Started By
Message
re: Dan Mullen: "It's not that we're cocky, we're just better..."
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:36 pm to engie
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:36 pm to engie
quote:
The only way this is even applicable to the matter at hand is who those students donate their money back to and choose to support. I've never seen an MSU fan that went to grad school at OM and became an OM fan.
The education they received was from Ole Miss and that means we are responsible for them making their salary. Them not being a fan of Ole Miss in sports is irrelevant. It's about academics.
quote:
In the end -- how our alumni networks are doing financially can be seen in each school's bottom line -- and for the past decade or so, MSU has been kicking arse and taking names financially while OM has faltered somewhat compared to their historic values.
Gonna need to see these numbers
1
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:36 pm to engie
I have another stat... It separates the Dawgs from everyone else in the conference.
515–549–39 (.485)
515–549–39 (.485)
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:38 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
Yes because it counters your point of saying an abundance of supply will drive the pay down.
When did there become an abundance of supply of fortune 500 CEO's?
quote:
There is an abundance of male CEOs compared to female CEOs, but females still make significantly less.
And in what way is having females "necessary" in the CEO world -- compared to the cheerleading world, where it is absolutely necessary to have a number of males to compete at a high level.
You are simply making an apples to oranges comparison.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:45 pm to engie
quote:
And in what way is having females "necessary" in the CEO world -- compared to the cheerleading world, where it is absolutely necessary to have a number of males to compete at a high level.
It is absolutely not necessary for there to be male cheerleaders, but it is necessary to have females (take a look at the Aggies to confirm that).
Your statement that it is not necessary for there to be female CEOs is pretty ignorant because it is not "necessary" for there to be male CEOs for a business to succeed either. And again, it is percentages, not numbers. It is ridiculous that only 2% of females make up Fortune 500 CEOs AND that their pay is significantly less.
I'll agree that cheerleaders and CEOs are not equal, but that was not the point of the matter. I see the disparity on a regular basis in the business world.
This post was edited on 5/9/13 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:21 pm to UMTigerRebel
Wait are y'all still arguing who makes more money on average?
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:27 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Gonna need to see these numbers
Posted them here many times before. Do you really need to see them again? Because the level of butt hurt that flows with those numbers is excessive...
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:28 pm to reggierayreb
quote:
I have another stat... It separates the Dawgs from everyone else in the conference.
515–549–39 (.485)
Wrong.
Do I need to tear this one apart as well? Done that before too...
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:36 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
It is absolutely not necessary for there to be male cheerleaders, but it is necessary to have females (take a look at the Aggies to confirm that).
Why is there male cheerleaders on every advanced collegiate competition cheerleading squad? Because their strength is needed in advanced routines -- and that strength can not be mimicked by females. Hence why those males are in higher demand than the female counterparts -- in the same way that a girl with a gymnastics and advanced tumbling background is in higher demand than one that doesn't have those things...
quote:
Your statement that it is not necessary for there to be female CEOs is pretty ignorant because it is not "necessary" for there to be male CEOs for a business to succeed either.
You are -- again -- trying to turn what I said into a straw man argument about something completely different.
quote:
I'll agree that cheerleaders and CEOs are not equal, but that was not the point of the matter. I see the disparity on a regular basis in the business world.
So, you concede that this is straw man?
And I don't see any disparity in either of my professional fields -- either current or former.
If this happened in the manner in which it is alleged, and was as prevalent as alleged, it would be front page news every day of our lives.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:38 pm to engie
Please do
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:41 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
It's still MS though, is that really something to brag about?
shite, we need to soften up our schedule. When do we get Florida again? They are our bitch. Just ask Tim Tebow.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:42 pm to engie
quote:
I have another stat... It separates the Dawgs from everyone else in the conference.
515–549–39 (.485)
Wrong.
Do I need to tear this one apart as well? Done that before too...
What, is this not your overall football record?
I have another stat... It separates the Dawgs from everyone else in the conference.
515–549–39 (.485)
Wrong.
Do I need to tear this one apart as well? Done that before too...
What, is this not your overall football record?
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:45 pm to HuggieBear
They had some undeserved probations due to false wrongdoings reported by Ole Miss boosters over the years. It's a shame really.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:49 pm to reggierayreb
State sucks
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:52 pm to HuggieBear
quote:
What, is this not your overall football record?
What is Penn State's overall football record?
No -- that's not really our overall football record...
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:54 pm to engie
quote:
Why is there male cheerleaders on every advanced collegiate competition cheerleading squad? Because their strength is needed in advanced routines -- and that strength can not be mimicked by females. Hence why those males are in higher demand than the female counterparts -- in the same way that a girl with a gymnastics and advanced tumbling background is in higher demand than one that doesn't have those things...
At the collegiate level there is also such a thing as an all girl division, but not one for an all male division. Also, at high school camps, unless there were co-ed squads, the males were utilized, but not necessary. In high school the vast majority of squads are all female. At the college level, they are mostly coed, so I will give it to you that they are necessary to teach the camps.
As for the rest, I gave 2 completely different scenarios where women make less than men for a job with similar responsibilities. I was never trying to say they were equal jobs, so I'm sorry you took it that way.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:55 pm to engie
quote:
No -- that's not really our overall football record...
Ok. Then what is it? It's still a losing record regardless.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:56 pm to Henry Jones Jr
According to one State site it's this.
BUUUUUUULL shite
quote:
All Time Record 531-531-40
BUUUUUUULL shite
This post was edited on 5/9/13 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:57 pm to engie
You've said that twice...what is your football recrod.....
Posted on 5/9/13 at 7:02 pm to Shunface
quote:
Please do
Just for you, then, it is. I even removed the trend projections for you -- in attempt to avoid the ridiculous flame fest that follows...
Page 14 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News