Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:20 pm to lynxcat
quote:
Yes, I can. I personally know the person that took the picture. I could get a look at the original if I wanted.
Liar.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:20 pm to Alabama Slim
Thanks Pete for making the play of the game! 
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
As great of a shot as that is, still frames never tell the whole story.
That's the best you've got?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:21 pm to magiLSU
quote:
A. Show me proof Jones touched it.
Show proof he didn't.
(FYI, this is why my stance on the issue is that there isn't enough evidence to overturn in either case, whether it was ruled a INT or incompletion).
quote:
B. Doesn't matter if he did or not, because it would be illegal touching, not a dead ball, and the INT would stand.
Wrong. Learn the rules.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:22 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
Jones touched the ball first while he had stepped out and the ball is at that moment out of play. so it doesn't really matter.
You must be a SEC ref to come to that conclusion.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:23 pm to Dribble
quote:truth hurts huh?
Liar.
everyone knows the truth. We actually moved up to 8 in the bcs.
if you guys do win a nc, you will lose it when you get on probation.
no one likes slimmy cheaters who don't deserve what they "think" they earned
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:23 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Then post the rule.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:23 pm to JPLSU1981
He's out of bounds.
He bobbled the ball.
Julio touched it first.
Wow.
Bama fans will say anything to preserve their delusion. Even when irrefutable evidence is shown them, they still won't believe it. That kind of fanbase has absolutely no credibility in any conversation regarding football.
New litmus test: Either you admit it was an interception (as every bit of evidence clearly shows - and as many sane Bama fans already have) or every opinion that you offer on this board from this point forward is null and void.
For all the Bama fans who admit to the truth: I respect that and wish you well. You are decent people. Enjoy your win and your trip to Atlanta for the SEC Championship Game. I wish you well.
For those who STILL REFUSE to admit, you're just sad.
He bobbled the ball.
Julio touched it first.
Wow.
Bama fans will say anything to preserve their delusion. Even when irrefutable evidence is shown them, they still won't believe it. That kind of fanbase has absolutely no credibility in any conversation regarding football.
New litmus test: Either you admit it was an interception (as every bit of evidence clearly shows - and as many sane Bama fans already have) or every opinion that you offer on this board from this point forward is null and void.
For all the Bama fans who admit to the truth:
I respect that and wish you well. You are decent people. Enjoy your win and your trip to Atlanta for the SEC Championship Game. I wish you well. For those who STILL REFUSE to admit, you're just sad.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:24 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
Jones touched the ball first while he had stepped out and the ball is at that moment out of play. so it doesn't really matter.
You are out of your mind. Jones never got close to the ball. And that's not what the discussion was about.
Jones arms aren't long enough to reach that far.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:24 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Oh BTW, if Jones did touch it first while out of bounds, it's illegal touching,
You keep saying this, and you're wrong.
Is it ever illegal touching when a guy runs an out route and catches it while out of bounds? No, it's just an incompletion.
Illegal touching is when a guy runs out of bounds, comes back into the field of play, and then touches it (and it has the same result as an incompletion, FWIW, so it doesn't even matter). Julio was in bounds, then went out of bounds as he touched it. It's not the same thing.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:25 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
what the hell are you guys taliking about?? Jones never touched the fricking ball. And even if he did, i still see PP with it in posession in bounds.
so if it touches someone, he can't intercept it???
so if it touches someone, he can't intercept it???
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:25 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
Show proof he didn't.
Go on youtube and look it up and then tell me that JJ touched that ball first.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:25 pm to dreaux
quote:
PP with it in posession in bounds.
He was out...
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:26 pm to dreaux
quote:
so if it touches someone, he can't intercept it???
If it touches someone while they're out of bounds, no, they can't intercept it, because it's incomplete.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:26 pm to Dribble
You gumps always provide me with a good laugh.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:26 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Buckeye, the rule is pretty clear...
Again, there is no other interpretation...
If jones was in bounds and touched it = regular play, Peterson INT
IF jones was out of bounds and touched it = illegal touching
All that said, it's pretty clear he didn't touch it, not to mention that was not the call.
quote:
Eligibility Lost by Going Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 4. No eligible offensive receiver who goes out of bounds during a
down shall touch a legal forward pass in the field of play or end zones or while
airborne until it has been touched by an opponent or official (A.R. 7-3-4-I-III).
[Exception: This does not apply to an eligible offensive player who attempts
to return inbounds immediately after going out of bounds due to contact by an
opponent (A.R. 7-3-4-IV)].
Again, there is no other interpretation...
If jones was in bounds and touched it = regular play, Peterson INT
IF jones was out of bounds and touched it = illegal touching
All that said, it's pretty clear he didn't touch it, not to mention that was not the call.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:27 pm to dreaux
If someone touches the ball who is out of bounds, it can't be intercepted by an opposing player.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 9:28 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
f it touches someone while they're out of bounds, no, they can't intercept it, because it's incomplete.
Moot point. Jones wasn't close enough to reach around PP to touch the ball. Period.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News