Started By
Message

re: AU RB Jarquez Hunter+others suspended for filming & distributing sex acts without consent

Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:45 am to
Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
8089 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

"OK the videos may be real but...."


I don’t think anyone questioned them being real. If so, that’s dumb. It does look like the person that exposed the videos was after some kind of vengeance. I don’t believe the people in the videos/pictures were the ones that came forth. But they might not have known videos of them were being shared. An investigation has to be done in this case.

I hope the identities of the females are not revealed. And I think the faces were not revealed in the videos.
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
13898 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Don’t think we need to call her a bitch for wanting some BBC.


I didn't call her a bitch for wanting BBC. I called her a bitch for being a skank arse slut.
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18436 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Did Jarquez help make any videos without consent from other parties?

Did Jarquez share any of these videos without consent from others?



Not illegal to do either of those... No one will care, but lets look at the law... (HE SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR BEING AN IDIOT)

Lets look at the actual law. (The person posting on Twitter could be in legal trouble because they were harassing Jarquez.

LINK (Revenge Porn Law)

The defendant is charged with distributing a private image.


A person commits the crime of distributing a private image if he/she knowingly posts, emails, texts, transmits, or otherwise distributes a private image with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted when the depicted person has not consented to the transmission and the depicted person has a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image.



To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) The defendant posted, emailed, texted, transmitted, or otherwise distributed a private image of [insert name of person depicted];
(2) The defendant did so with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted;
(3) The depicted person had not consented to the transmission of the private image;
(4) The depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image; (AND)
(5) The defendant did so knowingly.

So, the girl in the video could sue multiple folks for a privacy violation, but not criminal.
This post was edited on 5/19/23 at 8:48 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11158 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I didn't call her a bitch for wanting BBC. I called her a bitch for being a skank arse slut.


Fair.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53601 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:46 am to
He will be reinstated half time of game one
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50407 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Please, please let this be true. Please.


Tuscaloosa is a man of the people!








Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
28860 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

The more publicity it gets the more likely he will have to

So you're saying Tuscaloosa is, in fact, doing work?

Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50407 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Not illegal to do either of those... No one will care, but lets look at the law...


What is the law on voyeurism? Because there were multiple pictures disseminated of his male teammates in the shower, and at least one sex video was taken from behind a door.
This post was edited on 5/19/23 at 8:51 am
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53601 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:52 am to
Holy shite. Go look at his Twitter. Guy is a nut case
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
13898 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Not illegal to do either of those... No one will care, but lets look at the law...


Does this mean in Alabama that I can put a camera up in the bathroom at my house and film guests?
This post was edited on 5/19/23 at 8:54 am
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50407 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Holy shite. Go look at his Twitter. Guy is a nut case


Brian Stultz? Nah, he’s a writer for Rivals. Seems like an okay dude to me.
Posted by Beachbum87
Niceville, FL
Member since Oct 2022
4175 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Does this mean in Alabama that I can put a camera up in the bathroom at my house and film guests?


That is still illegal.
Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
28860 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Holy shite. Go look at his Twitter. Guy is a future Pulitzer Prize winner in online journalism.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50407 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:07 am to
Thank you, internet legend paperwasp. You will be the first person I invite on my podcast.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
28443 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Thank you, internet legend paperwasp. You will be the first person I invite on my podcast.


Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50407 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:15 am to
Don’t you do that! This is the very thread you called me out for being afraid of Hugh Freeze.

I’ve got a brand to protect, sir.
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
13898 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:


That is still illegal.



So what's the difference with putting up a camera in the bathroom versus filming someone without their consent while they're getting banged from behind?
This post was edited on 5/19/23 at 9:20 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108241 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:20 am to
I reported Tuscaloosa to Federal Aviation Administration this morning. I don’t think it’s safe he flies the skies for public.
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
3118 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Not illegal to do either of those... No one will care, but lets look at the law... (HE SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR BEING AN IDIOT)
Eh... filming someone in a public place without consent is one thing, putting a hidden camera in your bedroom or place of work and creating nonconsensual pornography is another matter.

Not a lawyer, but from a legal perspective could this not also bring into play Criminal Surveillance and Dissemination of Obscene Material?

Beyond that, Title IX doesn't require a crime to be committed.

And beyond both of those, a civil case doesn't require a crime to be committed or a Title IX investigation.

We'll see how this all shakes out.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108241 posts
Posted on 5/19/23 at 9:24 am to
Is a cell phone video he had in his hand really a concealed video? Seems extremely hard for her to prove she didn’t know it was being filmed
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter