Started By
Message

re: Almost 2 years in and Missouri still does not feel like it is part of Conference

Posted on 8/10/13 at 10:00 am to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 10:00 am to
Al Bundy with his usual and predictably non-original retort.

to the common man, Al.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Seriously? The Kentucky side of the state line is Cincinnati suburbs. It's not that hard to understand. Most of the people that live there work in Cincinnati. All that separates them is a bridge.


Counties across from Cincy - KY has like 120 counties so they are smaller than most
Boone County KY = 118,811
Kenton County KY = 159,720
Campbell County KY = 90,336
Gallatin County KY = 8,589
Grant County KY = 24,662
Pendleton County KY = 14,877
Bracken County KY = 8,488
Total = ~ 425 K

Golden Triangle = Cincinnati / Louisville / Lexington and most of the population lives in this triangle. Folks may live several counties away but work in one of these 3 cities. It is only about an hour from Lexington to Louisville and about 1.5 hours from Lexington to Cincinnati (with that 1/2 hour being the time to drive the 5 miles before and after the bridge).

ps, the Cincinnati International Airport is actually in Kentucky as is the Aquarium for the Cincinnati area. UK has played in Paul Brown (Bengals Stadium) and Bengals training camp was in Georgetown just outside of Lexington. UK basketball used to play a "home" game in Cincinnati and Louisville every year during the regular season.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Slive jumped the gun on this one. No reason to have them in the conference. We already can nationally recruit because we're the minor leagues of the NFL, so I don't see what the St.Louis/Kansas City TV markets really do for you. They will improve because no one can stand being embarrassed like they were last year. (Was shocked when I was reminded that they could have gone to the 2007 BCSNC if not for a loss against Oklahoma in the final week of the season). Competition does inherently make you better, they'll come around, but I don't see why we had to be the ones to raise them up just for symmetry's sake (even number of teams).


Reasons this may not be correct :

a) KC and STL are big markets, time will tell if SEC can get them
b) ACC schools were safe : Slive is UVA and Skipper is UNC
c) ACC + SEC = ESPN and FOX / BTN was not getting VA / GA / SC / NC / FL schools (no matter what their idiot bloggers think)
d) SEC was not adding second school states (FL, KY, GA, and SC)
e) Adding Mizzou blocks B1G moves at state of Texas
f) Adding Mizzou blocks B1G from adding MU + KU (Came out in Gee FOIA)
g) SEC was never adding West Virginia no matter what the "dude" said
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:34 am to
Didn't they officially join in July 2012? 13 is almost 24? Do cajuns have the same numbering system as the rest of us? Or is coonass education ridiculously subpar?
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Sig

I respectfully disagree with just about everything in your post.
quote:

quote:
Hell, their first choice was the Big 10 and only came to us after getting rejected.

True... This is the biggest factor to me. Mizzou is a great school and has done well in the big 12. I still don't believe they wanted in the SEC first.

When the B1G announced they were expanding, yes, we were interested. We wanted to get away from Texas. The deal was as good as done - the coaches had been told they'd be playing in the B1G in 2011 - but then came the kicker. It was a "junior" membership without equal payout for a graduated number of years. That would have hurt us financially. We took a step back, and Nebraska jumped on it because 1)they could afford it; and 2)they also wanted to get away from bevo. At the time, there was no indication at all that the SEC was considering expansion, and we had no reason to think an SEC membership was even possible.

The SEC was NEVER a second choice - that's BS. We considered a move to a conference that was expanding, and the SEC wasn't at that time. The infamous article about the SEC being "what's left" was written by a local AP stringer. The guy was a J-school grad, and used to do some adjunct work there, but the J-school had recently cut ties with him. He had an axe to grind. He is also neighbors with a lower-level, academic-side university administrator who would not have been involved in any of the conference discussions and had no authority to speak on the topic - I'd bet that was his "source" that spoke on the condition of anonymity. The SEC was never a second choice, they just waited a year to expand.

quote:

They are so midwestern, they'd fit right in with the Wisconsin and Ohio States.

That is just more BS. Those programs and states consider us redneck southerners! We're more southern than we are anything else. That argument is just dumb anyway. Is Florida really a "traditional southern" state? Or Kentucky? Come on.

quote:

Mizzou is a great school and has done well in the big 12

The only part of your post I agree with. Yes, Mizzou is a great school, and yes, we did well in the Big 12 - which was based on the Big 8 and the Big 6, and that was our conference initially. But that conference is gone now. I think we fit better in the SEC than any other conference out there.
This post was edited on 8/10/13 at 11:56 am
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

cant read it all but i will offer this for thought, mizzou was at least as respected if not feared,in the bIG 12 as a&m. recruiting over the last 2-3 years has been the difference but mizzou is every bit the program that a&m is.


Thank you. People don't understand how a QB can affect a team. Put Johnny on Mizzou, I'm sure Mizzou would also wreck shite.

Mizzou use to be good when they had GOOD QB's that also went in the NFL draft. Not much you can do with a QB coming off a MCL injury and playing at 75-80%, even missed games because of it.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Some parts of Kentucky are very southern and some parts are not. Kentucky is a strange state.


If Kentucky is not all southern then what are they? I definitely don't think of KY as a midwestern state. When I think of KY I think of the South. Hell the damn name KENTUCKY sounds southern.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

If Kentucky is not all southern then what are they?


UK is in Lexington which is very southern due to their early agricultural roots. Like the rest of the south it had a very high black population until the auto business grew at the turn of the last century. Many folks migrated in this time as the jobs paid better. Early settlers were generally Scots Irish who settled in the area because the water was good for making bourbon whiskey and it was not subject to the taxes of the early colonies. This is why making moonshine is still occurring in the eastern part of the state.

The cities of Louisville and Cincinnati were river towns that grew based on shipping up and down the river. Both have more Germans, English, Italians, Irish, and many of the cultures who emigrated to the USA after the Civil War and passed through Ellis Island looking for a better life in America. Both also were more manufacturing centers then agricultural centers so they are unlike most of the rest of the state which spent most of the early history of the state in agricultural.




quote:

Hell the damn name KENTUCKY sounds southern.


The name is Indian as entire state was basically sacred burial grounds of the tribes from what became the surrounding states. The name itself means "The Dark and Bloody Ground"and was pronounced kain tuh kee tho spelled Kentucky.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Is Florida really a "traditional southern" state? Or Kentucky?


Northern Florida was traditional southern but it was not widely settled past the most northern 1/3 of the state. It was not until Henry Flagler (Harkness, Flagler, and Rockerfeller) and his partners would make their fortunes in Standard Oil (now Exxon Mobie et al) and Henry would spend the remaining part of his life giving away his immense fortune. He was the one that built the railroad from the northern part of Florida all the way to the Keys which opened up the southern part of the state for settlement. South Florida was not settled till the past century and is much newer than the rest of the state. This causes the paradox that north Florida is southern while south Florida is northern.

As for KY see post above.



On the issue of Mizzou in the B1G or SEC my feeling is money had a part in the decision making. Nebraska originally had to "buy in" to the B1G at the rate of 5 million for 10 years until they got a full share as the existing schools were getting. It cost Mizzou 50 dollars to join the SEC and they were (along with TAMU) accorded a full share from day 1. Part of the appeal of the SEC is the minimal buy in, equal share from date of entry, and no exit fee that shows just how strong the conference is as a whole. Every other team that has joined the Big 5 will have at least several years before they are accorded a full share.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

my feeling is money had a part in the decision making.

Money definitely had a part in it. When the junior membership financial arrangement entered into the discussion, that was a deal killer for Mizzou.

Our fans love the SEC, and are glad we made the move. No question there.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 2:13 pm to
Great post.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Great post.


On a side note UK was originally a private school (spit from Transylvania which still exists) that used the Morrill Act to become an A&M school. As Auburn and Kentucky both wanted to develop a strong vet school at a time when money was tight and competing schools would suffer excess capacity a deal was made for UK not to build but be accorded so many slots in the Auburn program. I am fairly sure this agreement is still in place to this very day.

Because of this early tie you will see families with strong connections to both over the past generations.
Posted by outlawjoseywales
Memphis, TN
Member since Sep 2012
1836 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 2:48 pm to
If the Rams do leave in 2015 for LA or wherever that would be the best thing for the University of Missouri.

A lot of money would be going West on Saturday's to watch the minor leagues of the NFL, the SEC.

I am a Rams fan but that would help with sellouts and the demand for tickets. That is what Missouri needs is a strong demand for tickets by the fans.

And a new coaching staff.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42695 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 3:04 pm to
quote:


The name is Indian as entire state was basically sacred burial grounds of the tribes from what became the surrounding states. The name itself means "The Dark and Bloody Ground"and was pronounced kain tuh kee tho spelled Kentucky.


Whoa. I think you just solved a mystery. I heard all my life stories from relatives in KY about how part of their town was built on an Indian burial ground and that it flooded because of it. Now the origin of that story makes sense.
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

semotruman


I like your posts. Well thought out and you make some good points.

quote:

Our fans love the SEC, and are glad we made the move. No question there


Maybe not all, Mizzoukills seems to hate everything about the SEC, but I get your point.

Y'all definitely had a rough initial season with injuries, and I don't know what happened in basketball, but I think Mizzou will eventually settle our around 4th (or maybe 3rd) in the east in football with occasional higher finishes. Basketball should eventually start to work its way to the top of the east. Your basketball team may do more than any other sport in helping to gain respect in the conference.

As I said before in this thread, I never had anything against Mizzou, but only time will tell if this move was the best for all parties. If the SEC network begins to sell well in the St. Louis and OKC markets then the entire discussion may end up being moot.
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Your basketball team may do more than any other sport in helping to gain respect in the conference.


It already did. Even in what was by our basketball standards a disappointing season, our mere presence in the league increased your number of NCAA tournament bids last year by 33%. Without us, a shitty SEC men's basketball conference last year would have been markedly shittier. You're welcome.
This post was edited on 8/10/13 at 4:43 pm
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

It already did.


Y'all have been to zero final fours...
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Y'all have been to zero final fours...


SEC Final Fours by current 14 member SEC
Kentucky : (15) and (8) National Championships
Arkansas : (6) with 2 as SEC and (1) National Championship as SEC
Florida : (4) and (2) National Championships
Louisiana State : (4) and (0) National Championships
Georgia : (1) and (0) National Championships
Mississippi State : (1) and (0) National Championships

8 Current SEC teams have never been to a Final Four



SEC appearances by current 14 member SEC
Kentucky = 52
Arkansas = 29
Missouri = 26 - 1 vacated
Louisiana State = 20
Alabama = 20
Tennessee = 19
Florida = 18 - 2 vacated
Vanderbilt = 13
Texas A&M = 12
Georgia = 11 - 2 vacated
Mississippi State = 10
Auburn = 8
South Carolina = 8
Ole Miss = 7

Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36529 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 5:28 pm to
I honestly forget about them all the time. I was naming all the SEC teams to a buddy an left them out.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 8/10/13 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

If the SEC network begins to sell well in the St. Louis and OKC markets then the entire discussion may end up being moot.

I think you mean KC and not OKC. (I doubt Mizzou has much of a draw in Oklahoma City.) And I think those areas will likely put it in the standard bundle or sports bundle and get it widely distributed.

And Killz is as happy as anyone with the move. He just enjoys being sarcastic and provoking.

quote:

I like your posts. Well thought out and you make some good points.

Thank you. Yes, women CAN converse intelligently about sports.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter