Started By
Message

re: Cecil Interview

Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:51 am to
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:51 am to
quote:

If the NCAA happens to catch wind of this, I would take it as a slap in the face! Mocking them


I am sure it has been faxed and emailed to them many times..
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
15925 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:54 am to
well - just reading the OP - i wondered how long it would take an ATPB'r to post here - is probly taking the info in the thread back to his mindless Coven so they have new FAP material.

and no AU77 - i was not refering to you :)
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Regardless - Cecil needs to just keep his yaw shut - all it does is create buzz - if he truly wants to let it settle - he needs to stay out of the lime light, as much as possible, and keep quiet.

interviews like this will do nothing more than create a feeding frenzy for the bottom dwellers in the media - IE Finebaum, SbB and others.


I agree 100%, but that will not happen... He is a preacher; preachers preach...
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
15925 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:55 am to
quote:

I agree 100%, but that will not happen... He is a preacher; preachers preach...


true that - but one can hope :P
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21521 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:55 am to
Just let this die, you're arguing with a flamer, it's pointless. Cecil's comments will always be ambiguous, it's something Auburn just has to accept and be glad he's gone
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Cecil's comments will always be ambiguous, it's something Auburn just has to accept


this.

quote:

and be glad he's gone


not this.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:02 am to
quote:

See thats what i never understood about the whole situation, cecil and cam would never come out and say no, they would just kinda find away around the subject, idk why they cant just own up and say yes or no.


Now the haters and the bammers will have to say the NCAA lying. Kind of puts a hole in their credibility, smart move by Cecil.
This post was edited on 7/1/11 at 9:06 am
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21521 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:04 am to
quote:

and be glad he's gone
quote:

not this.


You aren't glad Cecil is gone?
Posted by Itsme2011
Member since Jan 2011
855 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:12 am to
quote:

quote:
and be glad he's gone
quote:
not this.

You aren't glad Cecil is gone?



No he's not. That's the father of the golden chosen one! duh!
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You aren't glad Cecil is gone?


You take the good with the bad.

And Cam Newton's play > Cecil being a dumb-arse
Posted by MattP598
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
1920 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:18 am to
quote:

As to MSU, being asked by somebody to provide money for play is not a fault of a university unless they agree to it. That fault belongs to the one asking.


And how do you know it wasn't Rogers who brought the whole plan to Cecil??

I still believe Newton would of went to MSU had Kenny Rogers not tried to make a buck off of him.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Remember there is a loophole, the NCAA does NOT have a rule against solicitation... Maybe that is part of it.


They most certainly do. The loophole lies in the actual player having knowledge.
Posted by MattP598
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
1920 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Remember there is a loophole, the NCAA does NOT have a rule against solicitation... Maybe that is part of it.



They most certainly do. The loophole lies in the actual player having knowledge.


From what I heard it wouldn't of mattered if Cam knew or not. If no money changed hands he is not ineligible.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Thanks you fricking dildo. Appreciate it.




Dude's a preacher and you can't even believe what he says. He must not be familiar with the book of John. The "truth shall set you free" Cecil.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:26 am to
quote:

From what I heard it wouldn't of mattered if Cam knew or not. If no money changed hands he is not ineligible.


Then why would the NCAA allow this to be said by one of it's own?
quote:

NCAA spokesperson Stacey Osburn told The Birmingham News by email that "the solicitation of cash or benefits by a prospective student-athlete or another individual on his or her behalf is not allowed under NCAA rules."
Posted by tkane311
Mo-billionaire
Member since Oct 2009
2336 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:28 am to
quote:

From what I heard it wouldn't of mattered if Cam knew or not. If no money changed hands he is not ineligible.


Not true..direcly from Mike Slive: if no AGREEMENT for $ to change hands was made...not that it makes any difference here. I am still nearly certain that Auburn or a booster didn't buy Cam. But I am less certain today than I was yesterday that Cecil didn't talk to AU about $. Why would you answer in that "plausible deniability" manner if it didn't happen? He sounded like Mark McGuire talking to congress about steroid use. I wouldn't preferred the Rafael Palmeiro approach.
Posted by MattP598
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
1920 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:29 am to
Dunno....I believe it was the lawyer Donald Jackson who said it wouldn't of mattered on the Finebaum show.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:38 am to
quote:

He said the NCAA has the truth. The NCAA has already said they have not found where AU paid Newton anything. A=B B=C A=C do the math.


That wasn't the question. The question was, "did you solicit money from AU?". Pretty fukn simple question right? Cause there's only two answers: yes or no.
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Then why would the NCAA allow this to be said by one of it's own?


The NCAA already said that Cam Newton could have known he was being shopped, but it wouldn't have mattered. They said that is not a violation.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 7/1/11 at 9:41 am to
quote:

I agree 100%, but that will not happen... He is a preacher; preachers preach...


He's also a known solicitor; solicitors solicit...
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter