Started By
Message
re: Auburn gave up -3 rushing yards for the game
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:29 pm to MrAUTigers
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:29 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:Its definitely one of the usual suspects from the turd fanbase. dont think its Taint because he isnt name calling like he usually does. Plus I own that loser completely now and he is avoiding me altogether.
The more I see from the packer fan, the more I am convinced it's Taint.
Got his arse banned for 5 days and now he doesnt want the smoke
0
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:34 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
They think irony is how water from the sprinkler hose tastes.
10/10
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:54 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
The more I see from the packer fan, the more I am convinced it's Taint.
Um no, you are just saying that because Saint has gone cold on the tRant after being exposed. He barely posted on the Bama board for awhile. I try to be respectful to him so I don’t get banned, but he and I don’t see eye to eye at times on the Bama board.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:57 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
You guys are so, so bad at this internet thing! It’s hilarious
It's just you, bud
Posted on 9/7/25 at 8:00 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:interesting way of saying he got his arse banned by me.
Um no, you are just saying that because Saint has gone cold on the tRant after being exposed.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 9:29 pm to AuburnTigers
To put things in perspective, Ball State lost their opener to Purdue 31-0. Purdue has been horrible for a few years. Everyone loves to talk about Florida State going 2-10 last season. Purdue went 1-11. And massacred Ball State.
Ball State might not have a very good football team.
Ball State might not have a very good football team.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 9:48 pm to captdalton
quote:yeah they suck bud. just like La Monroe sucks. it was a glorified practice where our Qb went 24/28 and we ran all over them.
Ball State might not have a very good football team.
Your Qb went 17/17. neither games mean shite
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:26 am to i am dan
quote:
using same silly qualifications other teams have used
Nope.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:28 am to AUTubaHerd
quote:
No, it wasn’t. Bama didn’t claim 1941 until decades later.
Yes. Many championships were awarded retroactively during that era. The 1941 championship claimed by Bama was awarded by a selector that is recognized by the NCAA. Auburn cannot say that about many of its new claims.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:29 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
-3 yards on 33 carries
participation trophe is in your future
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:37 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Many championships were awarded retroactively during that era. The 1941 championship claimed by Bama was awarded by a selector that is recognized by the NCAA. Auburn cannot say that about many of its new claims.
so you bought some guy a car back in the day so you could stare at some 1941 pronouncement while you are visiting Bangkok. Congrats
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:42 am to AuburnTigers
61 yards on 57 carries through 2 games now. Do I think 1yd/rush sustains? No. But they are doing well with rush defense so far.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:21 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
so you bought some guy a car back in the day so you could stare at some 1941 pronouncement while you are visiting Bangkok. Congrats
No. Bama was awarded the 1941 championship by the Houlgate System, which awarded national championships for every season from 1885-1958.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 7:27 pm to AuburnTigers
Against back ups. Your point is moot.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News