Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:11 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Do think I'll tinker with Sagarin next week.
I’ll grab the Sagarin for you if you tell me what you want.. I can post it here in a format (hopefully) that you can just copy and paste into excel.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:12 am to SummerOfGeorge
Is there a good place with accurate data sets? I’ve always stayed away from it because you’d really need all numbers for all teams to really have the best data. Way too much work.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:14 am to momentoftruth87
Thanks Big Bro - I'll post something this weekend.
Moment - yea, collegefootballdata.com
It's got everything. Really cool.
Moment - yea, collegefootballdata.com
It's got everything. Really cool.
This post was edited on 9/22/21 at 9:15 am
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:17 am to SummerOfGeorge
Thanks boss. I’ll look at it later. 
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:26 am to momentoftruth87
The jury is not still out on Corral. He led the nation total offense last year. And he’s been better this year.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:31 am to VivaZapata27
quote:
The jury is not still out on Corral. He led the nation total offense last year. And he’s been better this year.
Ok.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:35 am to SummerOfGeorge
Miami one spot ahead of UAB... Humm think that is probably about right.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:39 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Raw = (((SP+FPI)/2)*40%) + ((SOR+GC/2)*55%)) + (Avg Win Prob *5%)
So, in theory
- 55% "strength of your resume/profile"
- 40% "how good you are"
- 5% "how dominant have you been regardless of opponent"
It's obviously a sliding scale of how important you think each area is - I only barely used average win probability because it's not attached to any sort of opponent adjustment, so Boston College is #5 on Avg WP but only #46 on Strength of Record because they hammered Colgate and Temple and were up from the start against UMass. I mean that's good, it's better than the alternative, but SOR kind of explains to the user that "yea, but a bunch of other teams would do the same thing".
Do you ever provide the numerical data alongside it?
I like being able to see the difference between rankings, as sometimes the difference between, say, 2 and 3 is bigger than the difference between 4 and 10.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:43 am to skrayper
I have it - will screenshot and post
Posted on 9/22/21 at 9:56 am to SummerOfGeorge
Added to first post
Posted on 9/22/21 at 12:32 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Serious question:
How the heck can Oklahoma be ranked so high when their 3 wins are the following:
Win over FCS Western Carolina
Narrow win over Tulane, who was destroyed by Ole Miss
Narrow win over Nebraska, who lost to Illinois
How in the world does that garner a #12 Strength of Record and a #13 Game Control rating?
I mean it sort of puts into doubt the entire list.
How the heck can Oklahoma be ranked so high when their 3 wins are the following:
Win over FCS Western Carolina
Narrow win over Tulane, who was destroyed by Ole Miss
Narrow win over Nebraska, who lost to Illinois
How in the world does that garner a #12 Strength of Record and a #13 Game Control rating?
I mean it sort of puts into doubt the entire list.
This post was edited on 9/22/21 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 9/22/21 at 12:38 pm to SummerOfGeorge
uhhh O$U way to low . They are still top 10 team duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 
Posted on 9/22/21 at 12:39 pm to nastywideouts
please IOwa would shut down Ole Mississisppi . They havent seen a defense like Iowa's . duhhhhhhh 
Posted on 9/22/21 at 12:42 pm to massilsu
quote:
uhhh O$U way to low . They are still top 10 team duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
OSU is only in any Top 10 because of their name.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 12:45 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
How in the world does that garner a #12 Strength of Record and a #13 Game Control rating?
That is a very good question. I'd assume on SOR because Nebraska is ranked #31 in FPI and Tulane #69 - and I think that SOR basically treats 1AA games as not even happening, so it would look at Oklahoma as having played 2 games against an average opponent of #50 or so. And that's probably higher than most, I'd guess.
That's my guess at least. As far as game control, they were ahead vs Tulane and Nebraska basically the entire games, so I'd guess that plays into it, compared to say A&M who trailed Colorado for most of their game
Posted on 9/22/21 at 2:26 pm to SummerOfGeorge
ok ill buy that for now but BAMA is #1 for their name only as well .Georgia would shut them down . Oregon would beat them on neutral field etc...BAMA is prob 4 or5 realistically right now
Posted on 9/22/21 at 2:31 pm to massilsu
quote:
ok ill buy that for now but BAMA is #1 for their name only as well .
#1? Maybe. Ranked in the top 5? Clearly not.
Posted on 9/22/21 at 3:07 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Iowa would beat BAMA . Mich St would be an even game vs BAMA . BAMA is a bit overrated this yr .Just like Clemson and Tex AM are heavily overrated .I know more about college football in my left than all u necks know yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesummerofgeorgefartscumeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 9/22/21 at 3:11 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Its about time Arkansas helped our SOS instead of hurting it.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News