Started By
Message
re: Cowherd takes shots at Alabama scheduling and the SEC
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:57 pm to BamaNixon
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:57 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Seems pretty even to me.
Allow me to reiterate...
quote:
I really don't care one way or another about Alabama's schedule - as long as it includes LSU every year. And yes, even if Alabama continues to schedule a bye before their big game with the Tigers.
0
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:57 pm to cyde
I know, but everyone likes a compliment
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:57 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Way to rat us out, rat.
Snitches get stitches.
I RA'd you for being a buttface.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:02 pm to cyde
Also, I'm downvoting every post you've made in this thread out of PURE SPITE. Enjoy your THREE downvotes!
Check AND mate.
Check AND mate.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Leave us alone! We aren't hurting anyone!
Reading your posts in this thread has hurt me.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:07 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Also, I'm downvoting every post you've made in this thread out of PURE SPITE. Enjoy your THREE downvotes!
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:15 pm to Mattwells90
I have no intentions of taking this Cowherd rant seriously if he doesn't even know that it is Tennessee-Chattanooga, not Chattanooga State. I don't want to hear you spitting bullcrap if you can't even get schools names right.
I think ND plays better opponents top-to-bottom, but non of their opponents are as good as Alabama's toughest opponents.
I think ND plays better opponents top-to-bottom, but non of their opponents are as good as Alabama's toughest opponents.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:16 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Coach Saban is concerned about the well-being of student athletes and how they are put into danger with the substitution rules around the HUNH. As smart as Coach Saban is, he obviously knew that some benighted individuals (no offense, but you are so very benighted) would try to present his bravery in an unfavorable light, but he spoke the truth anyway.
If he's concerned about safety maybe he should have his LBs, safeties, or CBs let the opposing QB know before the play starts which player(s) are blitzing. In the name of QB safety.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:35 pm to meldawg399
quote:
If he's concerned about safety maybe he should have his LBs, safeties, or CBs let the opposing QB know before the play starts which player(s) are blitzing. In the name of QB safety.
Good point.
Stand up for player safety, Saban.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:37 pm to meldawg399
quote:
If he's concerned about safety maybe he should have his LBs, safeties, or CBs let the opposing QB know before the play starts which player(s) are blitzing. In the name of QB safety.
That's crazy talk. You're talking crazy.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 5:29 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
That's crazy talk. You're talking crazy.
Well both the HUNH & blitzing player's not declaring themselves blitzers are both within the rulebook; both pose threats to player safety. I'd argue the HUNH is less dangerous than unknown blitzers hitting the QB from his blind side.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 5:36 pm to meldawg399
Saban gives his sincerest apology for not thinking the same as you do.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 5:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
How many times does this have to be explained? The rotations were kept to a large degree and it was even said that they tried to stick to it as much as possible. With one glowing exception: LSU was to rotate on Kentucky and Bama was to rotate on Georgia. This was swapped at the last second.
Where are you getting that LSU was to rotate onto LSU's schedule and was changed at the last second? LSU and UK played in 2011. The return game of the series was dropped in '12 just like all the rotating cross-division return games were dropped in '12 due to expansion.
You've repeatedly asked for a reasonable explanation for the bridge schedule and you've been answered several times yet you've failed to acknowledge the answer:
As you said, the schedulers tried to follow the normal cross-division rotation as much as possible. That's why LSU got USC in '12, LSU got UGA in '13, and Bama got UK in '13. It would appear that all this outrage is due to the fact that Bama played Mizzou instead of UGA in '12. It should be obvious that when you add 2 teams to the schedule, they are each going to need cross-division opponents. A&M hosted UF, and UM hosted Bama. As others have stated, both new members got premiere cross-division home games in their 1st season. While I don't think those selections were random, there is a reasonable explanation that does not involve unfounded conspiracies to rig the schedule in favor of a particular team; namely, the league wanted the new members to host premiere cross-division opponents in year 1.
Is this not reasonable?
This post was edited on 5/14/13 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 5/14/13 at 6:25 pm to sarc
Put this thread and the "Is Alabama a Dynasty" thread together and you have 38 pages of bitching, crying, pissing and moaning about BAMA.
We in some of these MOFO's heads son DAMN.
We in some of these MOFO's heads son DAMN.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 6:32 pm to Mattwells90
Answer is simple....move SEC office out of the bammers' backyard
Posted on 5/14/13 at 6:39 pm to windsor1977
quote:
Answer is simple....move SEC office out of the bammers' backyard
Cause LSU said so dammit....
windsor1977, I'm not sure who you pull for though.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 6:56 pm to BIG DADDY 73
26 pages, not bad
Posted on 5/14/13 at 7:23 pm to Mattwells90
slive runs the show and sabin gets the benefits!
Posted on 5/14/13 at 7:23 pm to Mattwells90
slive runs the show and sabin gets the benefits!
Posted on 5/14/13 at 7:25 pm to timm6971463
Thank god you double posted. We needed 27 pages on this
Page 26 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News