Started By
Message
re: Auburn continues to take more top kids from instate
Posted on 8/21/26 at 4:05 pm to parrothead
Posted on 8/21/26 at 4:05 pm to parrothead
quote:
did you get that from AI or do you have an actual link to that?
Go to the website for the Alabama Commission on Higher Education. They have loads of data in their portal.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 4:23 pm to AUTiger789
Yeah I’m sure my life is much better than yours. Go throw some toilet paper in a tree to make yourself feel better. You haven’t had much practice doing that the last couple of years.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 4:42 pm to dallasvoldfw
quote:
Yeah I’m sure my life is much better than yours. Go throw some toilet paper in a tree to make yourself feel better. You haven’t had much practice doing that the last couple of years.
You seem so happy.
Edit
quote:
Auburn University, located in the “Loveliest Village on the Plains,” is also home to the happiest students in the nation, according to The Princeton Review’s 2025 rankings released this week.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 4:51 pm to AUTiger789
What a weird comparison you are making here.
Do you think every kid from said school is equal or something? How do you even know if you are taking the top kids from these schools?
Likewise, do you think every kid from a non "top20" school is automatically dumb or something?
These are high school rankings, not an actual indication of what students you actually took in.
You aren't making a strong case for better education with these types of generalizations. They absolutely do not support the claim in your title.
Do you think every kid from said school is equal or something? How do you even know if you are taking the top kids from these schools?
Likewise, do you think every kid from a non "top20" school is automatically dumb or something?
These are high school rankings, not an actual indication of what students you actually took in.
You aren't making a strong case for better education with these types of generalizations. They absolutely do not support the claim in your title.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:06 pm to jangalang
Dude I live in Dallas, Texas. It’s a great place to live with a booming economy. The quality of life here is great. Excellent food, resturants, pro sports and one of the best airports in the world. I love it here.
After college most people get real jobs in real cities. I guess you probably don’t realize that at Cow College.
I’m so ready for football so we don’t have dumb threads started by idiots like the OP. You’re irrelevant in your own state. That really has to suck.
After college most people get real jobs in real cities. I guess you probably don’t realize that at Cow College.
I’m so ready for football so we don’t have dumb threads started by idiots like the OP. You’re irrelevant in your own state. That really has to suck.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:41 pm to Boom33
quote:
Do you think every kid from said school is equal or something? How do you even know if you are taking the top kids from these schools?
If you lived in Alabama you would know the difference in attracting a large majority of the kids from Vestavia Hills compared to a large majority of kids from Minor. Every year for 15+ years. I assure you there is a big difference.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:43 pm to dallasvoldfw
quote:
Dude I live in Dallas, Texas
You're very eat up to lead with this.
I like Dallas but where I live doesnt speak to my happiness.
quote:
You’re irrelevant in your own state. That really has to suck.
Newsflash: You are too.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:43 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
you would know the difference in attracting a large majority of the kids from Vestavia Hills compared to a large majority of kids from Minor.
I'm getting a vibe here ...

Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:46 pm to dallasvoldfw
quote:
I guess you probably don’t realize that at Cow College.
You’re irrelevant in your own state. That really has to suck.
You sound incredibly stable.
No one gives a shite that you live in Dallas. If you are a real person and not a bammer alter, you probably live in some shite suburb like Garland or Frisco and think that's somehow a flex. I promise you, you can't out quality of life me. But unlike you I have no desire to blast my personal credentials on the internet to some bitter internet troll.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:02 pm to AUTiger789
We all know his quality of life aint jack shite
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:17 pm to cdur86
quote:
Auburn University alumni report a median annual income of $57,000 ten years after graduation, compared to $53,000 for alumni from the University of Alabama. [1]
Salary Breakdown
Auburn University: $57,000 median annual earnings 10 years post-enrollment.
University of Alabama: $53,000 median annual earnings 10 years post-enrollment. [1]
Career Strengths
Auburn: Strong alumni earnings and placement tend to focus heavily on engineering, business, and applied sciences.
Alabama: Graduates show competitive outcomes with traditional strengths in fields like law, communication, business, and health professions. [1]
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:18 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
If you lived in Alabama you would know the difference in attracting a large majority of the kids from Vestavia Hills compared to a large majority of kids from Minor. Every year for 15+ years. I assure you there is a big difference.
I'm from Alabama.
Although what I pointed out would be true in any state. Even now you just supported the fact it's a high school ranking, not an indication of what any college received.
You aren't attracting a large majority either. You mention Vestavia Hills which had 580 seniors (AI checked), and Auburn got 149 of those, which is roughly 25% of them. That's nowhere near a large majority.
And that score isn't based on the top, it's based on all. The worst student contributes to that top20 score the same amount as the top student. Again, it's a high school rank, not an indication of what you took in.
The top kids might have gone out of state to Ivy schools or some shite, who knows. It's not like there is some even distribution or anything.
It's a Fallacy of Division if you want to research it further.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:18 pm to cdur86
quote:
Auburn University alumni report a median annual income of $57,000 ten years after graduation, compared to $53,000 for alumni from the University of Alabama. [1]
Salary Breakdown
Auburn University: $57,000 median annual earnings 10 years post-enrollment.
University of Alabama: $53,000 median annual earnings 10 years post-enrollment. [1]
Career Strengths
Auburn: Strong alumni earnings and placement tend to focus heavily on engineering, business, and applied sciences.
Alabama: Graduates show competitive outcomes with traditional strengths in fields like law, communication, business, and health professions. [1]
quote:
Students at one Alabama college go on to make the most money, according to new federal data.
Auburn University students and graduates make about $2,000 more annually than people who studied at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, and about $4,000 more than those at Samford, according to the latest version of the U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:21 pm to Boom33
quote:
Auburn got 149 of those, which is roughly 25% of them. That's nowhere near a large majority.
I'm talking about a majority of those who chose Auburn or Alabama. Auburn took 149 students from VH and Bama took 90. That's quite a difference. Now think of that type of difference over 15 consecutive years. That's what we're talking about.
... now realize it's been about the same thing for Homewood, Spain Park, Oak Mountain, etc. and it's been happening for 15+ years.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:23 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
I'm talking about a majority of those who chose Auburn or Alabama. Auburn took 149 students from VH and Bama took 90. That's quite a difference. Now think of that type of difference over 15 consecutive years. That's what we're talking about.
... now realize it's been about the same thing for Homewood, Spain Park, Oak Mountain, etc. and it's been happening for 15+ years.
Again, that says nothing about the actual quality of the students individually.
If you can't understand your fallacy, then you aren't doing Auburn any favors in the "better education" category.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:34 pm to Boom33
quote:
The top kids might have gone out of state to Ivy schools or some shite, who knows. It's not like there is some even distribution or anything.
Right. But in a school like VH, there's probably 550 or so kids in a graduating class. You've got about 50 kids who go to Ivy Leagues, Vandy, etc.... schools definitively more prestigious than what an instate school can offer. You've also got about 30% of kids who either don't have the grades to go to Auburn or maybe Bama.
I know for a fact there are countless kids from OTM schools to end up at Bama because they didn't get accepted to Auburn... but we'll just leave that there.
Auburn and Bama are primarily taking kids who are between the 30th and the 90th percentiles at a school like VH... so the average of these is likely going to be somewhere around the 60th percentile type of kid. That's likely a kid with a 28 ACT and a 3.8ish GPA. The more of these types of instate kids you can add, the better. And Auburn is taking 40-50% more kids from these schools each year compared to the other school across the state.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 7:33 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
I know for a fact there are countless kids from OTM schools to end up at Bama because they didn't get accepted to Auburn... but we'll just leave that there.
I know plenty of Auburn grads who have students in Tuscaloosa because they got more scholarship money…..but we’ll just leave that there. Some even posted it in a recent thread about school rankings.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:00 pm to parrothead
quote:
I know plenty of Auburn grads who have students in Tuscaloosa because they got more scholarship money
Absolutely. Like I said, Bama pays the better applicants to come, and Auburn mostly makes those same high profile applicants pay full price. There's enough demand for Auburn to be able to do that.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:24 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
Absolutely. Like I said, Bama pays the better applicants to come, and Auburn mostly makes those same high profile applicants pay full price. There's enough demand for Auburn to be able to do that.
I don’t think this is the flex you think it is. Sounds like you’re poor if anything.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:33 pm to parrothead
The academics are close enough.
Tie breaker goes to the school that has played in a bowl game since mask mandates were a thing.
Tie breaker goes to the school that has played in a bowl game since mask mandates were a thing.
Popular
Back to top


0






