Started By
Message
Alabama Biased
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:32 pm
Every year the Alabama team declines under DeBoer the Biased and favoring gets higher and higher. I'm not saying Alabama is necessarily a bad team but they don't need to be in the top ten of most of these goofball analysts such as Phil Steele and Paul Finnebaum. It's just really annoying.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 3:34 pm
8
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:36 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
Holy shite dude why are you thinking about Alabama? They were a playoff team last year.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:40 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
This is bad and you should feel bad.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:44 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
Do I need to update this to fit your conspiracy?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:57 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
You LSU guys need to stop.
We don’t make post like this at UT-Austin.
We don’t make post like this at UT-Austin.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 3:59 pm to Liberace
quote:
Liberace
You a switch hitter?
Why the new logo?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:04 pm to Night Vision
I’m not sure I’m following you friend.
Hook ‘em.
Hook ‘em.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:05 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
How did Alabama decline each year under DeBoer? Year 1 under DeBoer they finished 9-4 and no playoffs. Year 2 they finished 11-4, played in the SECCG, made the playoffs, won a CFP game and lost to the eventual National Champions.
How is that declining each year?
How is that declining each year?
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:15 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
quote:
It's just really annoying
Try reading your post.
quote:
Biased
Why is this capitalized? Or is DeBoer the Biased your own nickname for KDB ?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 4:20 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
quote:
Every year the Alabama team declines under DeBoer the Biased and favoring gets higher and higher. I'm not saying Alabama is necessarily a bad team but they don't need to be in the top ten of most of these goofball analysts such as Phil Steele and Paul Finnebaum. It's just really annoying.
Helen Keller could see there's been a drop off since Saban left. Hell, right before Saban left, there started to be a dropoff. But, you're holding current Alabama to Saban's prime years "Alabama" and that's stupid. Two of DeBoer's losses last season came in post season play. So yes, he's lost four games in his first two years. But, two of the four losses this past season was in the conference championship game and the other in the second round of the playoffs. So you're wanting analysts to look at a team that literally was in the playoffs last season (and their conference championship game) with a roster full of talent coming back as "out of the top ten"? Why?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 5:34 pm to Bayou_Bengal44
quote:
Alabama Biased
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News