Started By
Message

re: Athletic Article on 8 vs 9 games and ESPN not paying

Posted on 5/3/23 at 11:07 pm to
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
25726 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

guarantee neither Kramer nor Slive would have left themselves with no leverage. Kramer was too powerful and Slive was too smart to let that happen.
Posted by WhereisAtlanta
Member since Jun 2016
847 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Interesting, so the SEC pushed through this expansion that most fans don't even want based on a promise of more money, and now, according to this, the TV overlords aren't even going to pay up other than the pro-rata share which means existing teams get the same amount.

Ridiculous. Can we send Texas and Oklahoma back?


The SEC actually has a bit of leverage, if ESPN does not want to play along make a schedule with no iron bowl, wlocp, tsio, egg bowl, LSU vs A,&M etc, give them weeks with no good matchups and they will step in line.

We own the game they own the right to televise, simply feed them shite sandwiches till they cave.
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6251 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 5:06 am to
quote:

Don’t think it works like this. Once they are designated SEC, ESPN owns their media rights. They will increase the contract pro rata, just not pay a premium for higher visibility.


Doesn't work like that. When the deal was signed they weren't part of the deal.
They deal was 14 teams when the contract was signed. TX and OU is added benefit. If the SEC decides the need more money because of the deal because of added value then it's up ESPn to provide the money.
Otherwise couple options for the SEC. Void the contract or sue ESPN and they will win.
Don't show any OU or TX sports on ESPN.
Or demand a restructure of the deal.
Posted by Marty Dawg
Ball Ground
Member since Oct 2020
1249 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 5:25 am to
quote:

There is actually a lot to like about this schedule


The only thing anyone should like about this "schedule" is the fact that it isn't real
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9694 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 8:46 am to
If we aren’t getting any more money for putting up with Texas and Oklahoma then send them back.
Posted by WhereisAtlanta
Member since Jun 2016
847 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 11:38 am to
Simply offer all TX and OU home games to the highest bidder
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
14147 posts
Posted on 5/4/23 at 12:06 pm to
The whole point in adding OU and Texass to the SEC was so each of us could get more revenue. But ESPN/ABC/Disney does NOT have to pay us more money (per school) after UTX and OU are added in.

I would fire Sankey just for this reason. He is a moron to have gotten the SEC into this situation. The Big 10 schools will get $80 million each and all we are getting is $58 million each.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter