Started By
Message
re: Big 6 question regarding Auburn
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:58 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:58 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
2007
Disagree
quote:
2002
2004 was basically 2002 all grown up.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 11:04 pm
1
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:00 pm to RandySavage
quote:
I guess you're going to give that 2011 title back to LSU?
While I will never claim that Texas beat Auburn like a drum in 1983, the losses aren't comparable. If that 2011 game is played using the rules of 1983 (before conference championship games), Alabama-LSU ends in a 6-6 tie. Both teams would finish the season 12-0-1, SEC champions, and would also most likely split the national championship.
Auburn lost to Texas by two touchdowns.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:04 pm to BowlJackson
You must be drunk
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:04 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Nope.
Yes.
quote:
2004 was basically 2002 all grown up.
That doesn't mean anything. 1994 Alabama was basically 1992 Alabama all-grown up. '92 Alabama won hardware. '94 Alabama did not.
The difference was the senior leadership that was on the two earlier teams. They were missing from 1994 Alabama and 2004 Georgia.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:06 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Yes.
Well I guess that settles it.
quote:
That doesn't mean anything. 1994 Alabama was basically 1992 Alabama all-grown up. '92 Alabama won hardware. '94 Alabama did not.
2002 may have been a little better but it's close. 02 was a 4th and 15 against AU from not even playing for the SEC title. The only real difference in those two UGA teams is 02 UGA didn't have to play 04 AU otherwise they would have ended up the exact same.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:08 pm to RandySavage
Back to the OP though, there was a similar thread a while back where I showed that AU has one less perfect/undefeated seasons as the other four members not named Alabama combined.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:15 pm to Mootsman
Warms my heart to see big 6 defending big 6 in here 
Except for BowlJackson. That douche is determined to derail every thread with his shite posting
Except for BowlJackson. That douche is determined to derail every thread with his shite posting
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:17 pm to Mootsman
Nobody wanted to watch USC beat the shite out of Auburn for the 3rd year in a row 
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:21 pm to BowlJackson
I never said Texas deserved to win the NC, just that they were more deserving than Auburn. 
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:23 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Oh yea, your comment is still ignorant. It's like you forget hat losing late has always punished a team more than losing early.
Like Okie State in 2011?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:28 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
If 13 is "molesting" then what is a 25 point win?
It was 20 to zero in the 4th quarter with 1:34 left in the game.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:33 pm to RandySavage
quote:
guess you're going to give that 2011 title back to LSU?
As soon as Texas gives the 1983 title back to Auburn.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:48 pm to Comp721
quote:
Except for BowlJackson. That douche is determined to derail every thread with his shite posting
By SECrant standards I guess statistics and facts would be considered shite posting.... especially when it makes your team look bad!
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:49 pm to cajunbama
quote:
It was 20 to zero in the 4th quarter with 1:34 left in the game.
Damn, you're old.
Now the fact that you make alters and have conversations with yourself online with different accounts has gone from funny/ pathetic to just plain sad... I feel bad for you now, man.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:52 pm to Dick Tracy
quote:
You must be drunk
No, actually I can just read and use the internet to look at rosters and see how the careers of players turned out... crazy, ain't it?
If you can look at the 2004 USC roster and the 2004 Auburn roster top to bottom and convince yourself that USC was more talented or deeper than Auburn in 2004 then you're the drunk one and holding on a little too hard to decade and a half old ESPN propaganda
Posted on 6/23/17 at 6:57 am to cajunbama
quote:
in what was the biggest home game in Auburn history up to that time.
Bigger than the first Iron Bowl at home?
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:19 am to DuncanIdaho
The reason Auburn didn't get in the title game in 04' is because they played USC in a home and home series in 2002 and 2003 and lost both games. The 02 game was close but the 2003 game was a blow out at home. Voters didn't want to see an Auburn vs USC pt.3 so they gave OU a shot even though the 04 Auburn team had the better SOS and beat more ranked teams.
OU and USC were entrenched at #1 and #2 all year while Auburn started #19 in the polls.
If it were the old system Auburn could easily claim it as Bama does for 75% of their titles
OU and USC were entrenched at #1 and #2 all year while Auburn started #19 in the polls.
If it were the old system Auburn could easily claim it as Bama does for 75% of their titles
This post was edited on 6/23/17 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:27 am to Mootsman
Look up 1983 Auburn.
That team deserved the national championship and is why this thread sucks.
I may make a thread on the subject but the cliff notes are:
Auburn finishes regular season with the #1 SOS in the nation and ranked #3 behind two undefeated teams.
The two undefeated teams, #1 Nebraska and #2 Texas, both lose in their bowl games. #3 Auburn wins their bowl game against Michigan.
#5 Miami, who beat #1 Nebraska, and had a shitty resume compared to any of the teams mentioned above, jumps Auburn to win the national championship.
That team deserved the national championship and is why this thread sucks.
I may make a thread on the subject but the cliff notes are:
Auburn finishes regular season with the #1 SOS in the nation and ranked #3 behind two undefeated teams.
The two undefeated teams, #1 Nebraska and #2 Texas, both lose in their bowl games. #3 Auburn wins their bowl game against Michigan.
#5 Miami, who beat #1 Nebraska, and had a shitty resume compared to any of the teams mentioned above, jumps Auburn to win the national championship.
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:29 am to cajunbama
quote:
Zero chance you win against USC. They had just beat the brakes off of AU in back to back seasons. The nation didn't want to see three in three years.
Do you even know who the QB was for USC in 2002?
In fact, did you even watch the game?
In fact, who the frick cares about 2002 and 2003 football games when talking about 2004.
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:30 am to Ross
quote:
Do you even know who the QB was for USC in 2002?
In fact, did you even watch the game?
In fact, who the frick cares about 2002 and 2003 football games when talking about 2004.
You are talking to CajunBama here...
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News