Started By
Message
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:24 pm to SlicedBread
Cincinnati at 103. What a pathetic conference they're in
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:28 pm to SlicedBread
quote:
2. Vanderbilt: 105-55, (65.6%)
Print the moral victory shirts!
Ger Ders!
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:31 pm to SlicedBread
Kind of a simple way to calculate SOS. If you play a team that went 8-4 in the SEC, it gives you the same SOS if you play a team from the Sun Belt that went 8-4.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:45 pm to SlicedBread
quote:
5. Mississippi State: 98-58, (62.8%)
Will be remembered as the best team in the history of college football?
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:49 pm to SlicedBread
SECW teams ranked too low.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:50 pm to csgau
quote:
Thuga
Try having an original thought
Posted on 8/3/22 at 5:04 pm to SlicedBread
quote:
93. Notre Dame: 73-76, (49.0%)
Posted on 8/3/22 at 5:58 pm to SlicedBread
Ole Miss at #60 is laughable, that schedule thru 9 games is soft as fk. I doubt an Ole Miss fan disagrees,
Posted on 8/3/22 at 6:15 pm to SlicedBread
Arkansas the only team that every team they play this year made the postseason last year.
Yay us.
Yay us.
Posted on 8/3/22 at 6:16 pm to SlicedBread
The problem with these types of metrics is they use averages. And averages suck.
I've posted it 100 times already, and I'll probably post it another 100 times this year.
Which is the more difficult schedule?
vs #1 and vs #100
or
vs #49 and #50
The correct answer is the schedule that is vs the #1 and #100 team is WAY more difficult than playing the #49 and #50 teams. Most top25 teams could expect 1 loss on one schedule while expecting 0 losses against the #49 and #50 teams.
But averages say the opposite is true. Averages say the team that played the #49 and #50 teams had the more difficult schedule.
The best way to overcome this problem is to predict the number of expected losses an elite team would expect to have on any particular schedule. Such a metric would correctly show that the #1 and #100 schedule is tougher with 1 expected loss, while the #49 and #50 schedule would have 0 expected losses.
I've posted it 100 times already, and I'll probably post it another 100 times this year.
Which is the more difficult schedule?
vs #1 and vs #100
or
vs #49 and #50
The correct answer is the schedule that is vs the #1 and #100 team is WAY more difficult than playing the #49 and #50 teams. Most top25 teams could expect 1 loss on one schedule while expecting 0 losses against the #49 and #50 teams.
But averages say the opposite is true. Averages say the team that played the #49 and #50 teams had the more difficult schedule.
The best way to overcome this problem is to predict the number of expected losses an elite team would expect to have on any particular schedule. Such a metric would correctly show that the #1 and #100 schedule is tougher with 1 expected loss, while the #49 and #50 schedule would have 0 expected losses.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News