Started By
Message
re: Can we all admire how terrible these calls were?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:53 pm to bmy
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:53 pm to bmy
Targeting
Targeting
Your only hope in any argument about this is to say it wasn't intentional, which #1 was and #2 was probably foolish lack of control by a player who is accustomed to getting away with this type of penalty activity by claiming it was an accident.
Targeting
Your only hope in any argument about this is to say it wasn't intentional, which #1 was and #2 was probably foolish lack of control by a player who is accustomed to getting away with this type of penalty activity by claiming it was an accident.
1
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:54 pm to MeridianDog
Lol no. You have 8 pages of homework to catch up on.
Let's see some similar ejections where the rule was enforced in the same manner.
Let's see some similar ejections where the rule was enforced in the same manner.
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:58 pm to bmy
quote:
you're kidding which of those hits were unsafe?
Petition your president to go to NCAA and have the rule changed.
LSU is a big program. If you withdraw from NCAA they will probably change the rule to keep you happy.
Wait a minute?
You are not that big or important?
They won't?
OK - I have received a ruling from NCAA.
You are shite out of luck.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:59 pm to MeridianDog
quote:
OK - I have received a ruling from NCAA.
You are shite out of luck
They ruled this targeting an ejection too even after review
minnesota vs Purdue
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:59 pm to MeridianDog
quote:
Your only hope in any argument about this is to say it wasn't intentional,
Intent doesn't factor into it; pulling up doesn't factor into it.
The rule may be despised, but it is the rule.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:00 pm to BoardReader
quote:
Intent doesn't factor into it; pulling up doesn't factor into it.
The rule may be despised, but it is the rule.
Demonstrably false. Read a few pages prior.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:00 pm to bmy
#48 hits the QB's helmet with the crown of his while loading up and leaving his feet. As cut and dried as it gets.
The other retard takes 2 steps after the ball is thrown and hits helmet to helmet. Again, simple for everyone to see not in a state that calls counties parishes.
The other retard takes 2 steps after the ball is thrown and hits helmet to helmet. Again, simple for everyone to see not in a state that calls counties parishes.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:02 pm to SoFla Tideroller
no.Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:03 pm to bmy
All three were bad and the offensive pass interference cost us a TD. But none of them cost LSU the game. MSU outplayed us, no question. LSU got their butts handed to them along with their pride. Hope they can shake it off going forward but my hope is waning.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:03 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Demonstrably false. Read a few pages prior.
Demonstrably true. Hell, look at the Minnesota-Purdue targeting-- the kid ducked his head to avoid a bigger head to head hit, arguably. Didn't help him, because it still was helmet to facemask on the backside-- though it could have been much worse had he actually been headhunting. It was still ruled correctly, and got him tossed.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:04 pm to bmy
That's Bush league Also makes bmy further look like an idiot
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:05 pm to BoardReader
quote:
Demonstrably true. Hell, look at the Minnesota-Purdue targeting-- the kid ducked his head to avoid a bigger head to head hit, arguably. Didn't help him, because it still was helmet to facemask on the backside-- though it could have been much worse had he actually been headhunting. It was still ruled correctly, and got him tossed
The officials were wrong. The hit was delivered with the shoulder in a perfectly legal manner.
The rules clearly require intent to satisfy any targeting call.
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:14 pm to bmy
quote:
bmy
I will give you this. If I want to ring a guy's chimes I would do just what those two defenders did and whack him in the face guard with my helmet. If that is what I was taught, somewhere in my mind I would understand that the intent of such a hit is to take the QB out of the game.
Do the defensive players at LSU practice this in order to get so good at it that folks like you can question the severity of the hit when the officials throw a flag and then laugh at "That pussy" when the opposing QB gets a stinger that puts him out of the game, or breaks his neck and leaves him paralyzed from the chest down?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:21 pm to bmy
quote:
Where exactly was he "taking aim" at if not the neck/helemt area? at the shoulders/chest area. clearly not the neck. clearly a horrible call and i won't be surprised when the suspension is lifted. he won't get an apology though.
Suspension lifted?
Get an apology?
Don't hold your breath on either.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 3:27 pm to bmy
That PI was correct. It was a pick play and they called it on MSU a few drives later for the exact same thing
The roughing the passer calls were correct as well as targeting. I don't think the players deserved to be ejected though
The roughing the passer calls were correct as well as targeting. I don't think the players deserved to be ejected though
Posted on 9/17/17 at 5:50 pm to pvilleguru
no but I think you probably are
Posted on 9/17/17 at 6:01 pm to bmy
quote:
The rules clearly require intent to satisfy any targeting call.
You can keep saying this all you want, but since targeting became a focus in football, whether it is how the rule is written or not, the refs flag it without giving two shits about intent. Contact to the head of a defenseless player with helmet or pads, flag. Every fan, coach, or fricking two year old in the country would tell you this.
Sure, maybe the rule doesn't read like that...but you coach your players up on how shite gets called in the real world. Like holding; grab handfuls of jersey all you want between the tits, and it won't get called even though by rule it is holding.
Give it up man.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 6:32 pm to bmy
All three were good calls
Posted on 9/17/17 at 7:31 pm to BloodRunsRed&Black
quote:
You can keep saying this all you want, but since targeting became a focus in football, whether it is how the rule is written or not, the refs flag it without giving two shits about intent
Thank you. Is this so difficult for people to admit that that officiating crews enforce this penalty outside of the rulebook?
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News