Started By
Message
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:52 am to plainstodetroit
All you need to know
Undefeated vs. Not...
quit with the Tate shite
Undefeated vs. Not...
quit with the Tate shite
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:55 am to Dignan
Not to mention that 50% of Ingrams yards came after contact.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 8:58 am
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:57 am to sugatowng
quote:
quit with the Tate shite
I think the point in comparing Ingram to Tate is that their stats are very similar.....
quote:
Undefeated vs. Not...
so based on that....as of tonight Ingram will be out of the Heisman race
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:58 am to plainstodetroit
Tate could be in the Heisman discussion if his team were still undefeated.
I didn't realize his numbers were as good as they are, probably because I've only watched him play against LSU.
I didn't realize his numbers were as good as they are, probably because I've only watched him play against LSU.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:01 am to Dignan
quote:
I didn't realize his numbers were as good as they are, probably because I've only watched him play against LSU.
against LSU was the only conference game that Tate did not run for at least 128+ yards...
I think Ingram is a great back....would not surprise me to see him be 1st team All Conference at the end of the year
but Heisman?....not this year
next year
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:25 am to Auburntiger
quote:
I really don't understand why he is in the Heisman discussion this year anyway...
This. Hell he does not even lead his own league in rushing. Ben Tate does. And Tate does not run in a run oriented system behind a dominant O-line.
Therefore Tate is better and is going to win the heisman!!
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:37 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn fans love to ignore the fact that Tate plays on an unranked, 3-loss team. The Heisman typically goes to a player that gets media hype. Given that Auburn is a non-factor this year, so is Tate.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:42 am to bamawriter
Oh, we understand that. We are just pointing out this Ingram heisman talk is silly. He is probably not even the best rb in his own conference. Maybe not even in his own division. Maybe not even in his own state. 
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 9:42 am
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:53 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
I just heards a stat on Gameday that Ingram has 189 yards per game vs. winning teams.
Yowsers...
Yowsers...
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:35 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Ingram does lead the SEC in Rushing... 8 games vs 9 games for Tate...
RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G
1. Mark Ingram-UA SO 8 153 1004 6.6 8 54 125.5
2. Anthony Dixon-MS SR 8 182 1001 5.5 9 57 125.1
3. Ben Tate-AU SR 9 193 1067 5.5 6 60 118.6
4. M. Hardesty-UT SR 8 166 841 5.1 8 43 105.1
5. Derrick Locke-UK JR 8 125 597 4.8 4 31 74.6
6. T. Tebow-UF SR 8 139 551 4.0 8 30 68.9
7. Warren Norman-VU FR 9 104 593 5.7 3 58 65.9
8. J. Demps-UF SO 8 63 488 7.7 5 41 61.0
9. Michael Smith-AR SR 6 56 360 6.4 2 33 60.0
10. D. McCluster-UM SR 8 82 473 5.8 2 79 59.1
RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G
1. Mark Ingram-UA SO 8 153 1004 6.6 8 54 125.5
2. Anthony Dixon-MS SR 8 182 1001 5.5 9 57 125.1
3. Ben Tate-AU SR 9 193 1067 5.5 6 60 118.6
4. M. Hardesty-UT SR 8 166 841 5.1 8 43 105.1
5. Derrick Locke-UK JR 8 125 597 4.8 4 31 74.6
6. T. Tebow-UF SR 8 139 551 4.0 8 30 68.9
7. Warren Norman-VU FR 9 104 593 5.7 3 58 65.9
8. J. Demps-UF SO 8 63 488 7.7 5 41 61.0
9. Michael Smith-AR SR 6 56 360 6.4 2 33 60.0
10. D. McCluster-UM SR 8 82 473 5.8 2 79 59.1
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:40 am to Dignan
I have not really said much about it, but seriously, Bama's schedule has been VERY soft this year. They have not played a team in the current top 20 all year and their best win was a tight game at a neutral sight against an ACC team that is barely ranked.
Not saying Bama is not very good and maybe the best team in the country. But if Ingram is really good, he needs to show it against the first good team Bama has played this year today.
Not saying Bama is not very good and maybe the best team in the country. But if Ingram is really good, he needs to show it against the first good team Bama has played this year today.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:41 am to spacewrangler
Who deserves to be in it if he isn't? Sorry Case Keenum but being at Alabama and not being at Houston matters.
I admit that he probably wouldn't have a legit shot at all in a normal year but this hasn't been a normal year, Bradford out, Tebow meh, McCoy better but not great.
This should really be the year that they give it to a defensive player, I know they gave it to Woodson but if he just played defense he would never have won.
I admit that he probably wouldn't have a legit shot at all in a normal year but this hasn't been a normal year, Bradford out, Tebow meh, McCoy better but not great.
This should really be the year that they give it to a defensive player, I know they gave it to Woodson but if he just played defense he would never have won.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 10:42 am
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:48 am to Crede15
My vote is with Tebow. If you could have any player to build your team around, I'll take Tebow.
I would just as soon have Tate or Dixon as Ingram. In fact, you put Dixon on Bama's team and he would probably be better than Ingram.
I would just as soon have Tate or Dixon as Ingram. In fact, you put Dixon on Bama's team and he would probably be better than Ingram.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 10:49 am
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:02 am to jhamil25
Tebow just doesn't deserve it this year.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:33 am to dex
Ingram doesn't have heisman stats. He's one of the best for sure.. but he's not putting up heisman numbers.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 12:09 pm to Dignan
If you asked Mark, he'd tell you he'd rather have 70 yards and a win, than 150 and a loss. Dude has character.

Posted on 11/7/09 at 12:15 pm to BamaInHsv
quote:
If you asked Mark, he'd tell you he'd rather have 70 yards and a win, than 150 and a loss. Dude has character.
He seems like a genuinely nice guy,
Posted on 11/7/09 at 12:19 pm to bmy
Yep... good kid. He'll go far. You'll be watching him on Sundays in a couple years.
Popular
Back to top


2


