Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:01 am to diddydirtyAubie
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:03 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
:Bamaobsessed:
5:51
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:04 am to TTsTowel
quote:He has this wrong already
The final BCS Standings will be close between OSU and Alabama, with the computers unanimously locking in the CowboysatNo.2 and Alabama at No. 3. And then it would be up to the voters to render their final verdict.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 am to chilld28
It's going to be close. I say this while listening to Musburger tell me Bama is in the Championship game on ESPN.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 am to chilld28
Maybe not.
Drop the high and low polls and it may well be unanimous.
Drop the high and low polls and it may well be unanimous.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 am to chilld28
not really.. High and low thrown out, it means that he projects OSU as #2 in the 4 polls that will count
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 am to chilld28
Top and bottom don't matter though. If middle 4 lock, then it is unanimous for the BCS's purposes.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:05 am to chilld28
Dude the computer towhich you refer has been dropped for the last month it means nothing and was anticipated by most
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:08 am to chilld28
At the risk of sounding like a gump, this guy is just stating his opinion on how he thinks the votes will turn out. I don't even think the voters themselves know how it's going to turn out yet.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:09 am to Tiger Attorney
I bet bama boosters are busy tonight on the phones and writing up checks to buy up all the votes.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 am to TTsTowel
Enough said. Dude doesn't know shite. He could be correct, but it won't be why he stated.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:10 am to diddydirtyAubie
Brad Edwards is silent
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:11 am to Rabern57
quote:
I bet bama boosters are busy tonight on the phones and writing up checks to buy up all the votes.
My money's on T Boone if that's the angle...
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:12 am to diddydirtyAubie
Did this BCSKnowHow say Stanford was not an autoBCS lock at number 4?
Isn't that 100% false by rule?
Isn't that 100% false by rule?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:14 am to tiger1014
quote:
Did this BCSKnowHow say Stanford was not an autoBCS lock at number 4?
Isn't that 100% false by rule?
I don't know. I believe they are an at large bid and they brought a shitty crowd to Miami last year.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:16 am to chilld28
quote:
He has this wrong already
Lost, eh?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:17 am to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
My money's on T Boone if that's the angle...
This.
Dude's stinking rich and will take Bama boosters to the woodshed.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:21 am to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
I don't know. I believe they are an at large bid and they brought a shitty crowd to Miami last year.
Doesn't matter.
Barring 3 or 4 being the third team from a conference (i.e. not being the autobid or 1 or 2 in the BCS standings), the 3 and 4 teams in the BCS standings are guaranteed an at-large birth.
One of the bowls MUST select them.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:30 am to tiger1014
quote:
One of the bowls MUST select them.
That is not correct, bcsknowhow is correct.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News