Started By
Message

re: College football strength of schedule rankings for 2022 season

Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:19 pm to
Posted by JetDawg
Los Angeles, California
Member since Oct 2020
7147 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:19 pm to
After the last couple of seasons or so, UGA needed a break. We'll take it.

Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65617 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:24 pm to

Cincinnati at 103. What a pathetic conference they're in
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

2. Vanderbilt: 105-55, (65.6%)


Print the moral victory shirts!

Ger Ders!
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
2727 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:31 pm to
Kind of a simple way to calculate SOS. If you play a team that went 8-4 in the SEC, it gives you the same SOS if you play a team from the Sun Belt that went 8-4.
Posted by TimeOutdoors
AK
Member since Sep 2014
12120 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

5. Mississippi State: 98-58, (62.8%)


Will be remembered as the best team in the history of college football?
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24724 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:49 pm to
SECW teams ranked too low.
Posted by Knowshon5Dolla
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2021
1374 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Thuga


Try having an original thought
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30070 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

93. Notre Dame: 73-76, (49.0%)
Posted by MullenBoys
In the minds of Ole Miss fans
Member since Apr 2014
13673 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 5:58 pm to
Ole Miss at #60 is laughable, that schedule thru 9 games is soft as fk. I doubt an Ole Miss fan disagrees,
Posted by DuckTalesLOL
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2018
6056 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 6:15 pm to
Arkansas the only team that every team they play this year made the postseason last year.

Yay us.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22565 posts
Posted on 8/3/22 at 6:16 pm to
The problem with these types of metrics is they use averages. And averages suck.

I've posted it 100 times already, and I'll probably post it another 100 times this year.

Which is the more difficult schedule?

vs #1 and vs #100

or

vs #49 and #50


The correct answer is the schedule that is vs the #1 and #100 team is WAY more difficult than playing the #49 and #50 teams. Most top25 teams could expect 1 loss on one schedule while expecting 0 losses against the #49 and #50 teams.

But averages say the opposite is true. Averages say the team that played the #49 and #50 teams had the more difficult schedule.

The best way to overcome this problem is to predict the number of expected losses an elite team would expect to have on any particular schedule. Such a metric would correctly show that the #1 and #100 schedule is tougher with 1 expected loss, while the #49 and #50 schedule would have 0 expected losses.

Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter