Started By
Message

A lot of the 1 loss teams in the top 10

Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:41 pm
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16514 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:41 pm
are hoping to get into the mix. But compare those and their "best" loss

OU lost to a bad UT team (yes I know they are playing good now)

Bama lost to a fairly good OM team

MSU lost to an average at best NU team

OSU lost to a good MSU team

UNC does not have a chance if they win but they lost to a bad SC team in the first game.

I am pretty sure the committee discusses this along with the SOS etc. Thoughts anyone
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Bama lost to a fairly good OM team

MSU lost to an average at best NU team


lollercoaster
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16514 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:45 pm to
explain thyself dudewhole
Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2463 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

MSU lost to an average at best NU team


Michigan state should have a single loss to Michigan. That Nebraska ending was bullshite.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

lollercoaster
Ole Miss at its best would pound Nebraska at its best. Tommy Armstrong is a joke
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
16985 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Bama lost to a fairly good OM team

MSU lost to an average at best NU team


That was being nice, NU is AWFUL!
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
16985 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
MSU lost to an average at best NU team


Michigan state should have a single loss to Michigan. That Nebraska ending was bull shite.


Totally Agree.
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16514 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:49 pm to
maybe so but either way it is a loss. MSU or Iowa wins they are in so it really does not matter. if MSU was undefeated but loses to Iowa they would not be in the final 4
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
21603 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:49 pm to
nvm, read that wrong. I thought you meant UT (Texas) was playing good right now.
This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 12:53 pm
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:51 pm to
I'd call OM and Nebraska a push. Don't think there's enough evidence on either side to say who is objectively better. Nebraska and OM both have silly losses.

Granted, OM has the far better win but that was more of a fluke and an indictment on Alabama.
This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 12:52 pm
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16514 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:51 pm to
Ut in kville is playing great, but UT in texassss is not
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I'd call OM and Nebraska a push.


Wut?
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:54 pm to
frick UT Austin
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I'd call OM and Nebraska a push. Don't think there's enough evidence on either side to say who is objectively better. Nebraska and OM both have silly losses.

Granted, OM has the far better win but that was more of a fluke and an indictment on Alabama.



This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2463 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

maybe so but either way it is a loss. MSU or Iowa wins they are in so it really does not matter. if MSU was undefeated but loses to Iowa they would not be in the final 4


I have a question

If Ole Miss didn't lose to Arkansas, What would happened? Does that mean Alabama still would of went to the playoffs or would they have tried to put Ole Miss in over them?

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79990 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

I'd call OM and Nebraska a push. Don't think there's enough evidence on either side to say who is objectively better. Nebraska and OM both have silly losses.


Are you retarded, high, or both?

How can you not say that a 9-3 team isn't objectively better than a 5-7 team?
Posted by Taurus 357
Great Lakes Gambler
Member since Dec 2014
3916 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:07 pm to
Nebraska has had a lot of close losses, but they've had twice as many losses as Ole Miss. And yes Turnover Tommy Armstrong would single handedly sink Nebraska's chance at victory. But the history shows that Ole Miss wouldn't blow them out. NU rarely gets blown out.
Posted by Bielema Dat
Jasper, Arkansas
Member since Sep 2015
101 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:13 pm to
'Bama would still be in because of their perception nationally. They have lost to inferior teams on their home field before and not paid any price, just like this season.
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21966 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:14 pm to
if unc wins, it will be a big bitch fest. can't wait.

go tarheels
Posted by OMapologist
Member since Oct 2015
594 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:14 pm to
Thoughts... The top 8 teams in the country should compete in a playoff for the national championship. AND you should be required to compete in a conference championship game to qualify for the playoff.

This 4 team setup is the biggest load of shite I've ever seen.

For instance, say Mich St beats Iowa... How on earth do you pick 1 of those teams to go in, but leave the other 2 out?

OR what if UNC beats Clemson? Who the heck should go in that scenario?

Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter