Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:30 pm to ColoBama
I’d say LSU as well.
You also have to factor losing seasons amongst the great seasons as well and LSU has been consistently winning on avg about 9 games a year while AU has had a few losing seasons where they shat the bed with a 3 win and a 5 win season along with some 7’s and 8’s. LSU has been more consistent, 2 Natty’s, more bowl wins and head to heads.
You also have to factor losing seasons amongst the great seasons as well and LSU has been consistently winning on avg about 9 games a year while AU has had a few losing seasons where they shat the bed with a 3 win and a 5 win season along with some 7’s and 8’s. LSU has been more consistent, 2 Natty’s, more bowl wins and head to heads.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:36 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Not every year. In ‘11 and ‘15 we kicked the shite out of y’all.
Sans a few years here and there, they have all been dramatic for the most part, since 2000. Hell even Auburns bad year in 2012, the game was intense to the end
In ‘14 Auburn raped LSU.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:39 pm to 14caratgoldjones
Overall Record from 2000-present
LSU 177-56 (.760)
Auburn 158-75 (.678)
SEC Record from 2000-present
LSU 100-44 (.694)
Auburn 89-55 (.625)
LSU 177-56 (.760)
Auburn 158-75 (.678)
SEC Record from 2000-present
LSU 100-44 (.694)
Auburn 89-55 (.625)
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:41 pm to AU24
L7U now but they are on a big decline as of now... may never recover.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:43 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
L7U now but they are on a big decline as of now... may never recover.
compared to Auburn? LSU finished 9-4 last year and Auburn finished 10-4. They have some work to do to make up the 23 game lead LSU has on Auburn since 2000. That or winning another national title. Auburn's MO lately has been to have a few 7-8 win seasons bordered by a 10 win season. They haven't had b2b 10 win seasons since the 80s
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:51 pm to AU24
While I might agree that Auburn could/should have played for the NC in 2004, you cannot claim or argue a NC when you didn't play in the recognized NC game. While the winner got stripped, we have no way of knowing how the game would have ended if you had been there in USC's place. So, no, you can't claim the 2004 NC.
It would appear as if LSU wins almost every other category that really matters. (H2H, Bowl, Bowl wins, NC, Conference Championships, SEC West Championships) LSU has had a better run since 2000. But Auburn's run has been very impressive, too.
It would appear as if LSU wins almost every other category that really matters. (H2H, Bowl, Bowl wins, NC, Conference Championships, SEC West Championships) LSU has had a better run since 2000. But Auburn's run has been very impressive, too.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:51 pm to AU24
Those numbers favor LSU but I would rather be in Auburn's position right now. LSU hasn't really been relevant recently (no matter their record to Auburn). They are viewed as a 15-20 range program on their way down.
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:55 pm to TigerPaw1
Add a winless in SEC category as well.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:57 pm to AU24
2 undefeated seasons and 1 heisman winner doesn’t come close to offsetting a difference in National Championships
Also does LSU have any losing seasons since 2000? Auburn has 2 including what was possibly the worst team ever fielded by a
big-6 member
Also does LSU have any losing seasons since 2000? Auburn has 2 including what was possibly the worst team ever fielded by a
big-6 member
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:00 pm to Rabern57
quote:
LSU hasn't really been relevant recently (no matter their record to Auburn).
how relevant has Auburn really been lately comparatively speaking? 10-4 last year, won the west, but the three years prior they were 8-5, 7-6, 8-5. Unless we're going to compare the programs in yearly intervals, I don't see how you could say Auburn has been all that relevant either. We'll see how both schools do this year, but Auburn has been as bi-polar a program as any for awhile now.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:02 pm to Glorious
quote:
Also does LSU have any losing seasons since 2000? Auburn has 2 including what was possibly the worst team ever fielded by a
big-6 member
LSU hasn't won fewer than 8 games in a season since 2000.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:22 pm to AU24
LSU probably.
Fewer disastrous seasons.
Fewer disastrous seasons.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:27 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:This.
LSU, but going forward who knows
O vs Gus. . .
Who the hell wants to call that?
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:30 pm to AU24
LSU for sure, but it ain't the margin that a lot of the LSU fans like to think.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:36 pm to beatbammer
quote:
LSU for sure, but it ain't the margin that a lot of the LSU fans like to think.
I can agree with this. Auburn had had a nice run since 2000. Some very good years.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:43 pm to AU24
O may have us just quit football...so you may not catch up
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:47 pm to 7nette
quote:
Add a winless in SEC category as well.
Yes, why was this not included?
Posted on 4/24/18 at 4:53 pm to AU24
I mean...today, looking at your post, I’m not sure how this is a discussion? Obviously LSU.
Going forward, we have Eddie O at HC. So frick
Going forward, we have Eddie O at HC. So frick
Posted on 4/24/18 at 5:49 pm to DBU
Not sure why this is a question? Unless you just wanted to see who the dumb people were.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News