Started By
Message

re: Admin (s), please delete. Germans thread.

Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71315 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

conference championships and national championships are significant but their value is colored by which conference you played in and the circumstances under which you were awarded the national championship.


A national championship is a national championship. I highly doubt very many players who play on a championship team care how they got it after winning it.

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37581 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:29 pm to
what does how players feel about it have to do with the best way to rank programs? seems like a non-sequitor
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

A national championship is a national championship.

So 1941 is the same as 2012?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23664 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

A national championship is a national championship.

So 1941 is the same as 2012?
Considering the title of the thread is
quote:

What's a good way to rank cfb programs historically
I'd say yes, past national titles are relevant.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34964 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:23 pm to
I really like your list and ranking criteria.

So it must be wrong.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34964 posts
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

So 1939 is the same as 2012?


FIFY
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter