Started By
Message
Everybody forgetting why we have this shitty playoffs format
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:04 pm
"BCS computers are biased" 
"You shouldn't be in if you don't win your conference."
"Refs favoring certain teams" myth
:[ images of shite just spraying everywhere ].jpg:
Thank you to those idiots whoever said this back over the last 15 years and helped perpetuate what we're seeing now.
"You shouldn't be in if you don't win your conference."
"Refs favoring certain teams" myth
:[ images of shite just spraying everywhere ].jpg:
Thank you to those idiots whoever said this back over the last 15 years and helped perpetuate what we're seeing now.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 8:05 pm
12
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:05 pm to theballguy
Well if they had done the right thing and put in Oklahoma State we wouldn’t have this problem. Don’t forget your coach not even ranking them third.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:06 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
Well if they had done the right thing and put in Oklahoma State we wouldn’t have this problem.
It really is this isn't it?
I do appreciate your honesty 
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:07 pm to theballguy
The right teams are in per BCS except for the 2 G5 teams
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:08 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
Don’t forget your coach not even ranking them third.
It was the system. Coaches had a vote that they never should have but I doubt his one vote put that in place.
Anyways, like a moth to fricking flame
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:08 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
The right teams are in per BCS except for the 2 G5 teams
1 hundo agree. The other two should be ND and BYU (though I wouldn't mind a play-in of Texas and BYU :dunno)
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:09 pm to theballguy
21-0
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:10 pm to GeauxBurrow312
Let’s say they put in Notre game and Texas. Wouldn’t Vanderbilt still have a gripe? Nevertheless, any of those teams would be better than James Madison or Tulane. Somebody’s always gonna be left out there maybe should be in there, but it’s ridiculous to put in teams that have no business being there.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:10 pm to theballguy
quote:
"You shouldn't be in if you don't win your conference."
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:12 pm to theballguy
You have this because they know the G schools will sue them if they’re excluded…..and win
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:12 pm to Lynxrufus2012
Good point.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:13 pm to theballguy
It was mainly just fans from the shitty conferences wasn't it? I don't remember many SEC fans vehemently railing against the BCS.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:13 pm to theballguy
quote:In my (very) biased opinion, yes.
It really is this isn't it?
That is where it all started.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:14 pm to Drewbie
quote:
I don't remember many SEC fans vehemently railing against the BCS.
Oh I do.
Mostly LSU fans.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:14 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
In my (very) biased opinion, yes.
That is where it all started.
Thank you. I do appreciate you guys' honest opinions here
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:15 pm to theballguy
Is this a 21-0 thing?
It's a 21-0 thing, isn't it?
It's a 21-0 thing, isn't it?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:15 pm to theballguy
Now is vastly superior to the crap before. Every team that has a actual chance to win the natty is included.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:15 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
You have this because they know the G schools will sue them if they’re excluded…..and win
I know of that yes. Would they be successful? I wouldn't say 1 hundo but it's not far off.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:15 pm to Jake88
quote:That's a product of the playoff. Not ditching the BCS formula. I don't know why we can't just do both.
Now is vastly superior to the crap before. Every team that has a actual chance to win the natty is included.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:16 pm to Jake88
quote:
Every team that has a actual chance to win the natty is included.
8-9 teams beyond that even.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News