Started By
Message

re: BCSGuru & BCSKnowHow projected OSU will be #2 in the BCS *UPDATED*

Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:36 am to
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12613 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:36 am to
quote:

That is not correct, bcsknowhow is correct.



What about this?

quote:

utomatic qualification
1. The top two teams in the final BCS Standings shall play in the National Championship Game.

2. The champions of the Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and Southeastern conferences will have automatic berths in one of the participating bowls through the 2013 regular season.

3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, or the Western Athletic Conference will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or,
B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.) If two or more teams from those conferences satisfy the provisions for an automatic berth, then the team with the highest finish in the final BCS Standings will receive the automatic berth, and the remaining team or teams will be considered for at-large selection if it meets the criteria.

4. Notre Dame will have an automatic berth if it is in the top eight of the final BCS Standings.

5. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

6. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 5, and if no team qualifies under paragraph No. 5 and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 4 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 1:37 am
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12613 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:41 am to
Stanford would be 4, making it an autobid.

BCSKnowHow says that Stanford is not guaranteed an autobid.

Am I missing something?

Because if they missed an oversight such as this, whatever they say predicting the final BCS standings looks like total garbage
Posted by chipd
Seattle
Member since Jul 2011
373 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:51 am to
What kills me is all this arguing to decide who the number 2 team is....kind of makes me wonder why we need a BCSCG. Obviously LSU is #1
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13975 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:11 am to
I would rather them give LSU the NC and have Bama play OSU. Just to show who should have played them.
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 2:13 am
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:15 am to
mmm the bama tears are so sweet
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12613 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:15 am to
Tell me how:

quote:

If these projections hold up, it will be. Stanford at No. 4, will not be afforded an automatic bid to the BCS as it was last season at No. 4, but will likely be a very eligible team for any BCS bowl to select.


And

quote:

If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 5, and if no team qualifies under paragraph No. 5 and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 4 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.


don't conflict?

Am I missing some weird exception?
Posted by HMTVBrian2
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
5760 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:23 am to
Because alabama will be #3 and take that auto spot
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12613 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:03 am to
quote:

Because alabama will be #3 and take that auto spot



Ah. I see.

It's 3 OR 4, if they're both non-conference winners.
Posted by ultratiger89
Houston, Tx
Member since Aug 2007
3311 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 6:05 am to
quote:

Any "projection" is just a guess


no shite sherlock
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 6:16 am to
I still think Bama will go, but I will enjoy the agony of TD and my in laws all day today!
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:44 am to
quote:

mmm the bama tears are so sweet



this is going to be a fun day of anticipation.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37469 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:45 am to
You need to do better than self-proclaimed anonymous "guru" tweeters.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86494 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:46 am to
He's a butthurt cow fan,you really expect the retard to do better than that?
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:48 am to
quote:

You need to do better than self-proclaimed anonymous "guru" tweeters.





This is Samuel Chi. He is "BCSGuru". He is Chinese. Chinese are number crunchers.

LINK
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 7:50 am
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
13770 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 7:52 am to
Squirm
Bama
Squirm



But fret not, ESPN has already committed to heavily to allow anyone else but Bama.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37469 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:10 am to
Not really. But it doesn't hurt to try and help the boy.
Posted by taylormade
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
9863 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:11 am to
Time to roll toomers!

LINK

Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
54963 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:12 am to
quote:

BCSKnowHow says that Stanford is not guaranteed an autobid.

Am I missing something?

Because if they missed an oversight such as this, whatever they say predicting the final BCS standings looks like total garbage


Stanford didn't win the Pac 10 (got blown out by Oregon)...why would they get in a BCS game over Champs?
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 8:12 am to
Must take more xanax.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter