Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:34 pm to Stonehog
Hate speech
And in those two words you just made the OP's point. Any opinion you don't agree with you try to marginalize their POV by defining it as "hate speech". Remind me where Phil claimed he hated gays or they should be imprisoned/tortured for their choices???*
*Realize Stonetard is trolling and I took the bait.
**Don't care
And in those two words you just made the OP's point. Any opinion you don't agree with you try to marginalize their POV by defining it as "hate speech". Remind me where Phil claimed he hated gays or they should be imprisoned/tortured for their choices???*
*Realize Stonetard is trolling and I took the bait.
**Don't care
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:35 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
A study that hasn't even been published or reviewed and Antoine Dodson seems like some shoddy evidence.
hey the dude said he needed more than just two people so I gave him 140 + 1.
i in no way said that I didn't believe genes and how you are made can't push somebody towards homosexuality. I said the opposite that it absolutely could
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:37 pm to 3nOut
How do you explain all of the other species of animals where homosexuality is observed?
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:39 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
How do you explain all of the other species of animals where homosexuality is observed?
I think y'all are asking me to argue for what I don't believe.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:39 pm to Stonehog
quote:
If you're giving all you have to the poor as Jesus instructs, you can't accumulate wealth.
If you're referring to the rich young ruler, you're missing the point and taking the passage out of context to suit your argument.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:43 pm to sorantable
Do we really need to post more examples of rich = bad? I've already used about a dozen and cas4t has used some too.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:44 pm to 3nOut
So you don't believe scientists have observed homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom?
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:46 pm to sorantable
quote:
If you're referring to the rich young ruler, you're missing the point and taking the passage out of context to suit your argument.
Let's be frank here, depending on the sect you belong to it's all about the context and interpretation of the Bible. I know very few who follow it literally. So isn't it a bit hypocritical to call someone out for the interpretation of what the Bible says when this is what majority of people do?
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:46 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
So you don't believe scientists have observed homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom?
of course i do. don't be purposefully obtuse.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:47 pm to stat19
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:48 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Do we really need to post more examples of rich = bad? I've already used about a dozen and cas4t has used some too.
Please, by all means, keep spinning and not responding when I and others point out the obvious fallacies in your logic.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:51 pm to 3nOut
quote:
I think y'all are asking me to argue for what I don't believe.
I wasn't trying to be purposefully obtuse. I took it that maybe you believe those studies were fake.
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:55 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Hate speech
And in those two words you just made the OP's point. Any opinion you don't agree with you try to marginalize their POV by defining it as "hate speech". Remind me where Phil claimed he hated gays or they should be imprisoned/tortured for their choices???*
Bingo part 2
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:06 pm to UMTigerRebel
Has there ever been an animal studied that was exclusively homosexual?
I obviously don't mean a species, just a single test subject.
I obviously don't mean a species, just a single test subject.
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:07 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
I wasn't trying to be purposefully obtuse. I took it that maybe you believe that those studies were fake.
ok. no i don't think they are fake or inaccurate in the least. i may be a christian but I'm not willfully ignorant.
I am just concluding that I don't believe homosexuality is a permanent position from birth from which there is no straying, like with animals*.
Conditions, genetic makeup, experiences, and host of other things lead lead to it. If one person was gay their whole life and then willfully turns straight on their own accord, then either the genetics changed or they changed their mind. one of the two.
Now that doesn't serve up nicely in a package. neither side of the "science" part of this will at the end of the day. the jury is not in whichever side you take.
*bigotproofed: i am not comparing homosexuals to animals in any way, shape, or form. simply a sharing of the fact that both willfully engage in homosexual practices.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:07 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Has there ever been an animal studied that was exclusively homosexual?
Yeah but they went extinct eons ago.
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:09 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Has there ever been an animal studied that was exclusively homosexual?
i actually researched this just now.
i couldn't find anything for monogomous homosexual behavior, but some species do have a culture of it in the absence of a member of the opposite sex.
was actually very interesting and didn't really prove either side.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:12 pm to 3nOut
I highly doubt there is one. Animals are instinctual, and there would be no biological benefit to being exclusively homosexual.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:13 pm to OBReb6
quote:
I obviously don't mean a species, just a single test subject.
I want to say there was a study in sheep/rams maybe that did? I want to say I read somewhere that a small percentage of male sheep will only mate with other males.
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News