Started By
Message

re: Down Year For the SEC - Will Next Year be Better?

Posted on 1/20/09 at 11:11 pm to
Posted by tigernchicago
Alabama
Member since Sep 2003
5075 posts
Posted on 1/20/09 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

All ad's will hide under their desks once your probation starts buddy.


Did a bama fan just attempt to suggest another school is headed to probation?

Pot meet Kettle.
Posted by DaphneTigah
Flying under the radar.
Member since Dec 2007
4993 posts
Posted on 1/20/09 at 11:28 pm to



Good Stuff

Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8154 posts
Posted on 1/20/09 at 11:44 pm to
Yeah, because USC's defense was so awesome this year that it could have prolly held Florida's offense to like 20 points. Seriously, please name one team on USC's schedule that has the talent that Florida has on Offense. Please, you wouldn't be able to hold off Tebow of Nazareth or Percy Harvin.

Of course, Florida's defense would have done to Sanchez the same activities that got Sanchez in trouble a little while back.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13240 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 3:39 am to
quote:

I've lost a shitload of respect for you based on reading this thread, guy. Florida will never beat USC? Get The frick Out.

Lighten up, Francis.

My post said "Forida" not Florida.
Posted by Gump
Member since Jan 2009
915 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 4:52 am to
LOL at a USC fan talking trash about Alabama losing to Utah, when Utah was the only undefeated team in the nation and beat the team that spanked the Trojans.

The SEC just won its' 3rd national championship in a row. If that's "down" I'll take it.

This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 5:00 am
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13240 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 5:15 am to
quote:

LOL at a USC fan talking trash about Alabama losing to Utah, when Utah was the only undefeated team in the nation and beat the team that spanked the Trojans. The SEC just won its' 3rd national championship in a row. If that's "down" I'll take it.
You got your asses kicked in the SEC's home bowl game, here in the South.

By a Mountain West Conference team.

You don't want NONE of SC, Bammer. We'd whip you so bad you wouldn't know whose boy you were when we got through with you.
This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 5:18 am
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 5:37 am to
quote:



You don't want NONE of SC, Bammer. We'd whip you so bad you wouldn't know whose boy you were when we got through with you.


I'm glad to see you aren't arrogant.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 5:47 am to
quote:

You got your asses kicked in the SEC's home bowl game, here in the South.

By a Mountain West Conference team.


You got yours kicked by a Pac10 team.
Posted by wolfgang
Baton Rouge and Los Angeles
Member since Jan 2007
1898 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 5:56 am to
no, lower ala tro---auburn would not have beaten USC that year. the result would have been about the same as they were against okla.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13240 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 6:08 am to
quote:

You got yours kicked by a Pac10 team.
You got beat BAD. We lost on the road to a conference opponent that always plays us tough.

We lost by a touchdown. You lost by, well, a little more than that.



Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 6:11 am to
true... but really... a Pac10 team.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 7:12 am to
quote:

no, lower ala tro---auburn would not have beaten USC that year. the result would have been about the same as they were against okla.



And how the hell do you figure that? USC played a few close games against bad teams, almost lost to UCLA and Stanford, who both sucked that year. I don't understand how you can act like they were invincible when they were a lucky bounce or two away from losing to a really horrible team.

You can't say USC would have beaten Auburn like they beat Oklahoma because that statement has no factual basis. They didn't play the game so we don't know who was better, that's why the debate has lasted so long. So yeah, you can't say USC would have blown out Auburn as if it were a sure thing, unless you are retarded.
This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 7:14 am
Posted by JB Bama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Sep 2008
2670 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 8:53 am to
How about the fact that USC gets to play a home bowl game every year?

Hard to call Florida out for staying in state when you finish off your season in your home stadium against a weak opponent.

Wonder what your Rose Bowl record would look like if every other year it was played in the Shoe.

And, for the record it's hard to call Utah a weak opponent when they were the only undefeated team this season and beat 5 teams ranked in the top 25.
The same argument that holds that Florida has no claim to the NC goes against your statement that Utah wasn't a quality opponent.
This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 8:55 am
Posted by Wildcat
Kentucky
Member since Sep 2007
5771 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 8:59 am to
quote:

biggest chokers on the face of the Earth


Stanford
Oregon State

cough***cough***sorry....choking

You southern cal frickers make my nuts itch. frick off.
Posted by PaganMoralist
The Old North
Member since Jun 2008
1480 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 10:28 am to
Maybe Alabama fans should pipe down a bit. The entire CFB world watched the Tide wet the bed in the Sugar Bowl and embarrass the SEC to boot.


Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
13007 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 11:13 am to
quote:

You got your asses kicked in the SEC's home bowl game, here in the South.


USC loses to STANFORD and Oregon St (5'3, 155lb) RB kicked your arse.

San Jose St (dont talk about ULM, La Tech, or citidale again)
Ohio St (overrated like you pointed out)

Washington
Washington St (both combined for 1 win last year)

California
ND ( hahahahaha)
Oregon St (uh oh)
Oregon
Arizona St.
Stanford ( upset alert )
UCLA
Arizona

Now thats a JUGGERNUAT of a schedule.

Im not sayin USC is a horrible program! They are one of the Premire programs, but you play a shite arse schedule in the worst Conference. LSU, FLA, UGA, Bama, Auburn and the rest of the SEC play in the toughest conference and play 4-5 ranked opponents within a 6 week period. When was the last time USC played 4-5 ranked opp with a 5-6 week period????? USC would still be a top 15 program if they were in the SEC....but dont be a homer and believe they wouldnt have anymore losses on their record. No way in hell would they dominate the SEC like they do the Pac 10. USC would just be another tough opp in the SEC, and would have alot more 9-3 seasons under their belt
This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 11:17 am
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26187 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Unless you beat Utah

Ole Miss would have kicked Utah's teeth in.
Posted by Gump
Member since Jan 2009
915 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

You got don't want none of SC bammer.


I'm sorry, I can't take this threat seriously by the fan of a team that has choked their guts out vs. STANFORD (as what, a 30 point favorite?) and Oregon State in consecutive years.
This post was edited on 1/21/09 at 12:51 pm
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
72444 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 1:21 pm to
SEC will be better than the shitty arse Pac 10.
Posted by PaganMoralist
The Old North
Member since Jun 2008
1480 posts
Posted on 1/21/09 at 1:43 pm to
lol at Bama fans



Almost have to feel sorry for them, two out of their last 3 losses have come to mid majors, one at home and the other by double digits.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter