Started By
Message
re: Danny Sheridan responds to the NCAA statement
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:42 pm to CFBFAN1121
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:42 pm to CFBFAN1121
What possible Reason can Danny give for not telling the NCAA the name they should already know if he was telling the truth
Second, so he agreed to be quiet, but goes on ESPN, but now says he will continue to talk about it?
Second, so he agreed to be quiet, but goes on ESPN, but now says he will continue to talk about it?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:42 pm to AU03ALUM
UT is 7-0 over Au right now on FSS in the 97 SECCG.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:42 pm to CFBFAN1121
This shite is funny. Dude adamantly says the NCAA knows who the bagman is, and the NCAA acts like they don't know wtf he's talking about. 

Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:48 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
CFBFAN1121
I don't think you realize that you didn't prove your point.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:50 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
you've been defending and blindly believing this dude since day one
I said alot of if this, and I did say he was a reputable analyst. Before this, he was, and it's still not been shown he doesn't know anything. I probably said a couple of things in those statements that look like defense, but you also left out the context of some of them, such as your and most other Aubie defenses in claiming there was no investigation either. Just like yesterday's NCAA comments saying something other than was actually said. They still did not deny what Sheridan said as not being true. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. He and possibly, 'the source' are the only ones that know at this point, along with the NCAA. Perhaps you can shed light on where the NCAA has denied that his statements are false. At least he was willing to come out and call the NCAA deceitful and pretty much liars about their statement. They didn't even come close to that in trying to address his claims. As I said yesterday, they'd been better off with no comment from the get go, as DS would have been from the get go.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:52 pm to Alahunter
quote:
it's still not been shown he knows anything.
FIFY
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:52 pm to Alahunter
START HIJACK-
I asked you another question in the FFL thread.
-END HIJACK.
I asked you another question in the FFL thread.

-END HIJACK.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:52 pm to mgmbamafan
Damn you iPhone!!!
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:52 pm to mgmbamafan
quote:
What possible Reason can Danny give for not telling the NCAA the name they should already know if he was telling the truth Second, so he agreed to be quiet, but goes on ESPN, but now says he will continue to talk about it?
He doesn't need to give them the name. They already know the name. NCAA gonna frick y'all up. Dat's da troof.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:53 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
CFBFAN1121
WHat the hell does your bookmark's list look like?
Just one massive flame/bumping list?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:54 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
WHat the hell does your bookmark's list look like?


Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:56 pm to BamaChick
quote:
BamaChick
Hey.
I miss you.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:56 pm to AU03ALUM
quote:
I seriously doubt they are going to reply to Danny about his "comeback". Why would they? The first statement was just an official statement about the actual meeting. Why would they reply to him about trying to start an internet bickering fight?
Why would they break their own policy and comment on an active investigation?
Look, I dont give a shite about Danny Sheridan, and while I find the auburn obsession with what he says kinda funny, i dont think its meaningful at all. IT wont affect the investigation or their vindication or punishment (whichever the case may be) in the least.
What I do find disturbing is how much of a fool Mark emmert has been made to look like over the past year.
1) The Cam situation was handled extremely poorly. Whether you agree with am being reinstated so quickly or not, the fact that the rest of the country feels the situation was so fishy tells me he did not do a good job making his case to the rest of the country (this has nothing to do with auburn- it is a criticism of emmert and his inability to properly work the press).
2) The Ohio State players are allowed to play in the sugar bowl. 3 months later emmert again looks like a rooked fool for allowing this, as the vest is found to hae lied through his teeth to keep his players eligible.
3) While one of the more extensive cheating scandals of the last 2 decades unfolds in miami, Emmert takes time to engage in a war of words with a USA today odds maker. This is both unseemly for a man in his position as well as foolish. Right now he should be at least acting like he is working on one of no fewer than 4 major investigations (Auburn Oregon Miami and NC).
4) The only BSNCG that has been played on his watch are by teams currently under investigation. Why is he bickering with a writer/oddsmaker rather than assuring the rest of the country he is working to resolve these issues? This again goes to his inability to properly utilize the press to assure people he is trying to run a clean ncaa.
I mean, am I the only one who finds it unseemly for this guy to argue through the press with an odds guy?
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:57 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Perhaps you can shed light on where the NCAA has denied that his statements are false.
Perhaps you can shed light on where the NCAA has denied that Nick Saban is Gay? Gezzzzzz give it up ,its time for football !!
Posted on 8/27/11 at 6:58 pm to ant111
quote:
Perhaps you can shed light on where the NCAA has denied that Nick Saban is Gay? Gezzzzzz give it up ,its time for football !!
What is gezz?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:01 pm to crimson crazy
quote:
What is gezz?
10. gezz
unlike the rest of the definitions, gezz is not pronounced "jeez", instead a G sound unlike the usual J, which is a pimp arse individual who likes fine brunettes and car bombs all the time. Also can be used if someone has a G starting the second syllable in their last name.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:05 pm to Alahunter
quote:
I said alot of if this, and I did say he was a reputable analyst. Before this, he was, and it's still not been shown he doesn't know anything. I probably said a couple of things in those statements that look like defense, but you also left out the context of some of them, such as your and most other Aubie defenses in claiming there was no investigation either. Just like yesterday's NCAA comments saying something other than was actually said. They still did not deny what Sheridan said as not being true. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. He and possibly, 'the source' are the only ones that know at this point, along with the NCAA. Perhaps you can shed light on where the NCAA has denied that his statements are false. At least he was willing to come out and call the NCAA deceitful and pretty much liars about their statement. They didn't even come close to that in trying to address his claims. As I said yesterday, they'd been better off with no comment from the get go, as DS would have been from the get go.
Again, defending DS at all costs. It doesn't matter what the NCAA said. you would've found an angle to defend DS.
Had they said DS didn't have sources within the NCAA, you would've responded "How do they know if DS has sources within the NCAA?"
Had they said "nobody within the NCAA gave DS a name" you would've responded "how do they know?"
No matter what, you would've defended your boy like you have since day 1.
You're an ATPBer posting on the wrong board dude
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:05 pm to crimson crazy
Aw, thanks!
Been real busy with work and football season - my boy is playing for the school this year and they keep us hopping.

Been real busy with work and football season - my boy is playing for the school this year and they keep us hopping.
Back to top
