Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/17/19 at 7:56 pm to Tillman
If Alabama lost by 30 to an unranked team, I'd be the first to say they don't belong in the playoffs.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 7:56 pm to ItchyandScratchy
quote:
I'm great man, 5 National Titles in 10 years makes me sleep soundly
You don’t have shitt grasshopper. Wearing a bama T-shirt that you purchased at wal mart doesn’t entitle you to anything. You have never won anything. Delusional idiot.
How old are you 12? ETA to add:
@ your delusions of grandeur.This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 7:57 pm to Tractor Tug60
I'm a fan of a team, just like you. Dummy.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 7:59 pm to ItchyandScratchy
Point went right over your ignorant head.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:00 pm to Funky Tide 8
why do you make hostile comments on the internet like an anti-social person
u bitter af
u bitter af
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:00 pm to Tillman
That game was a pick 'em but I got a Bama fan to give me 7 points and ND for a century.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:01 pm to Tillman
Naw, he’s just an ignorant kid.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:02 pm to sand mountainDvalues
Lol funny coming from a bunch of child molesters. Be safe out there in the swamps choir boys.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:05 pm to Tillman
quote:
why do you make hostile comments on the internet like an anti-social person
u bitter af
It was a simple question that you are getting extremely defensive about. What does that have to do with being social or not? Does communicating like an 8th grader make one "social?"
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:07 pm to Tractor Tug60
he's mad b/c Clemson may hold the 2-1 advantage over Saban's dynasty in natties forever, or it could get worse.
if Saban were to go 1-3 against Dabo in the natty, that will be a mark against him for GOAT.
if Saban were to go 1-3 against Dabo in the natty, that will be a mark against him for GOAT.
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:08 pm to tigahstar
i was at Clemson during the tommy west years homey. i been with clemson from the dark days to its current blueblood status.
unlike people on here, i can name players on ACC teams. lol
unlike people on here, i can name players on ACC teams. lol
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:11 pm to Tillman
quote:
he's mad b/c Clemson may hold the 2-1 advantage over Saban's dynasty in natties forever, or it could get worse.
Well, technically Bama was directly responsible for Clemson ever getting close to competing for one in 2017.
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:11 pm to Funky Tide 8
that was a rebuilding year. lost most of the offense from the title team.
still won the regular season though lol
if Watson had come back for 4th year, that's an easy win.
still won the regular season though lol
if Watson had come back for 4th year, that's an easy win.
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:17 pm to Tillman
quote:
that was a rebuilding year. lost most of the offense from the title team.
Kind of like, um, 2018 was a rebuilding year for Bama on defense?
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:18 pm to Tillman
You know how I know you don't have a clue? Because Notre Dame is traditionally the most privileged program in the college football world.
According to the polls, Alabama won national titles in 1964 and 1965. In 1966 Alabama was 11&0, allowed only 44 points all season long, and thrashed Nebraska 34-7 in the Sugar Bowl. Only 5 teams scored on Alabama, including Nebraska, and none scored more than 14 points. LINK
Notre Dame didn't play bowl games back then, but during the season they played to a 10-10 tie with Michigan State and those 2 teams were awarded co national titles. I have read that was probably because the Northern media, which pretty much ruled the college football polls of that era, were dead set not to award The University of Alabama a 3rd straight national title, as that would have been unprecedented. So instead, they awarded the title to Michigan State and the traditional darling, Notre Dame.
That's just one example. Notre Dame has been favored by the college football press since at least the early 20th century. Only in relatively recent years has that somewhat changed.
And that's also just one more example that proves you are clueless.
edit to say, all that aside, your username honors a racist segregationist. LINK
According to the polls, Alabama won national titles in 1964 and 1965. In 1966 Alabama was 11&0, allowed only 44 points all season long, and thrashed Nebraska 34-7 in the Sugar Bowl. Only 5 teams scored on Alabama, including Nebraska, and none scored more than 14 points. LINK
Notre Dame didn't play bowl games back then, but during the season they played to a 10-10 tie with Michigan State and those 2 teams were awarded co national titles. I have read that was probably because the Northern media, which pretty much ruled the college football polls of that era, were dead set not to award The University of Alabama a 3rd straight national title, as that would have been unprecedented. So instead, they awarded the title to Michigan State and the traditional darling, Notre Dame.
That's just one example. Notre Dame has been favored by the college football press since at least the early 20th century. Only in relatively recent years has that somewhat changed.
And that's also just one more example that proves you are clueless.
edit to say, all that aside, your username honors a racist segregationist. LINK
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:20 pm to John Milner
I guarantee you he isn't whining about Notre Dame getting in the playoffs last season.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:21 pm to Tillman
quote:
if Watson had come back for 4th year, that's an easy win.
Please spare us
Spare us the talk of players coming back for their senior year. Bama has lost more talent early to the NFL than any program in the nation over the last 10 years. Further saying it would be easy with Watson if he came back, it wasn't easy when you had him
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:25 pm to genuineLSUtiger
I listen to finbaum for a while today while I was driving
Alabama radio network it should be called.
They’ve all resorted to constantly calling nick Saban greatest coach of all time... even Paul mentions it once a segment.
Coping mechanism for the fricking crybabies I assume.
Throw in fact all coaches are jumping off the ship they are like a bunch of squirming rats losing their mind.
Alabama radio network it should be called.
They’ve all resorted to constantly calling nick Saban greatest coach of all time... even Paul mentions it once a segment.
Coping mechanism for the fricking crybabies I assume.
Throw in fact all coaches are jumping off the ship they are like a bunch of squirming rats losing their mind.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 8:27 pm to p&g
quote:
all coaches are jumping off the ship they are like a bunch of squirming rats losing their mind.
whatever coaches are there will beat LSU yet again
8-0
21-0
29-0
that's a lot of 0s
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News