Started By
Message
re: Admin (s), please delete. Germans thread.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:20 pm to molsusports
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:20 pm to molsusports
quote:
conference championships and national championships are significant but their value is colored by which conference you played in and the circumstances under which you were awarded the national championship.
A national championship is a national championship. I highly doubt very many players who play on a championship team care how they got it after winning it.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:29 pm to RollTide1987
what does how players feel about it have to do with the best way to rank programs? seems like a non-sequitor
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:45 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
A national championship is a national championship.
So 1941 is the same as 2012?
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:43 pm to USMC Gators
quote:Considering the title of the thread is
A national championship is a national championship.
So 1941 is the same as 2012?
quote:I'd say yes, past national titles are relevant.
What's a good way to rank cfb programs historically
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:23 pm to USMC Gators
I really like your list and ranking criteria.
So it must be wrong.
So it must be wrong.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:24 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
So 1939 is the same as 2012?
FIFY
Back to top

2




