Started By
Message
re: Auburn could claim 9 National Championships
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:09 am to cwsec
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:09 am to cwsec
quote:
Your team lost to bama 49-0 I think that i would keep my mouth shut after that. You have no right to bragg about anything
Should have easily been 56-0 if we don't fumble on the 10 yard line going in to score with our 4th string running back in.
And if we would have kept our starters in the entire game, no doubt in anyone's mind Bama would have won by at least 77-0 and probably would have put up over 800 yards of offense.
0
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:11 am to RollTide1987
quote:
some people actually understand why Alabama and other teams rightfully claim national championships in years they lost their bowl game.
So what happened in 1941?
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:14 am to TT9
quote:
2010 (claimed)
*
It's nice when people point out that the 2010 BCSNC is the only one certified by the NCAA to be done without improper benefits to players.
When are the investigations of the other winning schools going to be completed?
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:15 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
So what happened in 1941?
It is a bullshite claim.
The only one that Bama has that should be removed.
Bama has 14 legit titles
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:17 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
It is a bullshite claim. The only one that Bama has that should be removed. Bama has 14 legit titles
the "rose bowl titles" arent exactly completely legit, but that topic is for another thread that I am sure will happen a few times later this year
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:18 am to NYCAuburn
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:21 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
So what happened in 1941?
Oh, you know, 11 claimed titles sounded better than 10 so the SID put 1941 in there for good measure. If you were to take a poll amongst knowledgeable Alabama fans, I'm pretty sure you'd reach a consensus in that 1941 is a crappy excuse for a title claim.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:24 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
It is a bullshite claim. The only one that Bama has that should be removed.
I understand that Bama claims the '41 title on one sole award - the Houlgate System.
LINK
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:24 am to WildTchoupitoulas
Yeah, and UT does the same exact thing for 67, but I don't see you getting butthurt over them.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:25 am to USMC Gators
quote:
Yeah, and UT does the same exact thing for 67, but I don't see you getting butthurt over them.
Their main rival is not Tennessee.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:25 am to USMC Gators
quote:
Yeah, and UT does the same exact thing for 67, but I don't see you getting butthurt over them.
Click the link in my post above.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:27 am to WildTchoupitoulas
I wasn't aware that the BCS was around in 41. That's news to me.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:27 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
ctually, Bama best exemplifies the lil bro and insecure syndrome as they made their 6 retroactive title claims at the same time Pat Dye had put bama in its place and begun the arse whuppings. Bama knew AU was their daddy at that time and it was 5 years before bama even beat AU again. But the 6 retroactive titles made bama feel like less inferior so they ran with it.
Lulz....Dye was 6-6 against Bama over the course of his AU career....and he never won a championship during that time... while Bama did....that is hardly "domintaion"
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:28 am to weagle99
and going by that same reasoning Alabama could claim 25.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:29 am to USMC Gators
quote:
I wasn't aware that the BCS was around in 41. That's news to me.
It wasn't.
The Houlgate was.
Alabama claims the 1941 title because of the Houlgate system.
That would be like LSU claiming the 2011 MNC based on the exact same award.
Sorry you're too slow to see the humor.
Better luck next time.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:29 am to USMC Gators
UT's 67 is a lot worse because the AP and Coaches had already been around for awhile by then.
1967
Notre Dame (DuS)
Oklahoma (PS)
USC (AP, B(QPRS), BR, CFRA, Coaches, DeS, FN, FWAA, HAF, MGR, NCF, NFF, SR)
Tennessee (L)
1967
Notre Dame (DuS)
Oklahoma (PS)
USC (AP, B(QPRS), BR, CFRA, Coaches, DeS, FN, FWAA, HAF, MGR, NCF, NFF, SR)
Tennessee (L)
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:30 am to USMC Gators
quote:
Yeah, and UT does the same exact thing for 67, but I don't see you getting butthurt over them
Tennessee's national title claims are waaaaaaay worse than Alabama's. And Michigan's a way worse than Tennessee's. And Pitt's are worse than all of them.
But, funny thing, no one cares about those school's claims because they are all IRRELEVANT programs.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:30 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
WildTchoupitoulas
Still rustled over 1/9/12 I see.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:30 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Alabama claims the 1941 title because of the Houlgate system.
That would be like LSU claiming the 2011 MNC based on the exact same award.
Actually...it wouldn't.
In 1941 there was no system recognized by the major conferences that awarded a national championship. The AP wasn't even as big then as it would be 10 years later.
In 2011...the BCS exists as a system agreed upon by all major conferences to award a national championship.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News