Started By
Message
re: AU scout board reporting MSU under investigation for Newton recruitment
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:38 pm to BulldawgBooster
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:38 pm to BulldawgBooster
Bond and company did not bite. We know this from Cecil, but as I said earlier they do not represent MSU. Cecil and MSU could have had some dealings as well that did not go through. I think thats what the NCAA is more concerned with.. not bond and his friends. 

Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:39 pm to BulldawgBooster
quote:
Let me get you my next door neighbors phone number then. The fricker thinks Pat was innocent.
oh, well if thats the case, then yes, most of us do believe he was innocent then. Way to use your representative heuristics

Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:40 pm to AUtigR24
quote:
Bond and company did not bite. We know this from Cecil, but as I said earlier they do not represent MSU. Cecil and MSU could have had some dealings as well that did not go through. I think thats what the NCAA is more concerned with.. not bond and his friends.
Yeah, it's almost ALWAYS the University that pays for players. The booster paying for a player is such a thing of the past.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:41 pm to Slippery Slope
Probation is forthcoming
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:42 pm to AUtigR24
quote:
Bond and company did not bite. We know this from Cecil, but as I said earlier they do not represent MSU. Cecil and MSU could have had some dealings as well that did not go through. I think thats what the NCAA is more concerned with.. not bond and his friends.
looks like my post is changing auburn posters minds about what's going on here. Make up your minds guys. Maybe y'all will shut up and just sit back for a bit now.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:43 pm to Tds & Beer
What has your post changed?
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:46 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Do you want the NCAA investigating Bond and Co. or MSU. You pick. You can't have both if you do your fricked. That means they were working together.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:51 pm to AUtigR24
quote:
Do you want the NCAA investigating Bond and Co. or MSU. You pick. You can't have both if you do your fricked. That means they were working together.
Well as a general RULE when you start to try and find the truth, you ask questions of the one that came to you about it so that you can prepare to ask the questions of the other party. Got Kids?? Same thing. My girl says "DAD.. he came in my room and took my book and hit me with it!" I don't just get up and go to my son! I get details from her.. THEN go to him.. Ask him what happened.. See what lines up and what does not. Then go back to her and try to get a clearer picture. Then go back to him and deal with it!
It's the way it is!
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:52 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
Itsme2011
while that normally works, you forgot that this is the Cam Newton investigation. Logical fact finding isn't required.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:55 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:said...
Tds & Beer
quote:
One person acted as an agent. That person had not been associated with the university for over a decade.
Um...about 1 week before the whole Cam story broke, you posted that you personally overheard or were in a conversation with 2 slightly drunk State boosters who said they OFFERED $80,000 FOR CAM NEWTON BUT THEY GOT OUTBID BY AUBURN. You were standing by your story at the time...I remember this specifically because I RA'd your post because I was certain you had made it up...then a week later, I was just as certain that you had not made it up. I hope you did, because the part where state was outbid by AU worries me....either way, it makes your above statement pretty fricking curious
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:55 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
What kind of scared me for yall, was a lot of the stuff in the Calloway shite thats going on, sounded very similar to some of the stuff that Bama was punished for in that rulling.
Thanks for your concern, but if anything in the present looks like cheating from the past it has to be the P4P that is allegedly still going on at auburn.
Not only has it happened in the past, those that were in control of are still running the show.
Chizit is just the puppet. Dye, Lowder, Rains and Chett Williams ministry of money are still very much involved with the auburn program.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:56 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
while that normally works, you forgot that this is the Cam Newton investigation. Logical fact finding isn't required.
See, I disagree somewhat. You have to follow a process in order to be somewhat fair. Second, I don't believe this is JUST about AU, and that's a personal opinion.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 4:59 pm to Itsme2011
SO who's gonna get in trouble and who isn't? Serious question...
Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:00 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
See, I disagree somewhat. You have to follow a process in order to be somewhat fair
i think you missed what I was saying. I was agreeing with the process. I was taking a jab at everyone who drew conclusions based on if X asked A for something, then X and B definitely talked and benefits were given even though nothing could be found.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:03 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
SO who's gonna get in trouble and who isn't? Serious question...
Ole Miss is going to get in trouble because the media believes Ole Miss and MSU are the same. Then, after watching TV, the NCAA will start investigating the P4P allegations against Ole Miss and you all will get the death penalty.
Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:04 pm to Slippery Slope
My, it is indeed a "Slippery Slope" then, isn't it?
Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:07 pm to tkane311
quote:hey no holding posters to past statements it is sometimes difficult keeping a story straight...
tkane311

Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:07 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
That is a fair question. While I don't think so, I think it is poor judgement on MSU unless there was actually a set up (WHICH I HAVE NOT HEARD OF!) and don't believe
Mullen continued to recruit Cam- and no longer dealt with his Dad. Cam was of legal age I think and did not need his Father's signature to sign with anyone.
And since Cam didnt know right- this should be ok?
Posted on 4/19/11 at 5:11 pm to BulldawgBooster
quote:
And cue NYCAuburn
Did I make up an conspiracies or say anything like that? No, I questioned your hearing the tapes story. Ask almost anybody on here and they will tell you I am reasonable. Your story seemed far fetched as you told it and added to it as the thread progressed which made it less believable. At first you did not know if it was a voicemail, which doesn't seem that hard if you actually heard it. Then it was a voicemail. Then if I recall correctly the tapes were played at a party. Why are there not more people with this story for all to hear. Your story sucked brah move along and forget you told it.
This post was edited on 4/19/11 at 5:14 pm
Back to top
