Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:07 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:Really? Most I’ve seen have the player’s/coach’s name on one side.
I'm certain it is, but is this something new? I've never seen a player's name on the outside of a ring.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:09 pm to Atxgump
quote:
I sucked my dog's dick today.
FIFY. I think this is what you meant to say.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:09 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
A lot of UGA fans are pumped about being runner-up, so there's that.
But their team actually won the conference and will get legitimate rings for it.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:11 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:
I've never seen a player's name on the outside of a ring.
Every state championship ring at our school has the athlete or coach's name on it.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:13 pm to lsufball19
That says #2 
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:15 pm to Atxgump
You won’t do it...
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:15 pm to AHM21
I bet even Missouri doesnt make Division Champs rings
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:17 pm to Glorious
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:18 pm to Glorious
Never understood why you'd need to talk down the achievement of a team, even if they failed at their ultimate goals or goal. It's possible to be proud to be SEC West Champions and still be disappointed in not winning the SEC.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:19 pm to AHM21
I feel confident that Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Mississippi State won't have to worry about whether or not they'd make rings for winning the West for a long, long time
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:20 pm to AHM21
No “#10 nationally”..?
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:22 pm to Barstools
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:23 pm to DoubleBubbleTrouble
Ouch
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:26 pm to DoubleBubbleTrouble
So richt
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:27 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Never understood why you'd need to talk down the achievement of a team, even if they failed at their ultimate goals or goal.
Participation trophies and orange slices for all!
Revel in the Age of Inclusion.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:29 pm to AHM21
I know that ring gets a lot of hate obviously because of the “#2”. But that was their SEC title rings. Not a ring for being just that, #2.
Still stupid af to put that on there.
Still stupid af to put that on there.
This post was edited on 4/17/18 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:31 pm to hg
The #2 was obviously a mistake. Symbolizing a SEC Championship should have been enough.
Was that Les’ idea?
Was that Les’ idea?
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:32 pm to AHM21
quote:
That says #2
And?
Posted on 4/17/18 at 7:39 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Participation trophies and orange slices for all!
A ring for winning something is not a trophy for participation. What you’re talking about is more reflective of when Ole Miss made rings just for playing in the peach bowl a few years ago.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News