Started By
Message
re: Bogus National Title claims: Alabama claims 18 but most are questionable
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:46 am to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:46 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
So, in conclusion
- Double the national titles of #2 all time
- More national titles than the entire rest of the SEC combined
- More national titles in the last 7 years than anyone else in CFB has in their 100+ year histories
Sounds like even more reason to pop off about our national titles. Thanks Chicken.
I love this thread
1
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:27 am to Chicken
quote:
Florida (2): 2006, 2008
No 1996!!! Thread is crap!
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:28 am to Old Hellen Yeller
Bama Rules
Posted on 4/2/18 at 1:01 pm to Chicken
Dang . . . people still triggered by what Bama claims. You ain’t gotta claim it - but they do. Get over it.
Lawd have mercy.
Lawd have mercy.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 1:29 pm to Bham4Tide
The troll that keeps on giving. 
Posted on 4/2/18 at 2:45 pm to Chicken
UPDATE: UCF 2017
Posted on 4/2/18 at 2:57 pm to Chicken
quote:
Chicken
Great minds
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:09 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
Dang . . . people still triggered by what Bama claims. You ain’t gotta claim it - but they do. Get over it.
Lawd have mercy.
I mean, you would think Alabama would just drop the most blatantly egregious claims and be done with it. Without them, it's still remarkable. To each their own.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:22 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:26 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:I'm all for dropping the '41 claim and picking up the '66 title.
I mean, you would think Alabama would just drop the most blatantly egregious claims and be done with it. Without them, it's still remarkable. To each their own.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:33 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
I mean, you would think Alabama would just drop the most blatantly egregious claims and be done with it. Without them, it's still remarkable. To each their own.
Which ones are "blatantly egregious claims" besides 1941?
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:34 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
I mean, you would think Alabama would just drop the most blatantly egregious claims and be done with it. Without them, it's still remarkable. To each their own.
I agree. When Bama wins the NC next year I'm all for them just leaving the number at 17 and just dropping 1941. We won't even have to get new t-shirts. Easy fix.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:36 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
I'm all for dropping the '41 claim and picking up the '66 title.
Drop '41 and pick up '45, '66 and '77. Two of those would've resulted in 3-peats.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:36 pm to Korin
quote:
Which ones are "blatantly egregious claims" besides 1941?
That's beyond blatantly egregious, so let's start with that one.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:37 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
I'm all for dropping the '41 claim and picking up the '66 title.
I mean whatever keeps your dick hard.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:40 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
That's beyond blatantly egregious, so let's start with that one.
You said claims, not claim.
And why should they drop 1941 when other SEC programs have similar claims? You don't get mad over them though. I wonder why...
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 4/2/18 at 4:52 pm to Korin
quote:
And why should they drop 1941 when other SEC programs have similar claims?
This thread isn't about the other programs, is it?
Auburn doesn't, so that's all that matters to me. Are you a UF Bama dick rider or something?
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 4/2/18 at 5:00 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
I mean whatever keeps your dick hard.
Oh my dick’s been hard since January.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 5:01 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Oh my dick’s been hard since January.
I'm happy for you, glad male college athletes have that effect on your libido.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 5:52 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
This thread isn't about the other programs, is it?
Page 43 of 121
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News