all have entry ways with no bar exam in any state
Arizona has a supervised program if you narrowly fail the bar, but you still have to take the exam once
California, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington have no law school options for sitting for the bar exam. In WA you can’t double up though. You can go no bar or no law school but not both
NY and Maine have partial law school tracks, but you still must pass the bar
quote:
foghat
Take it easy.
re: Leaked text message debacle at Michigan: TE shits all over OC in group chat
Posted by dukkbill on 10/7/26 at 7:47 am to The Third Leg
quote:
His backup, Hiter, is a 5* true freshman, #1RB in the class who could have gone anywhere.
Are they going to use him in a Blitzkreig package?
re: Truth, not victory, should be the purpose of argument
Posted by dukkbill on 10/4/26 at 10:41 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Again, sorry for the self-indulgence, but they're are others in the same boat
Self indulgence should be fine. You have people engaging with you in your points. In fact that ratio is pretty high here in Sunday morning. We also will all have aspects of the environment that we don’t like. My bugaboo is those that jump in a good thread and try to make it all about themselves. Others will have different things they don’t like
If your seeking “the truth” you will find it, at least in what you perceive it to be. But if you want someone to curate it for you, then there are places and services for that which operate differently than a public board
quote:
you just skip to “you’re wrong you stupid bitch” it CAN be an indication of losing the debate, but isn’t necessarily so. It could just be an accurate descriptor.
And it can be very funny, as seen with the old Akroyd and Curtain sketches on Saturday Night Live
There is one poster here who will make substantive arguments and throw in the insult “dummy”. I always read that as Fred Sanford talking to LaMont
re: Truth, not victory, should be the purpose of argument
Posted by dukkbill on 10/4/26 at 10:16 am to LemmyLives
quote:
rather be shown to be wrong here so I am not wrong 350 times in real life
I don’t think inaccuracy here is negatively correlated with inaccuracy elsewhere. It’s not a classroom. Motivations will range from venting to socialization, and in some cases true organizing
re: Useful Observation for discussions on PoliBoard: use of slander = admission of defeat
Posted by dukkbill on 10/4/26 at 9:50 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:quote:You're correct. Thanks
Socrates never said it
You can always go to the wisdom of Billy Jeff Clinton instead
quote:
Politics is a contact sport
And less admirably
quote:
You better put some ice on that
Participating in the public sphere is different than other forms of rhetorical exchange
quote:
WashU proud
Go Bears
quote:
don’t look at the rankings/lists much so you may be right but I always thought of UChicago as a borderline Ivy League type school while northwestern as close but not quite that level.
I agree. Bunch of Disney Wildcats at Northwestern :)
re: Reflecting Pool Case Dismissed with Prejudice: No evidence of a crime
Posted by dukkbill on 10/1/26 at 1:22 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Pirro request a dismissal with prejudice?
There was an express request to dismiss without prejudice. NACDL has a copy. It’s on the top of second page and in p.18
As I mentioned above if it was not so overtly written as “this is DOIs” fault, it would be easier to argue that contractor liability is an alternate theory and the burdensome restriction on the people to never be able to refile is contrary to the interests of justice and ultra vires to the judges discretion under Rinaldi
quote:
If not, i would want to appeal because having this as any sort of precedent is troubling. The judge clearly doesnt like trump's politicization of the matter. But so what? To put it simply and half-arse way - A lot of investigations and charges are politicized, that doesnt mean a Judge can bar a prosecution because of it
Agree, it’s the proposition that’s troubling even if the outcome is ok. There are a couple of '1 pros plus threat' cases at the DDC that were dismissed with prejudice, but none at a higher level. Moreover, it’s, imho,distinguishable between an overt threat and a dissatisfied President
Popular
8
