Started By
Message
re: Current Blue Bloods in the SEC
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:32 pm to magildachunks
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:32 pm to magildachunks
Looks like someone cares.
0
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:45 pm to magildachunks
The fact that you think UGA is fighting for relevance and attention after the past 3 seasons shows how out of touch with reality you are. Its certainly not UGA fans who consistently rank us #1, and that really makes LSU fan jealous.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 9:51 pm to JoeKinesKhakis
Great Pic for your post....well done!
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:01 pm to GoGators1995
Do you hate LSU that much that you have come to the defense of UGA as a Florida fan?
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 7/11/24 at 10:14 pm to lsudave1
All I did was make a factual correction. 
This post was edited on 7/11/24 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:18 pm to jcolding41
quote:
Georgia The Wally Butts, Vince Dooley and Mark Richt eras probably were enough to get the Bulldogs on the list, but Kirby Smart’s dominant tenure eliminates any room for debate. Georgia is the current most feared program in college football, and Smart doesn’t seem willing to relinquish that title.
Success under Kirby Smart doesn’t make you a blue blood all of sudden. If UGA is a “Blue Blood” then Tennessee certainly is.
Tennessee rankings
All time win %- .672 (2nd in SEC) 11th all time
National Titles- 6 (2nd in SEC) 9th all time
All time wins- 876 (3rd SEC) was 2nd in SEC till Pruitt had to vacate all his sins. 10th all time
Conference titles- 16 (2nd in SEC)
Bowl Games- 56 (5th all time NCAA)
Wide Receiver Drafted- 44 (1st in SEC, 4th all time)
College football HOF- 26 (1st in SEC, 5th all time)
6th largest stadium in all of Football
#10 in AP All Time Top 25 from 1936-2023
11th in NCAA in wins since 1980. (UGA #10)
Some you may not agree, but if you gonna count the recent success of UGA as a metric for Blue Blood status, then you can’t discredit the history of Tennessee that most definitely qualifies them for Blue Bloof status.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:21 pm to BigDickRick16
quote:
Wide Receiver Drafted- 44 (1st in SEC, 4th all time)
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:33 pm to Old1937
quote:
You guys have trouble with the Aggies , they ran from the B12 to get to play you every year.
A&M only won 3 games against LSU since joining the SEC. I wouldn't call that having trouble.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:37 pm to n64ra
Absolutely not..since the 1930s latest or u ain't blue
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:43 pm to BigDickRick16
quote:
Success under Kirby Smart doesn’t make you a blue blood all of sudden. If UGA is a “Blue Blood” then Tennessee certainly is.
Neither are historical blue bloods, and I am starting to wonder how the hell Texas is one.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:46 pm to Jebadeb
I'd start with 1981 there sport...
quote:
but we remember 1980-2020.
Posted on 7/11/24 at 11:51 pm to djsdawg
Yes..Texas is one by deception..they popped for a quickie here and there..much like lsu
Posted on 7/12/24 at 12:44 am to jcolding41
Current and blue blood 
Posted on 7/12/24 at 1:26 am to jcolding41
lol UGA is not a blue blood. LSU has more of a case than UGA. Even Florida does. More championships in the last 30 years and longer between the first and the last. UGA went 40 years between championships.
Just stfu, sit in the corner and ask yourself how a defending national champion “blue blood” lost to the luckiest mediocre team that barely beat Auburn right after they got blown out by NM State.
Real “blue blood” energy there. Dumbass.
Just stfu, sit in the corner and ask yourself how a defending national champion “blue blood” lost to the luckiest mediocre team that barely beat Auburn right after they got blown out by NM State.
Real “blue blood” energy there. Dumbass.
Posted on 7/12/24 at 1:28 am to TN Tygah
quote:
LSU has more of a case than UGA. Even Florida does.
Your SEC titles laugh at you for making such a stupid suggestion.
Posted on 7/12/24 at 2:10 am to TN Tygah
Let's take it one by one here.
- Longer between first and last is a stupid criteria. But you went 45 years between your first and second.
- Florida had never won a real SEC championship until 1990. If you're gonna say you don't accept recent success, kind of foolish.
-The latest accomplishments shouldn't count more, but they certainly should count at least the same.
With Georgia's latest push they are pretty much even with LSU and better than UF.
You can check all of that here
UGA vs. LSU
and here
UGA vs. UF
- Longer between first and last is a stupid criteria. But you went 45 years between your first and second.
- Florida had never won a real SEC championship until 1990. If you're gonna say you don't accept recent success, kind of foolish.
-The latest accomplishments shouldn't count more, but they certainly should count at least the same.
With Georgia's latest push they are pretty much even with LSU and better than UF.
You can check all of that here
UGA vs. LSU
and here
UGA vs. UF
Posted on 7/12/24 at 2:45 am to jcolding41
quote:
The Wally Butts, Vince Dooley and Mark Richt eras probably were enough to get the Bulldogs on the list,
Mark Richt?
Now that shite is funny right there.
Posted on 7/12/24 at 2:54 am to koreandawg
quote:
With Georgia's latest push they are pretty much even with LSU and better than UF.
That is fair.
Kirby has UGA at an elite level. But their history is not on par with the other three listed.
In 5 or 10 years, I may have a different opinion if Kirby sustains the elite level. No reason to believe he won't. The other three schools certainly have done so in their past.
Posted on 7/12/24 at 3:11 am to BrerTiger
quote:
Kirby has UGA at an elite level. But their history is not on par with the other three listed.
Surely you aren’t talking about lsu and uf
Posted on 7/12/24 at 3:15 am to djsdawg
quote:
Surely you aren’t talking about lsu and uf
Dipshit, the OP listed Bama, OU and Texas. Those are blue bloods or the phrase has no meaning.
So no, I wasn't including LSU or Florida. Big Six <> Blue Blood
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News