Started By
Message
re: David Pollack wants "rules" to change AU's O
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:09 am to antibarner
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:09 am to antibarner
quote:
antibarner: one of the OL 63 I believe was across the 36 and running downfield.
quote:
No originally ineligible receiver shall be or have been more than 3 yards beyond the neutral zone until a legal forward pass that crosses the neutral zone has been thrown.
if the blue line puts the line of scrimmage at the 39ish then 36ish is 3 yards and therefore.... legal. if it's the Auburn britches right above the ALA on the CBS. screenshot then totally < 3 yards.
This post was edited on 12/9/13 at 11:12 am
1
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:11 am to antibarner
quote:
But the play as it was run is illegal.
refs mess up all the time.
Patrick Peterson Intercepts the ball on your forty yardline with his foot in.....they called him out of bounds.
Eric Reid intercepts the ball and Bama fans say it was incomplete.
It happens.
AU to the championship. They've gotten screwed too.
They won and that is all anyone will remember two years from now. Oh, and that amazing play.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:11 am to N97883
39 and a half...36 and a half would be three yards you can see Prosch's feet well past that,one foot near the 34. O lineman is very near the 36 and running downfield.
And thank you for the pic.
And thank you for the pic.
This post was edited on 12/9/13 at 11:22 am
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:30 am to antibarner
Meltdown of epic proportions.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:31 am to antibarner
quote:
@antibamaer yesterday: Jay Prosch was an ELIGIBLE receiver
quote:
39 and a half...36 and a half would be three yards you can see Prosch's feet well past that,one foot near the 34.
so what if he was five yards down the field getting hit by your LB as he tried to get open?
quote:
lineman is very near the 36 and running downfield.
Extremely legal.
This post was edited on 12/9/13 at 11:35 am
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:36 am to TTsTowel
quote:
Meltdown of epic proportions.
Still melting.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:38 am to N97883
If that lineman was past the 36 and a half he was illegal.
Prosch is blocking downfield, and is illegal. He started blocking Mosley early on turned and maintained the block.
Offensive Pass Interference.
Prosch is blocking downfield, and is illegal. He started blocking Mosley early on turned and maintained the block.
Offensive Pass Interference.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:41 am to antibarner
quote:
Prosch is blocking downfield, and is illegal. He started blocking Mosley early on turned and maintained the block.
Offensive Pass Interference.
I think you should worry about your own team doing this first, since they do it quite often. it looks less melty.
BTW, how much did you lose on your BCS championship tickets? Did the ink run when they were covered in your tears?
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:41 am to See5
antibarner continues to troll..... 
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:41 am to arrakis
Holy shite, he's still going on about that play?
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:50 am to PuntBamaPunt
I did not start the string. David Pollack basically did.
The New York Times. Rick Neuheisel. And others agree with me.
The New York Times. Rick Neuheisel. And others agree with me.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 11:53 am to antibarner
quote:
The New York Times
I love that you believe this one as well
And pollack said it was wrong because it fooled the LB's. guess he needs better coaching
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:00 pm to NYCAuburn
Phil Savage called it a flag football play, clearly illegal and said so on air when it happened and in a later interview.
Smart to run that play. I blame the officials.
Smart to run that play. I blame the officials.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:03 pm to arrakis
quote:
antibarner continues to troll
Yea it's obvious he's trolling now. Which is a great way to cover how poorly he intially handled his team losing a football game.
If they're laughing at you, laugh at yourself strategy.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:04 pm to antibarner
quote:
Phil Savage
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:19 pm to antibarner
quote:
If that lineman was past the 36 and a half he was illegal.
Prosch is blocking downfield, and is illegal. He started blocking Mosley early on turned and maintained the block.
Offensive Pass Interference.
Nope. none of the above. 36.5 and the ball was already released. Legal. Awesome. I didn't appreciate the depth of knowledge Auburn players had about staying within the rules until you came along. I mean I was already proud of them with the whole "greatest moment in sports history" play against Alabama no less but now I am even more proud.
I might hit play again on the DVR and watch it again.
BTW go review the definitions already posted.
This post was edited on 12/9/13 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:35 pm to N97883
Prosch is not legal.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:38 pm to antibarner
quote:
Prosch is not legal.
Give me a second. I need to rethink this thing.
Posted on 12/9/13 at 12:48 pm to MrAUTigers
Given your choice of team I would expect it will take you a lot longer. 
Posted on 12/9/13 at 1:07 pm to antibarner
quote:
Prosch is not legal.
A player is not legal? Legal for what?
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News