Started By
Message

re: Auburn could claim 9 National Championships

Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

It's a stupid claim, just as auburn claiming to be the 2004 champions is a stupid claim




One team was ranked #19 with two losses and 3rd in the SEC.

The other was undefeated, untied, SEC champion and Sugar Bowl winner.

Stupid gump is stupid gump.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

When you post responses more than anyone else in the thread, it's hard to use the "I was just trolling" line. You seem to miss the point of trolling.

Read it again...

But it is funny that the same polling organization that awarded the Tide the '41 title was the same one that awarded LSU the 2011 title over Alabama.

If you don't see the humor in that, you're taking it all too seriously.



quote:

By the way, your link recognizes 2 national championships for auburn. Sort of undermines the whole thread, doesn't it?

I don't really care, again, I just think it's funny that the same organization that awarded Bama the '41 title awarded LSU the 2011 title.

It's just that it's taken about 100 posts for me to try to get people over their butt hurt to see the humor.

..well, AND I love to see Bama fans admit that the '41 title is bogus - and then try to defend it!



Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71296 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

I just think it's funny that the same organization that awarded Bama the '41 title awarded LSU the 2011 title.


I actually think it legitimizes Houlgate. LSU should claim 2011 for their own using the Houlgate rating system.

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

I actually think it legitimizes Houlgate. LSU should claim 2011 for their own using the Houlgate rating system.

Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:44 pm to
quote:



One team was ranked #19 with two losses and 3rd in the SEC.

The other was undefeated, untied, SEC champion and Sugar Bowl winner.

Stupid gump is stupid gump.


Which legitimate poll did 2004 auburn win?

Stupid sheep-screwing barner shithead.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Which legitimate poll did 2004 auburn win?

Houlgate!

Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

Which legitimate poll did 2004 auburn win?


Eufaula Golf Digest

Print the shirts.
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:39 pm to
Yes, and everyone would laugh at you.

Posted by WDE85
Member since Nov 2012
2161 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Yes, and everyone would laugh at you.
Please continue Bama fan! Hypocrisy's a bitch, ain't it?
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 2/15/13 at 6:25 am to
quote:

Please continue Bama fan! Hypocrisy's a bitch, ain't it?


Not so bad, really. I think being a little stepsister would be a real bitch. It has to get tiring trying to exaggerate yourself and tear down your rival in the vain hope of just being equal.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter