Started By
Message
re: Does UGA need the best defense in the country to win a title again?
Posted on 8/21/22 at 9:19 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 8/21/22 at 9:19 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You are simply repeating flawed nonsense that has already been defeated. This proves you learned nothing in all of our discussions. Not even the idea of pace.
I'm repeating the starting lineups, injuries during the game, etc. which is all that is needed. I'd like to have this with other people instead of the same thing with you but you keep wanting to have the same discussion over and over with me when I don't want to with you.
2
Posted on 8/21/22 at 9:30 pm to mbogo
UGA barely beat Bama in Natty with them decimated by injuries. They will be a top 10 team but will not make the Natty this year.
Posted on 8/21/22 at 10:34 pm to mbogo
quote:
I'm repeating the starting lineups, injuries during the game, etc. which is all that is needed
Correct. The starting lineups tell us who played and who didn’t play, which is all that is needed.
That’s a fact no matter who you want to discuss this with, and you can’t accept it. It’s just as real as 33-18.
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 8/21/22 at 11:21 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Correct. The starting lineups tell us who played and who didn’t play, which is all that is needed.
I agree so let me have a discussion with others and not have to have the same one with you over and over.
Posted on 8/21/22 at 11:23 pm to theRealJesseD
Lol, so you truly do think they were not down relative to the Saban Era last year?
If all reports are true from fall camp, you are in for a big disappointment this season because this team will be infinitely stronger and more experienced than 2021.
If all reports are true from fall camp, you are in for a big disappointment this season because this team will be infinitely stronger and more experienced than 2021.
This post was edited on 8/21/22 at 11:24 pm
Posted on 8/21/22 at 11:52 pm to ETT2001
Was Bama down last year, or were they an incredible force of nature on offense that needed two fluke injuries at the end of the season to derail them? I’m seeing mixed messages.
UGA was the consensus #1 team going into the SECCG with an elite defense and a potent offense. We had our absolutely worst defensive performance against Bama in round 1 and instead of arguing that it was the outlier, it was made the standard that the National Championship game was compared to.
Perhaps the difference in the natty wasn’t just injuries, but that our defensive game plan resembled what we did for the entire rest of the season.
UGA was the consensus #1 team going into the SECCG with an elite defense and a potent offense. We had our absolutely worst defensive performance against Bama in round 1 and instead of arguing that it was the outlier, it was made the standard that the National Championship game was compared to.
Perhaps the difference in the natty wasn’t just injuries, but that our defensive game plan resembled what we did for the entire rest of the season.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 6:24 am to mbogo
quote:
agree so let me have a discussion with others and not have to have the same one with you over and over.
Sorry. Not gonna let you slide like that. Others might not be as effective at dispelling your wacky ideas.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 6:42 am to Goforit
quote:
UGA barely beat Bama in Natty
Posted on 8/22/22 at 7:10 am to Goforit
quote:
UGA barely beat Bama in Natty with them decimated by injuries
Bama got beat by 15 against a decimated uga. Backups all over the place
Posted on 8/22/22 at 9:26 am to mbogo
quote:
Your coach said your team was healthier than it had been in a long time while Bama was missing many starters and was in worse shape than they had been at any time.
We had to swap in a new left tackle and new right guard during the game.
Seriously.
Edit to remind you that our former walk on QB destroyed your defense in the 4th quarter with those backup linemen.
Our walkon safety prevented any TDs except for that short field on the turnover.
I'm sorry you can't beat a bunch of walkons in the game that mattered. Rebuilding years are tough for Bama, amirite?
This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 9:28 am
Posted on 8/22/22 at 10:12 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Was Bama down last year, or were they an incredible force of nature on offense that needed two fluke injuries at the end of the season to derail them? I’m seeing mixed messages.
UGA was the consensus #1 team going into the SECCG with an elite defense and a potent offense. We had our absolutely worst defensive performance against Bama in round 1 and instead of arguing that it was the outlier, it was made the standard that the National Championship game was compared to.
Perhaps the difference in the natty wasn’t just injuries, but that our defensive game plan resembled what we did for the entire rest of the season.
UGA simply had a bad defensive QUARTER against Bama in the SECCG. (24 points in the second quarter of the SECCG).
Posted on 8/22/22 at 10:14 am to DawginSC
quote:
UGA simply had a bad defensive QUARTER against Bama in the SECCG. (24 points in the second quarter of the SECCG).
That’s hilarious.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 10:24 am to bisonduck
quote:
That’s hilarious.
Is it though? Their O scored 34 + 18 in 8 q’s. That is 24 in 1, and 28 in 7, right? Outliers and things.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 10:30 am to bisonduck
quote:
That’s hilarious.
It was an anomaly. Bama didn't reach double digit offensive points in any of the 7 other quarters against UGA last year. Had 9 in the 4th quarter of the NCG (off a UGA turnover that many don't think was a turnover) and 10 in the 4th of the SECCG (7 of which came on an interception returned for a TD.
UGA's defense gave up 0, 24, 7, 3, 3, 6, 0, 9 in their 8 quarters. The 24 clearly stands out as the anomaly... that's 2.5 standard deviations above the mean.
Bama's defense gave up 3, 14, 0, 7, 0, 6, 7, 13 No real anomalies there. mean plus standard deviation is 12... so 13 and 14 are not really outliers.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:28 am to cajunbama
quote:
“We’re not due again till 2060/62”.
bless your heart tigger ...
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:00 pm to DawginSC
quote:
It's odd you think one game somehow makes the defense bad considering your team generally has a couple awful defensive performances each year.
I wasn't referring to one game. I said it was genuinely strange that Kirby's teams have been totally blown out at least once (sometimes twice) every season he's been the head coach at UGA despite having a top defense every year. Bama fans are well aware of our own inconsistencies on defense.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:21 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Is it though? Their O scored 34 + 18 in 8 q’s. That is 24 in 1, and 28 in 7, right? Outliers and things.
There’s no mulligans in football. Don’t be the excuse maker.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:26 pm to bisonduck
quote:
There’s no mulligans in football. Don’t be the excuse maker.
Don’t get so upset at the simple math proving a good point:
24 vs 4 avg is a striking difference.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:39 pm to mbogo
Attn Bama fans and anti-Dawg fans:
Never stop using the “if Bama would of had their 2 receivers” excuse. It’s just icing on the cake to Georgia fans for obvious reasons. It’ll never get old. Stay classy.
Never stop using the “if Bama would of had their 2 receivers” excuse. It’s just icing on the cake to Georgia fans for obvious reasons. It’ll never get old. Stay classy.
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:41 pm to djsdawg
quote:
djsdawg
You're letting our equivalent of Stephen rile you up man.
You're better than that.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News