Started By
Message
re: Best QB In The SEC
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:47 pm to HogFanfromHTown
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:47 pm to HogFanfromHTown
Ya, he didn't think about that too much 
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:48 pm to HogFanfromHTown
He prefers his beauty pageant woman more masculine like Katherine Webb.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:48 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Drew Lock?
Not enough people have seen Drew play yet this year. There is a WORLD of difference between Drew Lock in 2015 and 2016.
Plus, his numbers are gaudy, but half of them are against vastly inferior opponents. So, without watching him and seeing the improvement, people overlook him. Heupel has this offense rolling.
That's OK. I like us being under the radar.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:49 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
That contest is like going to the Miss Arkansas Beauty Pagent. Not many contestants and very average talent to choose from.
Lol you might want to look at where Miss America is from.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:49 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
The answer is Drew Lock.
Bias aside, he's a top 2 draft pick after next year.
Allen is another grind it out guy. Kinda perfect for Arky. But not a true elite talent.
Bias aside, he's a top 2 draft pick after next year.
Allen is another grind it out guy. Kinda perfect for Arky. But not a true elite talent.
This post was edited on 9/26/16 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:50 pm to Supreme Tiger
Allen is elite. You'll find out.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:51 pm to semotruman
Missouri is averaging 467 yards, 5.3 YPP and 19 points per game against Power 5 teams. Drew Lock is 46/89 (51.7%) with 4 TD/3 INT and a 121.7 QB rating vs Power 5 teams, and those are not 2 great defenses (WVU and UGA).
Eastern Michigan and Delaware State are dreadfully awful.
Not saying Lock is bad, but I think it's legitimate for people to want to see him play really well against even semi-decent competition before anointing him a top QB.
Eastern Michigan and Delaware State are dreadfully awful.
Not saying Lock is bad, but I think it's legitimate for people to want to see him play really well against even semi-decent competition before anointing him a top QB.
This post was edited on 9/26/16 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:51 pm to semotruman
quote:
Not enough people have seen Drew play yet this year. There is a WORLD of difference between Drew Lock in 2015 and 2016.
I agree with not enough people have seen him but the issue was the game in which most people saw was the Georgia game. I think he played decent but threw too many picks. We also just saw that defense get lit up by Ole Miss. I think Lock is going to be really good as he gets more experience.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:51 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Dude, it's Chad Kelly and it's not even close.
Chad Kelly is an average but does average very well, if that makes sense.
You can find a Chad Kelly on any department store shelf.
Guy is mentally sound and a good athlete but he's just not special.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:53 pm to Supreme Tiger
quote:
Chad Kelly is an average but does average very well, if that makes sense.
You can find a Chad Kelly on any department store shelf.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:53 pm to Triple Daves
quote:
Missouri is averaging 467 yards, 5.3 YPP and 19 points per game against Power 5 teams. Drew Lock is 46/89 (51.7%) with 4 TD/3 INT vs Power 5 teams, and those are not 2 great defenses (WVU and UGA).
Eastern Michigan and Delaware State are dreadfully awful.
Not saying Lock is bad, but I think it's legitimate for people to want to see him play really well against even semi-decent competition before anointing him a top QB.
This is just awful use of your brain.
This isn't game 85 in the baseball season. Stats like that are pretty silly at this point in the season.
Of course we all want to see him dominate against better teams, but there's an undeniable elite talent there that exceeds what anyone else in the league has.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:53 pm to Supreme Tiger
quote:
Bias aside, he's a top 2 draft pick after next year.

Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:53 pm to Supreme Tiger
quote:
You can find a Chad Kelly on any department store shelf.
That's not true at all. Kelly's arm talent and feet are incredibly good.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:54 pm to semotruman
quote:
Plus, his numbers are gaudy, but half of them are against vastly inferior opponents
Only half? I agree he looks vastly improved, but you really haven't played a good defense yet. I want to see what he looks like when someone actually brings some pressure on him.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:54 pm to Supreme Tiger
Meh, Chad Kelly is an average decision maker. Talent level is out of the roof. The throws he makes puts him in a lone category in the sec.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:54 pm to Supreme Tiger
quote:
Stats like that are pretty silly at this point in the season
He is barely completing 50% of his passes on 90 attempts.
quote:
there's an undeniable elite talent there that exceeds what anyone else in the league has.
That's just goofy
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:56 pm to Drewbie
quote:
Does nothing but throw jump balls and watch his ridiculously good WR corps come down with it. Less athletic Manziel. I wonder how much of this board is just following the hivemind and how many of them have actually watched Kelly play. Allen WAY more accurate. The amount of times I saw Kelly throw behind his receivers on slants against Georgia was insane, and he wasn't even getting rushed. Allen was dropping it on the numbers over the middle over linebackers and under safeties while getting hammered making the throw. The Kelly koolaid is artificially sweetened.
I've watched Kelly toss several perfect passes against Bama. He definitely has his moments where you think he's playing a game of 500. But he's got a very good arm and accuracy. I'm glad we're done playing him.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 3:57 pm to Triple Daves
Isn't Kelly a 5th year guy?
RS first year at Clemson?
He's good. No doubt.
But think what we're seeing now is more due to the fact he's a man out there.
RS first year at Clemson?
He's good. No doubt.
But think what we're seeing now is more due to the fact he's a man out there.
Popular
Back to top


0







