Started By
Message

re: How many years are we going to endure Luke ball?

Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:15 am to
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:15 am to
You reference UT. They've been making budget hires ever since Kiffin left. The fact that they let him go speaks volumes. UT is the perfect example of what not to do and how not to run a coaching search.

If someone comes in and gives us a 10 win season and leaves, that is a hell of a lot better than someone that comes in, destroys the program, doesn't recruit what we need, and fan support evaporates. I would rather a coach leave due to success than failure.

I still support Freeze. He wanted to win. That is the number one quality to hire a coach. Some say he was arrogant and too prideful. Those are great qualities of a HC. His ego was the perfect motivator. Hell, he would sell out his best friend to win and keep his name in good headlines. This is the only guy in the nation that outcoached Saban twice and is unemployed. WTF are we doing?
Posted by Blaeke
Member since Dec 2016
1019 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:50 am to
I will say that I believe Matt Luke to not be the type of coach to temper his expectations of the program. If he "loves Ole Miss" as much as he is described, then he would definitely want to try his best to elevate the program back to prominence and beyond.

However, is he capable at this juncture in his career to achieve this? And the bigger question, is he able to make the tough decisions and hold people accountable for their poor performance both on the field and recruiting?

It remains to be seen.

Posted by 256Rebel
Member since Dec 2017
402 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

However, is he capable at this juncture in his career to achieve this? And the bigger question, is he able to make the tough decisions and hold people accountable for their poor performance both on the field and recruiting?


Maybe it's the frustration and anger left over from the Bama game talking, but based on the evidence of 15 games and a full off-season, I would say the answer to both questions is an absolute NO! The man has displayed no indication of being able to make tough, much less intelligent, decisions (other than immediately saying yes to an undeserved $3 million dollar contract).
Posted by LuciusSulla
Oxford, MS
Member since Nov 2010
2703 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

It doesn't change the point that I was making.



It actually reinforces it. The AD over there finally gave up on testing each hire for traces of mystical Bear DNA, and the top guys on the list had nothing to do with Alabama previously.

There isn't that much to "get" at Ole Miss. The Grove is unique, but overall, the school is a lot like other pre-Civil War public universities - the ones that actually were then what they are now (my alma mater is an example of one that isn't). It dates back to a time when states viewed themselves as nations and their universities were there to promote the intellectual greatness of that nation. Here, there is a layer of old south myth-making on top of it, but the core identity of Ole Miss comes from something before the Civil War when it was the educational crown jewel of a nation-state.

You feel a variation of the same thing when you go to any of the older public universities, that connection to a different era. Antebellum universities exude that, and any coach that comes down here that Ole Miss treats right and wants to be here is going to pick up on it. It's an easy thing to get into as it is unique and distinct to a handful of universities in the world. It's a different experience being involved with one.

People should actually have little more respect for the university's capacity to win people over, I think. The irony to me is that Ole Miss is one of the few universities to which I've been that quickly makes outsiders want to be here, a fact much noted until we talk about coaches. When it comes to them, there remains a contingent that seems to think they must be from here to buy in.

I think if you paid a top notch staff to be here and told the boosters to leave them the hell alone when it comes to the recruiting and coaching, Ole Miss could land a good coach that would stay for quite awhile.
Posted by TSUNRebel
DeSoto County
Member since May 2014
560 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

If someone comes in and gives us a 10 win season and leaves, that is a hell of a lot better than someone that comes in, destroys the program, doesn't recruit what we need, and fan support evaporates. I would rather a coach leave due to success than failure.

I'm sorry, are you describing Hugh Freeze? He came in and won 10 games, doesn't recruit what we need and destroyed a program. So your biggest fear has already been achieved. Houston Nutt, Cutcliffe, and Tubberville. Coach O was the only coach that left the team better off than when he arrived and we gave up on him too soon. Trying to make a home run hire at head coach is a crap shoot that most often leaves fan bases wanting for more. I think there are some Ole Miss Rebels that should temper their expectations of what we can and will be able to hire vs what they believe we should be able to hire.
I loved the Hugh Freeze hire. I hated that he fricked things up so badly. He hired McGriff, so he also owns this years defense. Or you can blame it on Bjork. But you can't put all this on Luke. Let's see how the team bounces back. Let's see if the players respond to getting their asses kicked. The true measure of someone's character is shown under the tough times, not when things are going well.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:21 pm to
If you think that Tuberville left Ole Miss worse than found it, then you are crazy. To be honest, Freeze did too. We weren't 2-10 and winless for 2 years in the SEC, and 30 players in trouble academically, like what he inherited.
Posted by 256Rebel
Member since Dec 2017
402 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:41 pm to
Tuberville was a total shite in the way he departed Ole Miss, but he definitely left the program in better shape than when he arrived. He had to deal with the effects of the near-death penalty the FNCAA handed down.

Now you've gone and made me defend Tuberville.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68422 posts
Posted on 9/19/18 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

But you can't put all this on Luke.
A coach in his second year can't be held accountable? Are you kidding me?
Posted by gamemc
Member since Jan 2013
913 posts
Posted on 9/20/18 at 10:26 pm to
He was named interim and thrown straight into the fire last July, a month before the season started. He has been the coach for less than 14 months. I understand that’s 14 months too long for you but it is what it is and any open-minded person would just let this shite ride until we can actually play for something. We’ll be in better shape to hire a real coach and convince talent to come play for something aka Liberty bowl.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68422 posts
Posted on 9/21/18 at 10:07 am to
quote:

open-minded person would just let this shite ride until we can actually play for something.
So fire him at the end of this year then since the bowl ban will be over? I'm good with that
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/21/18 at 10:16 am to
What steps has Luke taken to improve the team? To me, it looks like he is riding on the back of Hugh's recruiting and hasn't done jack schitt to make things better or really change anything at all. He would be a great coach for an FCS team.
Posted by Blaeke
Member since Dec 2016
1019 posts
Posted on 9/21/18 at 10:28 am to
"Ayyyy ayyy lissen up! Ayyyyyy ayyy lissen up!"
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/21/18 at 11:53 am to
I refuse to watch The Season while Luke is HC. I think I would rather start a self mutilation fetish than subject myself to that.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68422 posts
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:30 pm to
Haven't watched The Season since Shea had his coming out party against A&M
Posted by TSUNRebel
DeSoto County
Member since May 2014
560 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 1:15 am to
quote:

What steps has Luke taken to improve the team?
1) He tried to get rid of McGriff at the end of last season. 2) He held the majority of the talent on the team. What would this season look like without AJ, DK and Lodge? What if Little, Sims, Patterson and Rawlings had left? 3) Luke and the staff have addressed the lb issues with recruiting. 4) He has saved Ole Miss from 10 seasons of losing football and placed the program in the best possible position under the circumstances.
The NCAA's goal was to put Ole Miss in football purgatory for the next 10 years. A two year bowl ban was going to be bad enough, but the mass exodus of talent was going to leave Ole Miss struggling to field a team with enough talent to win 1 game. A new head coach bringing in a bunch of Juco and freshmen was going to struggle for 3 or 4 years at the least. If you could find one that wanted to do a rebuild. If the right coaching hire becomes available he will have more momentum when he does come in and no bowl ban to recruit against.
Matt Luke is serving his purpose, he is keeping Ole Miss afloat. That's all he was supposed to do. Some of you are crying over HF, well he's why you have Matt Luke. He's why your school is on probation. I think Henry and Landmass are taking out their hate of HF on Matt Luke. Get some therapy you two, or maybe just grow up.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68422 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Some of you are crying over HF, well he's why you have Matt Luke.
No. Bjork being a pussy is why we have Luke as our coach.
quote:

I think Henry and Landmass are taking out their hate of HF on Matt Luke
I don't hate Freeze even a little bit. I would hire him back tomorrow if I had a say
Posted by Blaeke
Member since Dec 2016
1019 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 9:13 am to
I'll be interested to see how Hugh Freeze performs in his next HC job. Does his shortcomings follow him? Does the scandal affect his recruiting?
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Get some therapy you two, or maybe just grow up.


I'm a grown man TSUN. You probably haven't been alive long enough to see this merry-go-round operate. There's a whole other board of grown men that agree Luke was a terrible hire. A lot of what you said is flat out untrue. Luke hasn't recruited defense. He did not want to get rid of McGriff. He did not save us from losing and he hasn't put us in the best possible position. This is just nonsense.
Posted by TSUNRebel
DeSoto County
Member since May 2014
560 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 10:36 am to
You haven't read many of my post obviously. I'm an old Ole Miss fan. This is my 42nd trip on this Ole Miss merry go round. Steve Sloan didn't leave me believing we would ever have a chance of winning. And before I knew it BB had me believing we could, and then I was cussing him when we couldn't win more. I cussed him when he got us put on probation. I also attended his funeral. I loved Tommy Tuberville and cussed him when he left us for Fauburn. Cutcliffe was boring and should have won the west. Orgeron was fun and could recruit. If we had held on to him for one more year we probably would have had HF coaching the offense instead of the shite show that was Houston Nutt. I've spent the last 40 plus years of what ifs. What if Cooper Manning would have played and Peyton Manning had come to Ole Miss. What if Tuberville didn't leave us for Fauburn. What if Orgeron had punted and won that game against state. What if Hugh Freeze was Orgeron's offensive coordinator. Orgeron and HF would have owned the state of Mississippi in recruiting. What I do know after 42 years of Ole Miss football is this. If we aren't shooting ourselves in the foot, we get plenty of help from the SEC office. What I think is funny, is Tuberville seems to be hanging around quite a bit in Oxford lately. Maybe we hired him to consult with the defensive coaches?
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18035 posts
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:16 am to
I have no problem with any of that. But Luke was and is wrong wrong wrong. And I'm sorry but he hasn't done anything to make the situation better.

Did you see the attendance today? There's probably 15k at the game. Even as low as Nutt took us, this is the lowest attendance I have seen since the early 80s.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter