Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:17 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
Your point is valid but putting teams that are not going to be competitive into the post season to placate University presidents is not making CFB any stronger or better.
The NFL does this every year. Have you seen the Buccaneers, Panthers & Falcons with their schedules? One of the worst divisions in football and one of them has to win the division. Then get their asses handed to them in the playoffs.
For people complaining about the changes in CFB looking more like the NFL, this is what happens
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:20 pm to ReauxlTide222
Reading comprehension? "Seems like"
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:28 pm to Nama1435
Bama fan
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:31 pm to scrybe
It doesn’t seem like any 7-5 teams want in over 11-1 Big 10 teams.
ETA: Or any other conferences for that matter
ETA: Or any other conferences for that matter
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:49 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
It doesn’t seem like any 7-5 teams want in over 11-1 Big 10 teams.
Fans of teams. Not teams.
Did it completely elude you that my OP was never meant to be taken literal? I took a stab at being hyperbolic and obviously missed the mark with you.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:51 pm to Nama1435
More than half of the SEC sucks so does it matter?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:53 pm to 3down10
quote:
The current committee is trash and they have no idea what the frick they are doing. The people they are picking for these things make no sense at all.
Just last week people were celebrating that a guy from Arkansas was gonna make some big difference in the committee. Yeah, how the frick did that turn out?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:56 pm to Nasty_Canasta
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:58 pm to Tdubs7
It's the end of November.
Oregon's best win is?
Indiana's big win is Oregon...but who the heck knows if that's actually a "big" win?
You can't just use SOS as a differentiator between teams with the same records. A 9-3 team with a tough schedule absolutely should get in over a 10-2 team that has no big wins and lost the 1-2 legitimate games they played.
Iowa is a 4 loss team...and they're the "best win" for multiple Big Ten teams...it's a joke.
Oregon's best win is?
Indiana's big win is Oregon...but who the heck knows if that's actually a "big" win?
You can't just use SOS as a differentiator between teams with the same records. A 9-3 team with a tough schedule absolutely should get in over a 10-2 team that has no big wins and lost the 1-2 legitimate games they played.
Iowa is a 4 loss team...and they're the "best win" for multiple Big Ten teams...it's a joke.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:01 pm to Chad4Bama
quote:
Iowa is a 4 loss team...and they're the "best win" for multiple Big Ten teams...it's a joke
The sad part is Iowa didn’t even play OSU or Michigan this year. And they still could lose to Nebraska lol
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:11 pm to Nama1435
Not even worth watching anymore honestly.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:11 pm to Chad4Bama
quote:
A 9-3 team with a tough schedule absolutely should get in over a 10-2 team
But theoretically Oregon can still go 11-1. If they do lose to either Southern Cal or Washington the committee isn’t taking them anyways.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:16 pm to scrybe
quote:most likely
Did it completely elude you
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:56 pm to ScottLA
If you have 1 or no losses you are in even with the weakest SOS ever
But with the weakest sos ever most teams would have no losses…the committee can’t grab a hold of this fact….
But with the weakest sos ever most teams would have no losses…the committee can’t grab a hold of this fact….
Posted on 11/20/25 at 4:17 pm to Nama1435
Guys, you're making too big a deal out of it. Relax, Sankey was assured it was going to matter now, and he believed it so much he signed up to give his conference 8 more losses a year.
Sad part is he probably actually believed it.
Sad part is he probably actually believed it.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News